Home » Hot off the Press » Re: NYT’s bad ethics
As I mention in my article, it’s an interesting approach to such a piece, to say the least. Using the quotes of former campaign staffers as a lens, the Times then goes on to get sexy. But it pivots at the moment it’s about to get sexy — such as the affair insinuation. It never says there was an affair, just that staffers were convinced there was one.
Obviously that doesn’t make it any better. But it shows how this piece gets precariously close to the line and trips over it.
And, Quin, can I order a nothingburger, with an order of smear fries?
Nobody, to my knowledge, has ever accused Rep. Ilhan Omar...Read More
Perhaps it's a sop to the aging liberals who still...Read More
On Monday, May 25, 2020, George Floyd, a man with...Read More
I've discussed the "hero's journey of Donald Trump” here in...Read More
The Christian story started very simply: a mother delivered her...Read More
For decades, the Democrats have depended on the overwhelming support...Read More