June 18, 2013 | 1 comment
June 16, 2013 | 0 comments
June 14, 2013 | 11 comments
June 13, 2013 | 0 comments
June 12, 2013 | 6 comments
Why didn’t Senate Republicans initiate immigration reform with visa reform for skilled, educated immigrants? They should have drafted a bill immediately after the election.
The comprehensive approach requires visas for entrepreneurs to be linked to those of low wage laborers.
Republicans have proposed increasing the number of visas for skilled immigrants by cutting the number available for unskilled immigrants—a trade-off that Democrats oppose.
The United States does not have a specific visa for young entrepreneurs, unlike Canada and Chile.
President Obama and some in Congress have proposed a “start-up visa.” Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies responded to this in the following way to the Post:
“It’s a stupid idea,” said Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports tighter immigration controls. “What is an entrepreneur? Businesses come and go.”
While the Republican Party laments the stupidity of President Obama’s policies and Sen. Rubio works to draft a probably insufficient “comprehensive” immigration bill, China, Canada, and Chile poach our foreign-born graduates:
China has given bonuses of up to $150,000 to thousands of highly skilled expatriates…Chile is luring top talent with $40,000 in capital, free office space and a quick visa through its “Start-up Chile” program…On April 1, Canada plans to launch a start-up visa program giving entrepreneurs immediate permanent residence.
Our graduating immigrants don’t want to go home. They want to invent and work in the United States. Meanwhile, we want their determination and talents for science, math, engineering and technology.
Again, why didn’t the GOP draft a bill expanding the H1-B visa for foreign workers who have started their own businesses? Currently, only employees of U.S. firms are eligible for these, but not those who’ve created their own start-ups.
Instead, we chose to pursue the “comprehensive” approach.
So goes economic innovation. So goes policy innovation.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?