The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Senate Republican leadership believes that the parliamentarian allowed Democrats to violate the rules of the Senate by allowing Sen. Bernie Sanders to cut off the reading of his single-payer proposal.

When an amendment is introduced, it has to be read on the Senate floor unless the rest of the Senate agrees to cut off the reading, and typically, the requirement is waived through "unanimous consent." Yet today, Sen. Tom Coburn insisted that Sanders' 767 page bill be read on the Senate floor, which was on pace to take more than 12 hours.

But about three hours into the reading, Sanders withdrew his amendment, and this stopped the reading of the bill -- even without unanimous consent.

"In allowing Sanders to do that, it appears the parliamentarian has broken the standing rules of the Senate," a Republican aide emails. "We're looking into the implications of this and working on where to go from here."

Here is the relevant part of Riddick's Senate Procedure, which the GOP believes Democrats have violated, emphasis was in the email:

“Reading: Under Rule XV, paragraph 1, and Senate precedents, an amendment shall be read by the Clerk before it is up for consideration or before the same shall be debated unless a request to waive the reading is granted; in practice that includes an ordinary amendment or an amendment in the nature of a substitute, the reading of which may not be dispensed with except by unanimous consent, and if the request is denied the amendment must be read and further interruptions are not in order; interruptions of the reading of an amendment that has been proposed are not in order, even for the purpose of proposing a substitute amendment to a committee amendment which is being read. When an amendment is offered the regular order is its reading, and unanimous consent is required to call off the reading.” (Riddick’s Senate Procedure, P.43-44)

"It looks like there’s nothing the Democrats aren’t prepared to do to jam this unpopular health care bill down the throats of the American public," the aide writes.

View all comments (26) | Leave a comment

WRJonas| 12.16.09 @ 5:04PM

Whats the comedy line?... Badges ? Badges ? We don't need no stinkin' badges. (I 'll bet the Presiding Officer is a Democrat .) We make the stinkin' rules !

MarkJ| 12.16.09 @ 6:33PM

Q: What's the difference between the Democrats and members of the Taliban?

A: You can actually reason with some of the Taliban.

lman| 12.16.09 @ 6:52PM

For all the real news .. in other words what the media will not report or attempts to skew otherwise: http://www.repubx.com

TG| 12.16.09 @ 6:56PM

If you're wondering why everybody's IP address keeps showing up twice in your visitor log, it's because Veronique de Rugy at NRO's Corner accidentally posted this link twice, while implying each was a different link.

And since I'm on administrative matters: Your donation popup does funky things on the Opera browser, forcing the page focus to the center of the page. Which means lots of scrolling back up when long comments threads are present. Just an FYI.

PD Quig| 12.16.09 @ 7:07PM

Either rules are rules, or might make right.

Haul out the guns and ammo,
Because there's something in the air
We've got to get it together sooner or later
Because the revolution's here

And you know it's right.

Jo8246b| 12.17.09 @ 8:15AM

Way to go Sen. Colburn of Ok.. keep it up

Ali A. Rizvi| 12.17.09 @ 12:45PM

I agree with Coburn.

The reading aloud rule helped a lot hundreds of years ago when bills were difficult to copy, print, or type, and needed to be read aloud. In the last few years, where people like GW Bush and Sarah Palin have held prominent positions in politics, having things read to the Republicans is becoming more important. Not everyone in government is an elitist who can read and comprehend complex legislation. Thank you Senator Coburn!

No One Important| 12.17.09 @ 1:51PM

Look, the democrats are desperate to get this over.

They’re going down in flames. 61% of the nation now opposes this. The democrats have stuck with the “the status quo is not an option” mantra, however, polling shows, YEA, it IS an option with the public. An OPTION the public would rather TAKE than accept what the democrats are pushing.

So now, the democrats have this horrendous bill, saddled on them from the parasitic lefties, and it’s going to kill them in 2010.

So you either RIP it off, and start over, which they won’t do because there’s not a single one among them strong enough to call a “pig” a pig, or you just let this parasite of a bill strangle you and hope someone will save you in the near future.

Meanwhile, lead parasites like Pelosi and Obama try to sooth them into thinking all will be fine, coming from those not at risk in 2010.

Their “siren’s” call, attempting to BS the other democrats into going along with them, is nothing different than what Obama did to the nation. And now, some democrats are starting to abhore having Obama treat them as stupid as he treated the American voter.

The voter is waking up, and the democrats can’t get away from a POTUS who has deluded himself into thinking this is good for the nation.

1 in 7 Americans is struggling to buy food, but this Potus gives himself a B+?

Wow, and he thinks the BANKERS are out of touch?

It’s clear now who is completely clueless. Obama, and the democrats following him. The only democrat that might survive a contested race next year is the democrat that stands up and says “I’m tired of wasting time on this, when Americans need jobs, and they need us to do OUR jobs. Drop this nonsense, and we’ll start over later, but right now, the nation needs us to focus on their top priority. It always was and always has been the economy. Not HC reform.”

But you won’t find a single democrat out there strong enough to say it.

And what does that tell you?

A Conservative Teacher| 12.17.09 @ 2:10PM

Rules, Democrats don't need no stinken rules. They're trying to put in place a dictatorship based on rule of men, not a democracy based on rule of law. The rules are probably alive anyways, able to be changed whenever you don't like them, sort of like our living Constitution. I'm joking to cover the disgust I feel.

Scared in Seattle| 12.17.09 @ 2:33PM

Bush lied...
The rule died.

Geez, how can anybody care about some li'l old Senate rule when hundreds--no, thousands--of helpless little kids are dying every day in our streets all because they don't have government managed health care plans? Such heartlessness simply astonishes.

Charles (Chuck) Schumer| 12.17.09 @ 2:37PM

Rules? Rules are for the little people, bitch!

Mike Zarowitz| 12.17.09 @ 2:41PM

Our tax dollars at work.

The way I see it, Sen Sanders did offer a substitute amendment. A null one.

Can we get back to not doing work yet?

Andrew| 12.17.09 @ 5:53PM

Rule XV, section 2, in the Standing Rules of the Senate says: "Any motion, amendment, or resolution may be withdrawn or modified by the mover at any time before a decision, amendment or ordering of the yeas and nays, except a motion to reconsider, which shall not be withdrawn without leave." Anyone know why this rule would not be applicable to the Sanders-Coburn situation?

Eddie| 12.18.09 @ 11:58PM

because you may only withdraw "before a decision" -- the reading itself counts as a decision, and had already begun which is why this rule no longer applied.

racking| 1.6.10 @ 10:14AM

http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com

as a whole contractor for cold store equipment, design, manufacturing, installation.

professional racking & shelving manufacturer, pallet racking, drive in racking,
cantilever racking, longspan shelving, dexion racking,

Vehicle tracking systems| 2.8.10 @ 4:50AM

Hey the way I see it, Sen Sanders did offer a substitute amendment. A null one.

Voip reviews| 2.8.10 @ 4:54AM

Certainly dull, he should havn't done that anway for his own sake.

Cell phone trackers| 2.8.10 @ 4:56AM

They're trying to put in place a dictatorship based on rule of men, not a democracy based on rule of law. The rules are probably alive anyways, able to be changed whenever you don't like them.

Really need them

mili8951| 5.8.10 @ 1:58AM

http://www.edhardycawholesale.com/

GPS tracking| 12.3.10 @ 10:40PM

Whats the comedy line?... Badges ? Badges ? We don't need no stinkin' badges. (I 'll bet the Presiding Officer is a Democrat .) We make the stinkin' rules ! cell phone gps tracking

wholesale beads| 4.18.11 @ 2:31AM

wholesale beads for beading

Slewing Rings| 7.5.11 @ 12:05AM

Start aboriginal annular the HSBC Adolescence Golf A few canicule ago the wind accept a actual low temperatures six to seven degrees." Caddy, a account for the chase said.

Turntable Bearings| 7.5.11 @ 12:06AM

nimate faces. The 450SS physique FW's are advised for top aisle and ambit performance. While the R9 SuperMax FW does accept FCT, it is by itself abounding for draw bias. Now, buy the TaylorMade R9 SuperMax alternation online, you should save lots of money. If you ambition to apperceive abundant added information, you may apprehend my added articles. Thank you for account my article!

Slewing Bearings| 7.5.11 @ 12:06AM

TaylorMade R9 SuperMax Band and TaylorMade R9 SuperMax Fairway Copse will be afraid allowance for Taylormade fans, so you adeptness buy them for you adulation ones. Taylormade will absolution all atramentous fairway dupe and rescues both with FCT and a new set of irons. The SuperMax FWfeatures a bigger sized arch with mid top custom 455 Stainless A

Slew Bearings| 7.5.11 @ 12:07AM

European Ladies Abecedarian Championship and the Inferior All-embracing Championship of Spain champion. Mo aswell played for the adolescence larboard the Solheim Cup and Ryder Cup and win adolescent people, in the LPGA condoning academy she accustomed the eighth and won the 2011 LPGA qualifying; the contempo Women's European Bout Condoning School, she won third, aswell won the women's European Bout qualification. Mo larboard in the bold cutting a woman's GN series, and starring the next commercial and business activities.

ysbearing| 10.19.11 @ 1:47AM

Slewing ring is also called slewing bearing, some people called: rotary support, swing support. English Name: slewing bearing or slewing ring bearing or turn table bearing, slewing ring in the real industrial applications is very wide.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/12/16/senate-gop-says-dems-violated

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT