The American Spectator

Marc Authier| 12.11.09 @ 1:46PM

She should start by helself. Diane Francis would make a great SS officer.

Derek Leaberry| 12.11.09 @ 1:47PM

Miss Francis shows the totalitarian side of the Left, even the soft Left, with her prescriptions on forced child limits. But that's not surprising. Perhaps a bargain can be made. Conservatives would have more babies and liberals would have fewer.

Grzmlyk| 12.11.09 @ 1:59PM

Forced retroactive abortions, that is the only answer. Unlike the traditional kind, the retroactive ones do not target the innocent.

We'll start with libs - they should line up to do their part for the planet. I'm sure Diane would be happy to hand over her children and then get in line herself.

You know, for the planet.

Marc Authier | 12.11.09 @ 2:00PM

For your information Dereck, Diane Francis is far right extremist. She wants firts control and exterminate the poor and the destitutes like Charles Darwin and like Adolf Hitler.

REC| 12.11.09 @ 4:04PM

And like those notorious right wingers and prominent advocates of eugenics Margaret Sanger (mother of Planned Parenthood), John Maynard Keynes (Obama's favorite economist), and Sir John Huxley (founder of the World Wildlife Fund).

Bob| 12.11.09 @ 8:22PM

You are an idiot!

Larry| 12.11.09 @ 10:12PM

Charles Darwins's theory only applies to evolution on the gentic level. He never intended and it simply does not apply on a social level. That is the biggest missconception about Darwin's idea.

jto| 12.12.09 @ 9:04AM

Leftists are incapable of rational argument. Severe beatings are the best solution to them. They have a data gene missing and never mature beyond four years old.

Marc Authier| 12.11.09 @ 2:02PM

Google malthusianism, social darwinism and nazism. Diane Francis is a nazi.

JohnD| 12.11.09 @ 2:46PM

Whether socialism or national socialism (nazi-ism) they are both the same collectivist, inti-Individual rights, anti-freedom, anti-human, anti-Christian drivel. In my opinion, both philosophies are on the left.

Derek Leaberry| 12.11.09 @ 2:57PM

Thank you for your information, Mr. Authier. I would be sorry if she was associated with conservatism. The little I've read about her in the last 24 hours reveals very little.

Grzmlyk| 12.11.09 @ 3:12PM

Yeah, she's a "far right extremist" like Obama is a traditional conservative.

Typical lib: Up is down, in is out, hot is cold, good is bad - and Nazis were right wing.

No, they weren't.

Here's a good primer for ya: Those who believe in more government control are considered "left." Those who believe in individual freedom unfettered by government control are considered "right."

No charge this time, but if I have to remind you again, the bill will be steep.

Bob| 12.11.09 @ 8:24PM

Well said.

Larry| 12.11.09 @ 10:24PM

The Nazis shouldn't even be in this discusion. They were a dictatorship. They had the term "socialist" in their name but they weren't socialist. They were an aberration. They weren't right wing either.

I admit I'm a lib; it looks like the US banking system could have benefited from some "control". The Canadian Banking system desperately wanted a piece of the pie before everything went bust world wide but were not allowed due to being regulated. They are now held up as a model of how to bank properly. IF the US banking system had more regulation it wouldn't have need the massive taxpayer bailout...

Indiana Alex| 12.11.09 @ 3:38PM

google Liberal Fascism

Margaret Mueller| 12.11.09 @ 4:13PM

And who, Ms. Francis, is going to tell dar-al-Islam that they need to cut their birthrate from average six children per family to one? You, maybe?

Preston Cole| 12.11.09 @ 9:31PM

She wants this to be a law? she has two kids... Which one is she going to kill?

Pickletoes| 12.12.09 @ 1:28PM

Tsk tsk, Preston...don't you know that the rules "they" impose on us lesser carbon units ...do not apply to THEM? We are inferior and therefore need to be controlled and supressed. THEY know what is best for us.....um.....right? I am sure her children will grow, marry and produce several grandchildren for her to dote upon. We, on the other hand, need to jump into a pit to be buried alive and then turn to compost to feed her grandkids.

Yembu71| 12.21.09 @ 7:26PM

Pickletoes....LOL!!

Wayne Harropson| 12.11.09 @ 9:38PM

The Population Paradox:
An intelligent, educated individual explains to his tribe that there are far too many human beings on the planet and that, by increasing our numbers, we risk our own safety and that of our children.
On hearing this information, the more intelligent, sensitive, caring listeners resolve to have fewer children.
On hearing the same information, the less intelligent, sensitive, caring listeners don’t change their behavior.
The result is fewer intelligent, sensitive, caring people in the next generation.

Yes, the Population Paradox really is as simple as that — to put it bluntly, people who care about the state of the planet are outcompeted by those who don’t.

Source: http://www.arachnoid.com/evolution/index.html

Answer: Let Liberals think that they are the “intelligent, sensitive, caring people” and just wait it out. WH

Don Kemp| 12.11.09 @ 11:10PM

Diane Francis's one-child policy is like something out of bad science fiction. She obviously doesn't understand the concepts of free will and self determination

Tman| 12.12.09 @ 2:01AM

Francis is a conservative....one of your ilk....so much for trashing the left for this.

Ryan| 12.12.09 @ 3:13AM

Diane Francis is one of the most respected writers in Canada and in North America. I think she was making a slightly ironic argument...not necessarily "let's go out and do this now." She has a point -- really. While Americans are blatantly promoting 8 kids -- or better yet 12 -- I find this has nothing to do with Liberal or Conservative ideology. More like Smart VS Stupid, since most of these morons having all these kids need government support to pay for them. And as someone who hates too much government in my life...I would rather see the latter. Better yet, give these parents a test to see if they qualify to have kids.

Is that what Conservatives in the States would like, David, to pay for 12 kids out of your own pocket??

Ryan| 12.12.09 @ 3:16AM

Oh, and if you read her business colums and books, I think she if far more a Conservative "thinker" than a "Liberal" one.

Marc Authier| 12.12.09 @ 6:03AM

Conservative like Adolf Hitler and Charle Darwin. She is an anglo-saxon social darwinist. In the 1920 the USA sterilized the poor and the Indians living on reserves. Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the eugenics policies of sterilizing the Indians, the poor and the mentally handicapped in the 20's was a real source of inspiration for him. Diane Francis is a good old nazi.

Jim Hlavac| 12.12.09 @ 12:34PM

Um, it is Communist China which has the one child policy the lady does like and proposes. It is a point about which many commentators here are somewhat confused. Perhaps Chinese Communists are not really communists much as it is said that National Socialists are not really socialists.
I suppose if only the bad "right wing" people who use the good words of communism and socialism would stop attaching it to the evil "right wing" the world would be able to get to "true" communism and socialism. Yah. Right.
Still, Adolf Hitler in fact wanted many more children. Oodles of them! He just wanted perfect aryan german children. The other children were, of course, expendable, so that there might be Lebensraum (living room) for the good Deutsche Brood to fill.
Darwin merely pointed out that children (of any species) will have mutations that are passed on to their children, and that children with no children of their own will not pass on their genes. And also that less and less children, below the replacement rate, is called "extinction of the species." He did not say if extinction is a left or right wing issue.
The Dinosaurs, though, did try the one child rule, and look at what they got: a bunch of bird brains.
Which I suppose is the ultimate goal of the Diane Francis types who think We the People are screwing up our planet -- wherever anyone thinks she lies on the political spectrum based on the protagonists in Revolutionary France of 1789. Nothing like "modern" concepts to fill the voids of thought in our modern world, eh?

Keith| 12.12.09 @ 5:10PM

We could have a Cap and Trade for humans.
I will sell you my one, so you can have two.

Rod| 12.16.09 @ 3:58AM

I agree. I believe the world has gone insane.

Dave Nash| 12.12.09 @ 6:46PM

The real threat to humanity is not the Global Warming Lie, it is people like Diane Francis. As stated above, Diane Francis ironically has 2 Children of her own. I wonder which one she would sacrifice in order to "save the planet"? Maybe Communist China's Birth Control Office would be willing to snatch one of Diane Francis' children up and do away with them for the "good" of the planet?

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n.....iew/18338/

Maybe they could come along and kidnap Mrs. Francis herself and force sterilize her?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....733835.ece

I wonder if Mrs. Francis truly believes in what she is campaigning for? Is she willing to put her money, or should I say her Children, or Herself, where her mouth is?

Dave Nash
Cross Canada Run For The Children

Martin| 12.12.09 @ 7:09PM

Diane Francis proves that it is quite possible to be intelligent and well-educated, and at the same time be a complete and total jerk. In fact, some of the stupidest ideas imaginable often come from academia and Ms Francis is a perfect example.
A totally uneducated simple labourer exhibits more common sense than Francis.
How can this be?
Well, I maintain that obtaining a "higher" education in today's colleges is synonymous with surrendering your native common sense in exchange for a brain-washing by radical leftist tenured "professors" who received THEIR education during the radical sixties and who now have taken over the higher educational systems of the Western World.
The same goes for today's mass media of newspapers and television news by and large.
When parents spend their hard-earned money sending their kids to college today they sure get an education: Besides leftist ideology, they are educated in sexual experimentation, immorality, elitism, and disrespect for tradition, religion, ethics, honesty, etc.
It takes a good two to three decades of real life and maturity to nullify the negative effects of a modern college education. In this respect, Diane Francis strikes me as being particularly retarded.
Hopefully, Ms. Francis will eventually grow up, mature and finally give up her elitist, pseudointellectual drivel.

Rod| 12.15.09 @ 12:38PM

A totally uneducated common labourer contributes more to society than than some white collar thief bankers and brainless over paid MPs MLAs and idiot global warming Nazis. So watch who you disrect

Ryan| 12.13.09 @ 1:10AM

China is successful because they still have something called respect passed on to their kids, unlike the current hoodlums coming out of universities and colleges in North America. I am tired of people thinking that controlling 1.3 billion people and their populations is only because they want to "control" their people like Hitler.

There is major science to back up the claim that the world is overpopulated -- this is not made-up drivel Martin.

And, boy oh boy do people overreact to one little article in a newspaper opinion piece. Do you honestly think they could ever control populations like that here? Impossible. What the government could do though is say fine, we will help out with one child -- you are on YOUR OWN for the other! If you all agree to that, then so be it.

Rod| 12.15.09 @ 2:58PM

The Chinese are successful because they are tolatarian regime that rules by fear and retribution against family members if anyone speaks out against the governing elite. Also with one point three billion citizens or about one fifth of the world population they are the biggest threat to mankind. Them and countries like India where government takes no responsibility for nine tenths of it's citizens. So stop blaming the developed countries for all the evils in the world the rest just want what we have and they are destroying everything in their greed take it. The only reason the developing nations want a climate change agreement is so their dictators can continue to sit on their lazy butts and collect handouts from the western civilized countries. As for Ms Francis she is just another load mouth Sarah Palin jumping on any band wagon that gets them public exposure.

Boston| 12.13.09 @ 11:21AM

None of you understand...Rules wouldn't apply to Elitists like her or her sister. Just another example of liberal hypocrisy.

Marc Authier| 12.15.09 @ 12:15PM

Boston. You don't get it. She is not a liberal. Diane Francis is nazi. She is a fascist. An anglo-saxon fascist inspired by her fan Adolf Hitler, Darwin and Galton. As for China, the country has never been communist. It is in reality a neo-nazi slave state. Brown or red nazi. It's the same type of tyranny.

deqlane s blaque| 1.1.10 @ 4:50PM

first of all china is a peaceful mono cultural nation without the nonsense of people such as marc authier. secondly it is the only country 'attempting' internally to stop population breakout. to apologise to muslim's and use phrases like body bags is to succumb to bullying threats. francis is right with capital 'r's'. australia is being 'destroyed before our eyes, like pacific island nations because of uncontrolled ethnic breeding and of course government handouts. people's need to wake up now

Eric Cox| 1.2.10 @ 7:04AM

@Marc Authier, who asserted that Diane Francis was a right-winger, from Ms. Francis' own site, which was linked in the story itself:

'Politically, I'm a small "c" conservative in Canada which, surprisingly, makes me slightly left of the Democrats here.'

racking| 1.7.10 @ 12:18AM

http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com