Chris Cillizza has an interesting
item about how Evan Bayh's vote for the Nelson-Hatch
amendment -- which would have imposed serious restrictions on
taxpayer funding of abortion in the health care bill -- signals
the end of his national aspirations. Bayh, who'd previously voted
to ban partial-birth abortions, would now have a really tough
time overcoming the objections of pro-choice activists. And he's
moved right on just enough issues to give him trouble in other
policy areas too.
Cillizza's right that we probably won't see a President Bayh, but
I think the rollcall on Nelson-Hatch signals something more
basic: the political difficulty of representing a red state and
voting for taxpayer funding of abortion. Bayh is up for
reelection in 2010 and is trying to avoid handing a possible
Republican challenger easy ammunition. It was the strategy
employed by the last Democrat who ran against
John Hostettler, current Congressman Brad Ellsworth.
Senator Bahy,should work for the Lilly company he represents them
not the people of Indiana,Luger isnt any more responsive,I wont
vote fur either in next election. John Heslin Chesterton
In.46304.
John Heslin| 12.13.09 @ 5:18PM
Senator Bahy,should work for the Lilly company he represents them not the people of Indiana,Luger isnt any more responsive,I wont vote fur either in next election. John Heslin Chesterton In.46304.
china racking| 1.7.10 @ 1:00AM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com