The Associated Press is
reporting that Senate Democrats have reached a tentative deal
that would drop the so-called public option.
Although they have not yet announced details, reports in recent
days have centered on a pact that would have the entity that runs
the federal employee health care system oversee the creation of
privately administered non-profit plans that would be offered on
the new government exchanges. In return for giving up the
public option, liberals would be rewarded with a plan to expand
Medicare to those age 55 and over, and to expand Medicaid
eligibility to 150 percent of the federal poverty level.
The new proposal would have to be evaluated by the Congressional
Budget Office.
UPDATE: Brian Beutler
reports that the deal still leaves open the possibility of a
"triggered" public option, and that the Medicare expansion would
be begin in 2011. While there would be no subsidies for the first
three years, after 2014, Medicare would be offered on the
exchanges to those over 55, who would be able to use the
subsidies already created by the bill to pay for it. And,
according to Beutler, Medicaid would not be expanded to 150
percent of the federal poverty level.
…large government health care program that currently serves the over-65 population. read more… Further details on this proposed measure will be released after CBO scoring is complete. Commentary AmSpecBlog Red State The Agonist Riehl World View Hot Air Categories: American Politics · Current Events Tagged: Democrats, health care, Health Care Reform, Public Option, Senate 0 responses so far ↓…
Yosemeti Sam| 12.8.09 @ 11:45PM
Hocus-Pocus!
" ... In return for giving up the public option, liberals would
be rewarded with a plan to expand Medicare to those age 55 and
over, and to expand Medicaid eligibility to 150 percent of the
federal poverty level...."
LOL.
Cut 500 billion from Medicare - and more are
welcome to the residue of coverage.
LOL.
Liberal Reader| 12.9.09 @ 12:00AM
Yosemite
Don't write "LOL." It makes you sound like a jackass.
Yosemeti Sam| 12.9.09 @ 12:08AM
I will deign to respond to a humorless individual -
Liberal Reader.
The Archie Bunker Bronx cheer - aka He Haw !
martin j smith| 12.9.09 @ 7:58AM
YS: Don't expend too much on LR --LR is more predictable that the
weather.
…He’s a yellow cur. [HT Hot Air ] UPDATE: While Blue Dogs like Nelson slide back under the porch, no one can figure out which way the cat jumped on the Public Option. Earlier this evening it was reported that the beast had been offered to the vivisectionist in order to seal the deal. Now, we’re hearing that it’s still clinging to its ninth life . Post a Comment Your email is never published…
Dave B| 12.9.09 @ 1:17AM
This is a set-up. Don't be fooled. All the Democrats that are on
record for voting against public options, abortion, and so on is
cover only. It will be passed with the amendments, then sent to
committee and re-done. They don't have to vote for it then
because all that is needed is 51 votes. We're screwed.
Yosemeti Sam| 12.9.09 @ 1:27AM
Footnote:
Consider the magnitude of the Democrat Party
undertaking - über alles! Translation - over the
American citizenry.
Taken in polemical context, the Democrat party - led by a
half-black Tarzan swinging in the leftist
jungle of ideology beating his chest -is led by the nose of
special tribal interests; thus exhibiting his transfigured
Medusan mediocrity sense of governance. Gross!
LOL!
i.e. Derisive LOL!
Sam| 12.9.09 @ 2:00AM
It's about time the Democrats came around to understand how the
public option will be the end of their political careers, never
mind a terrible step for this country.
They know that they cannot ram their health care down our throats
and perhaps they might (with a strong emphasis on might) start
looking at real solutions.
And seriously everyone, stop whining about the Medicare
expansion. The major threat is the existence of this new public
option they originally proposed. We should be grateful that it
has been averted- that is the most important thing.
Roy| 12.9.09 @ 8:41AM
This IS a huge welfare option in itself - lower the age to 55 and
you're covering(more or less) another 6th of the population right
there, huge numbers of which were previously paying for their own
coverage.
martin j smith| 12.9.09 @ 7:55AM
There are too many holes in this swiss cheese.
JP| 12.9.09 @ 8:01AM
Regardless of Reid's smoke and mirrors, tthe question remains:
Who is going to pay for all of this? Medicare as it is currently
configured will go into the red in 7 years. By lowering the age
to 55, the Senate is forcing the issue. It will go broke in under
3 years. The Senate's answer is quite simple: it will force both
individuals and businesses to pick up the tab. And since the
Senate is lowering the Medicare age requirements it cannot raid
the $500 billion in Medicare funds.
In a recession, this is quite absurd. If the Senate is determined
to put the US into a very deep recession, this is a good way to
start.
Pingback| 12.8.09 @ 8:50PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : AP: Dems Drop "Public O links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Liberal Reader| 12.8.09 @ 10:00PM
Washington Post is reporting differently on this.
Hey, wait a minute. I thought they were both a part of the same liberal conspiracy ....
Pingback| 12.8.09 @ 10:53PM
Public Option “tentatively” dropped by Senate Democrats. « The Western Experience links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Yosemeti Sam| 12.8.09 @ 11:45PM
Hocus-Pocus!
" ... In return for giving up the public option, liberals would be rewarded with a plan to expand Medicare to those age 55 and over, and to expand Medicaid eligibility to 150 percent of the federal poverty level...."
LOL.
Cut 500 billion from Medicare - and more are
welcome to the residue of coverage.
LOL.
Liberal Reader| 12.9.09 @ 12:00AM
Yosemite
Don't write "LOL." It makes you sound like a jackass.
Yosemeti Sam| 12.9.09 @ 12:08AM
I will deign to respond to a humorless individual -
Liberal Reader.
The Archie Bunker Bronx cheer - aka He Haw !
martin j smith| 12.9.09 @ 7:58AM
YS: Don't expend too much on LR --LR is more predictable that the weather.
Pingback| 12.9.09 @ 12:40AM
Health Care BS - BEN NELSON: ALL BARK, NO BITE ON ABORTION links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Dave B| 12.9.09 @ 1:17AM
This is a set-up. Don't be fooled. All the Democrats that are on record for voting against public options, abortion, and so on is cover only. It will be passed with the amendments, then sent to committee and re-done. They don't have to vote for it then because all that is needed is 51 votes. We're screwed.
Yosemeti Sam| 12.9.09 @ 1:27AM
Footnote:
Consider the magnitude of the Democrat Party
undertaking - über alles! Translation - over the
American citizenry.
Taken in polemical context, the Democrat party - led by a half-black Tarzan swinging in the leftist
jungle of ideology beating his chest -is led by the nose of special tribal interests; thus exhibiting his transfigured Medusan mediocrity sense of governance. Gross!
LOL!
i.e. Derisive LOL!
Sam| 12.9.09 @ 2:00AM
It's about time the Democrats came around to understand how the public option will be the end of their political careers, never mind a terrible step for this country.
They know that they cannot ram their health care down our throats and perhaps they might (with a strong emphasis on might) start looking at real solutions.
And seriously everyone, stop whining about the Medicare expansion. The major threat is the existence of this new public option they originally proposed. We should be grateful that it has been averted- that is the most important thing.
Roy| 12.9.09 @ 8:41AM
This IS a huge welfare option in itself - lower the age to 55 and you're covering(more or less) another 6th of the population right there, huge numbers of which were previously paying for their own coverage.
martin j smith| 12.9.09 @ 7:55AM
There are too many holes in this swiss cheese.
JP| 12.9.09 @ 8:01AM
Regardless of Reid's smoke and mirrors, tthe question remains: Who is going to pay for all of this? Medicare as it is currently configured will go into the red in 7 years. By lowering the age to 55, the Senate is forcing the issue. It will go broke in under 3 years. The Senate's answer is quite simple: it will force both individuals and businesses to pick up the tab. And since the Senate is lowering the Medicare age requirements it cannot raid the $500 billion in Medicare funds.
In a recession, this is quite absurd. If the Senate is determined to put the US into a very deep recession, this is a good way to start.
china racking| 1.7.10 @ 12:57AM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com
Portable eye wash| 4.12.11 @ 6:08AM
I am really very glad after read here and I appreciate for the information that you presented here.