Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska said in a Thursday conference call
that Harry Reid’s abortion language in the Senate health care
bill was merely a “bookkeeping gimmick” that would not prevent
federal funding for abortion.
Under the language approved by the House of Representatives,
nobody could use federal subsidies toward the purchase of a
policy that covered abortion. But under pressure from pro-choice
groups, Reid placed language in the Senate bill that would work
out a complicated formula aimed at segregating funds so that
women who received federal subsidies could still purchase
policies with abortion services as long as the subsidies didn’t
support the cost of the abortion coverage.
“It’s a bookkeeping gimmick,” Johanns said. “The same argument
was made on the House side and it was just aggressively rejected
by the pro-life community and by those House members who stood
up.
He explained, “A premium is a premium. The government is going to
have its dollars in that and this idea that somehow you’re
segregating that just isn’t going to past muster. You just can’t
draw that line in a bookkeeping entry, and they know it. What
they’re trying to do is to provide some cover to pro-life
members, but the pro-life community has aggressively rejected
that.”
Johanns also warned that if Reid gets the necessary 60 votes on
Saturday’s motion to bring the bill to the Senate floor in its
current form, that the abortion language will not get changed.
Once the bill is on the floor, it would take 60 votes to amend
it, and there aren’t that many pro-life votes in the Senate.
That’s why he said it was crucial to stop the bill from moving to
the floor in the first place.
“The real key vote here is on the motion to proceed if you’re
pro-life,” he said.
We'll now see that Sen. Casey (D-PA) doesn't have the backbone
his father had. I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that he votes
with the majority on sending the bill to the floor. Later, when
only 50 votes are needed, Reid will let him vote against the
language. Then he'll come home and pretend he's pro-life. We have
to hold his feet, as well as Sen. Nelsons, to the fire on this.
Call them now!
…abortion language in the Senate health care bill was merely a “ bookkeeping gimmick” that would not prevent federal funding for abortion. Originally posted here: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Sen. Johanns Calls Reid's … Bookkeeping, Health, Health Care, Language abortion-language, Bookkeeping, harry, harry-reid, Health, johanns, language, senate, thursday Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)…
…to Vote to Advance Senate Health Bill At the American Spectator Blog, Philip Klein comments on Sen. Nelson’s rationale: “The problem, as [Nelson's] co-Senator from Nebraska Mike Johanns noted yesterday, is that once the bill gets to the floor, there will need to be 60 votes to change the abortion language. And there simply aren’t that many pro-life votes in the Senate. So this really was a…
Pingback| 11.19.09 @ 4:35PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Sen. Johanns Calls Reid links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Big Jim| 11.19.09 @ 4:42PM
We'll now see that Sen. Casey (D-PA) doesn't have the backbone his father had. I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut that he votes with the majority on sending the bill to the floor. Later, when only 50 votes are needed, Reid will let him vote against the language. Then he'll come home and pretend he's pro-life. We have to hold his feet, as well as Sen. Nelsons, to the fire on this. Call them now!
Pingback| 11.19.09 @ 7:03PM
Valuable Internet Information » The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Sen. Johanns Ca links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 11.20.09 @ 4:35PM
ADF Alliance Alert » Nelson to support motion to proceed on Senate health care reform links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: