The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

While Britain will be a huge beneficiary if Czech President Vaclav Klaus delays ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and allows for a UK referendum, Klaus's defiant stance is one driven by care for the Czech Republic whose best interests he does and should have at heart.

David Cameron, leader of the British Conservative Party -- tipped by the polls to become Britain's next Prime Minister by next June at the latest -- has pledged to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty if it is not ratified before the next UK general election. President Klaus has practically taken on mythical status among British EU-skeptics since a referendum on Lisbon is a sure-fire way to kick-start the renegotiation of Britain's unsatisfactory relationship with the European Union.

However, the threats and pressure being leveled against President Klaus by Brussels' elites serve to remind him exactly why he is holding out for firm guarantees on Czech interests before ratifying. First of all French President Nicolas Sarkozy threatened Prague with unidentified but serious consequences of delaying ratification. Now, newly-reelected Commission President, Jose Manuel Barroso has threatened to cull the Czech's Commissioner (note that Barroso waited until after he secured Czech support for his reelection). In the absence of legally binding written guarantees, President Klaus should not trust vague assurances from people who clearly care nothing for the national interest of the Czech Republic.

As a matter of principle, safeguarding his nation's interests is nothing less than President Klaus's constitutional duty. And his concerns over the radical Charter of Fundamental Rights is valid. More a charter for fundamental socialism, it legalizes the right of collective bargaining and action among other questionable 'rights.' Klaus's concerns over the impact of property claims by ethnic Germans forced out of the Czech Sudeten region after World War II are equally valid. Until he can be confident that the Lisbon Treaty serves Prague's interest, there is no reason to rush ratification.

The EU started negotiating the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty in 2001 following the Laeken summit. Without a constitution, the EU has managed two rounds of expansion, two Euro-wide parliamentary elections and nearly two dozen EU security and defense missions (not to mention three resounding rejections of further European integration in referenda). There is absolutely no legitimate reason that President Klaus cannot wait a few more months to satisfy Czech interests. And with the highest approval ratings of all Czech politicians, he has the added bonus of popularity as well as principle on his side.

topics:
European Union, Lisbon Treaty, France, Czech Republic

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

frank| 10.16.09 @ 7:44AM

This article has so many non-sequitur, fallacies and inaccurate statements that one would not know where to start if it deserved a rebuttal...

Paul| 10.17.09 @ 6:24AM

Frank:

So you are too bone idle to explain what you mean, or you can't. Which is it?

The EU is now on the cusp of turning into the EUSSR. There's only one thing that you need to know about this 'treaty' (constitution) that has been enacted without a Europe wide referendum and that is that it's self amending. Do you know what that means? It means that there never needs to be another referendum on anything that the EU wants to do. This anti-democratic monster will be able to do as it pleases without the tiresome bother of having to consult 'we the people'.

Europe is not a country. Never will be. Never can be. We in Britain signed up for an economic club (we like clubs), we didn't sign up for a fanatical super-state with some pretty odd ideas about freedom and democracy. We want our vote NOW!

Three cheers for Vaclav Klaus! Hip hip . . .

William Humbold| 10.17.09 @ 10:00AM

See Vaclav Klaus' views on Free Europe Constitution at www.FreeEurope.info

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Sally McNamara

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/16/klaus-and-the-lisbon-treaty-no

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT