The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Despite the sweet deal arranged between the pharmaceutical industry and Obama administration (cut reimbursements by $80 billion in return for making everyone buy insurance, inflating the overall demand for pills), many congressional Democrats are not prepared to go along.  Only Republican votes on the Senate Finance Committee prevented approval of an amendment imposing much larger price cuts.

Reports the New York Times:

President Obama scored a big victory on Thursday as the Senate Finance Committee rejected a proposal to require pharmaceutical companies to give bigger discounts to Medicare on drugs dispensed to older Americans with low incomes.

The victory came at the expense of senators in Mr. Obama's own party who had championed the proposal. The vote, in effect, upheld a deal reached in June by the White House and the drug industry, which saw the agreement as a possible way to avoid more onerous requirements that might be imposed by Congress.

The proposal, an amendment by Senator Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida, would have required drug makers to provide Medicare with discounts in the form of rebates totaling more than $100 billion over 10 years.

Some of the money would have been used to close a gap in Medicare coverage of prescription drugs. In 2007, more than eight million Medicare beneficiaries fell into the gap, known as the doughnut hole.

Three Democratic senators - Max Baucus of Montana, Thomas R. Carper of Delaware and Robert Menendez of New Jersey - joined all the Republicans on the panel in defeating the amendment by a vote of 13 to 10.

Pharmaceutical price controls are a bad thing.  But the drugmakers are supporting legislation to politicize the health care received by all Americans in order to make a few extra bucks.  So if they are willing to have government run more of our lives, why shouldn't government run more of their operations too?  If they can work to wreck the U.S. health care system for profit, why shouldn't they suffer from the crash impact as well?

Next time when the pharmaceutical industry comes calling, Republican lawmakers should close their doors to the pill manufacturers and abstain from the fight.  Let the industry go back to its newfound pro-regulation buddies for relief.  If the result is price controls, so be it.  Maybe the industry will learn a valuable lesson for the next political battle.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

S.L. Toddard| 9.25.09 @ 11:32AM

"Why Is the GOP Still Protecting the Drugmakers?"

Because they serve their corporate masters and not their constituents. That is why conservatives oppose the GOP.

COnservative Bob| 9.25.09 @ 12:13PM

Still looking in ALL of the conservative writing I can find as well as the Constitution and founding documents. I can't seem to find anything in support of CENTRALIZED FEDERAL GOVERNEMNT PRICE CONTROLS ever for any reason whether the intended target is in or out of favor has made deals with the devil or not. Even evil drug companies.

Could be that they were acting on principle that happened to benefit the drug companies. Could be they were serving their corporate masters.

I am not sure what motivated them, but in a choice between legislators who act within the confines of the constitution and those that act out side of the limits set therein I would side with and support those that adhere to the limits of the constitution.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/25/why-is-the-gop-still-protectin

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT