The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Keene Analysis

For those who have missed it, there has been quite a brouhaha in conservative circles over an alleged pay-for-play arrangement involving American Conservative Union Chairman David Keene. I won't get into all the details; see here for a recap. I will thank John Hawkins for the nice words in his recap; indeed, I did ask a question designed to elicit real information from Keene. And here's the thing: He answered it. And he answered it well. Keene reiterated that he has not changed his position that FedEx Express deserves support against a bad provision designed by rival UPS and its Teamsters overlords. And he explained why he signed a letter that could be read to suggest the opposite.

I myself think that either Keene and/or the ACU come away from this looking careless. But to listen to his conference call with conservative bloggers was to listen to somebody who sounded like he was being very open, very straightforward, and very honest. Not only that, but this is a man with more than three decades of fighting the good conservative fight. This is somebody who has earned the benefit of the doubt. This is one of the people without whom today's younger conservatives would not have a "conservative movement" on which to build in the first place. Methinks this is an occasion to mark up as a lesson in managing public perception and appearances, not as an example of perfidy. David Keene still merits conservative support.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Red Phillips| 7.22.09 @ 1:19PM

"This is somebody who has earned the benefit of the doubt."

But Quin, he has not earned the benefit of the doubt. In '96 Keene endorsed Bob Dole in the primary. How is that "fighting the good conservative fight?" That is shilling for the Establishment. In 2008 he endorsed Romney, a Massachusetts RINO who only saw the conservative light when he decided to run for Pres. How is that “fighting the good conservative fight?” Donald Devine deserves deference. Keene does not.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/07/22/keene-analysis

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT