The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Bloomberg News reports that:

House Democrats are weighing a new proposal in response to Obama’s request for legislation. An outline of the plan obtained by Bloomberg News would require Americans to have insurance with some exceptions.

It would probably exempt those who can prove they can’t find an affordable policy. There could be a tax penalty for those with adequate financial resources who don’t elect to get insurance, according to the outline.

The outline suggests consumers could elect to keep their individual health insurance policies. Still, it says that “by and large” the nation’s market for individually purchased health insurance policies would move to a new federally operated exchange. It would permit both individuals and employees of small firms to buy policies at less expensive group rates.

Let's set aside for a now the fact that such a proposal would require Obama to reverse his position on an individual mandate from the campaign, and just focus on the matter of choice. Under the current system, according to Kaiser Family Foundation data, only about 6 percent of the covered population obtains their insurance on their own. About 31 percent already have government health care of some sort, while 63 percent obtain it through their employers. While Democrats talk of people being able to keep the insurance they want, it won't really be feasible under the system they're proposing. Anybody who receives health care through their employer is limited to whatever health plans their employer chooses under the current flawed system, and if employers decide to start dumping their employees on to the national insurance exchange, then suddenly they'd be losing their plans and forced to pick new ones from the national exchange. And as the article states, at least under this one proposal, the remaining individual market would "by and large" move to the national exchange.

While the promise of the national exchange is that it will be a giant buffet with lots of plans to choose from offering comprehensive coverage at lower rates, without discriminating against those with preexisting conditions, the reality will be a lot different. Government will be running the exchange, offering a government-run plan under Obama's vision, and regulating what participating insurers can or can't cover. To borrow and expand on an analogy once used by Regina Herzlinger, this would be the equivalent of a having everybody purchase their cars at a government auto dealer in which the government dictates what colors cars can be, whether or not they have a leather interior, or heated seats, or satellite radio, or any other features. This isn't reform, it is merely doubling down on the failed system that we already have in place, in which states mandate the type of benefits insurance policies have to cover, driving up the cost of insurance and restricting choice.

View all comments (10) | Leave a comment

ncatty| 6.8.09 @ 11:48AM

I am one of the 5% who obtain insurance on our won. This is what I feared. Under the Obama plan I get to keep buying my own insurance and pay for yours too.

Stan Redmond| 6.8.09 @ 2:45PM

While it is a wonderful plan on paper to have universal health insurance it frightens me. With the politicians making decisions on what to fund and how much each victimhood group and lobby group will be controlling our healthcare. White Christian men will be the continued punching bag. the gay AIDS lobby will get their boost. The minority victimhood groups will get their preference. Women? Look at the NHS in Brittain, there is 8 times more money spent on women's care then on men's health. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/911198.stm)
Your care will be directly reflected by your victimhood status as defined by politicians. If you're not a victim, you're screwed.

AND THINK OF THE CHILDREN of course.

Oldefarte| 6.8.09 @ 3:46PM

My insurance, as a 63 year old retiree and through my former employer, is $600/month and has a $2100 annual deductible [basically, except for a major medical emergency, I'm paying my own medical bills]. I am at present waiting to reach 65 and Medicare. Who knows if this universal healthcare will be beneficial to me, but I'm sure that its requirement of covering everyone cannot be a good thing. It's got to be another form of welfare, where I'll be paying my own insurance and also that of the indigent/poverty population as well. What gripes me is that there are some people out there who have/had overly expensive houses, cars, vacations, lifestyles,etc; and still claim they don't have [and can't afford insurance]. Instead of buying insurance, they're blowing their discretionary funds on garbage/wasteful things.

Maria| 6.9.09 @ 10:32AM

And how to pay for all this reform?? As economist Marty Sullivan noted this morning at Tax.com, health care reform legislation = major tax legislation.

rentacar| 10.28.09 @ 5:33PM

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing .

tag hauer watches| 12.9.09 @ 10:56PM

tag hauer watches

affiliate| 1.26.10 @ 1:35AM

beijing shenzhen
affiliate

Sanchez| 2.18.10 @ 5:34PM

Health reform has got into a major deadlock after the Mass senate election.

- health awareness digital movies

Janet| 2.18.10 @ 5:39PM

We don't need health reform.

Beyond wireless technology

ghdshop| 3.28.10 @ 11:41PM

The ghd hair straighteners have become extremely popular over recent years.GHD hair straightener is the most popular irons for curling or straightening hair.Sepecially, GHD IV Styler.What is more,GHD hair straighteners are able to provide the perfect solution to their needs. Every girls and women know that ghd hair straighteners could be make them more beautiful.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/06/08/buying-health-care-at-a-govern

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT