The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Another Take on Card Check "Compromise"

Earlier I took several companies to task for their apparent willingness to compromise on the election-ending "Card Check" bill.  Ed Morrissey argues that the apparent compromise gives organized labor little that it doesn't already have.  Writes Morrissey:

The compromise thus restores the secret ballot requirement for union organizing, and it eliminates the equally offensive arbitration provisions that would allow government to impose its own idea of the management-labor relationship.  What's left?  It forces businesses to allow union-organizing elections in a shorter period of time, and to give unions access to the workplace to organize, two provisions that would easily pass on their own in this session of Congress, and probably would get several Republican votes in both chambers.

It's not great, but it's not horrid, either.  In truth, it gives the unions little that they don't already have, and it strips them of two of their cherished prizes.  It also gives politicians on Capitol Hill a way to throw a bone to union rank and file without offering a complete game-changer.  If it's incrementalism, it's an increment of the smallest variety possible.

A few weeks ago, I predicted that Congress would reach a compromise precisely along these lines.  With this proposal floating now, it will either force the Senate (where the real battle will be fought) to accept this compromise, or it will split the pro-Card Check forces enough to stall any movement on the legislation, as the moderates now have a reason to withhold support for the much more radical version.  Businesses could live with this result, and hope that any abuses can be corrected by a more business-friendly Congress down the road.  It's still a bad bill, but the alternative is much worse.

Since there's a good chance of defeating the Card Check bill, this sort of measure seems unnecessary.  But perhaps the companies aren't as ready to feed the crocodile as I had thought.

Comments

Pingback| 3.22.09 @ 2:00PM

Another Take on Card Check "Compromise" — But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Another Take on Card Check "Compromise" — But As For Me .addtoany_share_save img{border:0;} _qoptions={ qacct:"p-d8ipuL9esDVMw" }; var sc_project=4273169; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_partition=48; var sc_click_stat=1; var sc_security="7dc50185";…

mjB| 3.22.09 @ 5:29PM

The Employee Free Choice Act should be called "The Employee Right For Intimidation" act!

http://tinyurl.com/ddjzcr

mB

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Obama's Miranda Madness

Less than an hour into the interrogation of the Christmas Day "underwear bomber," the U.S. Justice Department instructed FBI agents to advise Abdulmutallab — an al Qaeda operative from Nigeria — of his Miranda rights. Shockingly, interviews since have yielded "no actionable intelligence."

Stop plea bargaining with terrorists!

Daily Must-Reads

Brian O'Connell

* * * *

New Hampshire Not So Blue

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

Wieseltier Takedown of Sullivan

Joseph Lawler

* * * *

Islamic Censorship in Europe

Doug Bandow

* * * *

Sweet Tea for GOP in Alabama

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

While America Slept

Andrew Roberts

* * * *

Avalanche Country

Bill Croke

* * * *

A Thousand Points of Lightness

Jay D. Homnick

* * * *

Yes to the Party of No

Ross Kaminsky

* * * *

We've Got Mail

Katherine Eastland

* * * *

Obama's Miranda Madness

The Prowler

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT