June 6, 2013 | 1 comment
April 11, 2013 | 0 comments
March 28, 2013 | 1 comment
September 9, 2011 | 5 comments
September 8, 2011 | 3 comments
President Obama is quite touchy about being referred to as a “socialist.”
After appearing dismissive of a New York Times reporter’s question about whether he was a socialist, he took the unusual step of placing a post-interview call to the Old Gray Lady to clarify his remarks, the Washington Times reports.
“It was hard for me to believe that you were entirely serious about that socialist question,” said the new Oval Office inhabitant who remarked during the campaign that “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
Explaining the various government spending sprees and bailout packages that dwarf anything that President George W. Bush may have even fantasized about, Obama blamed the ancien regime and “lax regulation,” a favorite whipping boy for those who don’t understand how markets work.
“The fact that we’ve had to take these extraordinary measures and intervene is not an indication of my ideological preference, but an indication of the degree to which lax regulation and extravagant risk taking has precipitated a crisis,” Obama said.
You may recall that Vice President Joe Biden got similarly defensive during the campaign when TV reporter Barbara West asked Biden if Obama-Biden policies were “Marxist.”
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?