Today's Washington Post played as a major story an entirely unremarkable set of circumstances regarding the replacement of Arkansas US Attorney Bud Cummins with former Karl Rove aide Tim Griffin. It is therefore worth repeating that Cummins already had expressed an intention to move on, anyway, and that Griffin is eminently qualified. DoJ handled all of these replacements in a bumbling and classless manner, but Griffin and Rove both deserve strong defense in this case. The full report was in my column here at the Spectator last week. Excuse the length, but these are the relevant excerpts:
ALL OF THAT SAID, none of this bumbling and none of DoJ's ill treatment of the fired USAs would have lent itself to quite such a level of bloodlust from the left if the firings couldn't be somehow laid at the feet of the left's favorite uber-villain, Karl Rove. In reality, though, Rove's fingerprints are on only one of the replacements, that of his onetime deputy Tim Griffin. And there was no good reason for Rove to stay out of that appointment. Here was a loyal, qualified, and extremely talented underling whose job at the White House was filled because
went off to serve his country in the military. And word was that the Griffin USAin Griffin's home state of , Bud Cummins, was already open to leaving his post for more lucrative private employment after a grinding four-year term. Arkansas
Even here, though, DoJ couldn't handle the replacement with grace.
On Wednesday night, Cummins told me how he experienced the developments. First, though, understand that Cummins is a consummate gentleman and a Bush and Republican loyalist who served as official
elector for Bush in 2000. He might have expressed resentment of Arkansas , on whose behalf Cummins was nudged aside. Instead, here's what he said of his onetime aide: "Tim did a good job when he worked in the office. He worked hard. He took a real leadership role. He did a good job as a prosecutor. I certainly don't take issue with any of Tim's credentials for this job…. I feel very comfortable saying that." (For more on Griffin 's superior qualifications, see the excellent accompanying piece on the Spectator website today by Kane Webb.) Griffin
While Cummins ended up not leaving the
USAjob of his own volition, he said he had spoken a number of times to about his intentions to do so, and probably mentioned it casually to others at the Justice Department along the way. "There is no question that my wife and I had talked it over….Right about a third to a half of the U.S. Attorneys I had started with in 2001 had moved on….I had a willingness and intention to leave in the time frame of early 2006, but my First Assistant became ill, and subsequently died, and it just seemed a bad time to leave." Griffin
Still, he was surprised when Justice officials called him and told him he should step aside. He expected to leave under his own terms. Nevertheless, "I worked hard to make it a smooth transition. I went to pretty great pains to make it a situation that represented what should have happened instead of what actually happened. I mean, as far as I can tell, all of us [the fired USAs] were going away like good soldiers. But this wasan unprecedented move. I'm not aware of any president before who removed his own appointees without malfeasance."
But he and
worked out a transition plan, and things seemed basically okay — until Gonzales told Congress that all the replacements were made because of issues of poor management or the like. Suddenly, the good soldier found himself chafing as his own performance was publicly questioned. When McNulty then repeated the explanation in more explicit terms, while specifically exempting Cummins from the criticism, Cummins was quoted in the press as defending the reputation of the other fired USAs. He received a phone call from McNulty's chief of staff Michael Elston which, according to Cummins, seemed like a thinly veiled threat to escalate the public criticism of him and the other seven if they didn't stay quiet. Griffin
That was the last straw. Cummins testified before Congress to that effect, and on Wednesday he told me he blamed "certainly the attorney general [Gonzales] and the deputy attorney general [McNulty] too. Paul McNulty, especially, as a former U.S. Attorney himself, should have seen that the public explanation of the firings were inadequate on their face, specious on their face….It's just wrong. These people are being disparaged wrongfully."
ALL OF WHICH SHOWS a severe lack of political tact by the Gonzales team. There is nothing wrong with wanting new blood after four years or six years. The president never spends a lot of time explaining Cabinet replacements whenever he makes them. If handled one by one instead of as an attention-getting group of eight replacements in very short order, the changes would have attracted little attention. As well they should have, because there is no inherent scandal in such replacements.
Instead, the administration created its own quicksand and stepped right into it.
It did so even in the case of the loyal Cummins, who showed every intention of going quietly into the night. The press and the cut-throat left, predictably, homed in on the utterly innocent appointment of Griffin and used it to wrongly infer that Rove's supposedly evil hand was responsible for all eight firings, and to further infer (or in some cases say outright) that by very virtue of his association with Rove, Griffin was no more than a political hack. The truth, of course, is the opposite (again, see Kane Webb's article): that
Griffinwas a Rove favorite because was so talented. Griffin
All of which means that what should have been a simple set of administrative changes — some perhaps wise, some almost certainly not, but none of them nefarious — instead is dominating headlines and treated as a scandal. That is not the legacy of a tremendously competent attorney general.
is keeping his head low. Reached by phone yesterday morning, he would say next to nothing. Finally he offered this, almost wistfully: "I was honored to be offered the post and I was honored to accept. Despite all the criticism, I just want to stay focused and try to do the best job I can." Griffin
That's what Cummins was doing, too, and what Kevin Ryan in
was trying to do, and what Kyle Sampson was in his own way trying to do. Now they all are victims of a "scandal" that should not have snared them. San Francisco
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online