The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

In Fairness to John Dewey

His show trials commission and Sidney Hook. Also: Ben Stein and Obama’s latest war. Pawlenty and Franken. Plus more.

DEWEY OUT OF STEP
Re: Paul Kengor’s Dewey’s Disciples: From Madison to Maryland and Beyond:

Paul Kengor’s article is perceptive as always.. But in all fairness to John Dewey, he should have mentioned that while Dewey was pro-Soviet in the 1920s, in the 1930s he chaired the Dewey Commission (“Committee of Inquiry into Charges Made Against Leon Trotsky in the Moscow Trials”), which published a 400 page book, Not Guilty, exonerating Trotsky of all the charges made against him by the Soviet regime, and exposing the Moscow Trials as a farce and an outrage. Today it’s hard to imagine how any sane person could defend the Moscow Trials, but in the late 1930s the argument was that if you criticized the Trials, you became anti-Stalin, and therefore pro-Hitler. This argument was advanced, for example, by Will Herberg (who went on to become a distinguished conservative thinker and contributor to National Review), who maintained that even if Trotsky didn’t actually collaborate with Hitler, his ideas pointed in that direction, so he was “objectively” guilty as charged! Of course, once Dewey came out in defense of Trotsky, the entire communist propaganda machine was turned against him. This incredible story is brilliantly told in Sidney Hook’s memoir, Out of Step. (Sidney was the world’s most vigorous anti-Stalinist, but he was also a devoted follower of John Dewey; indeed, he was called “Dewey’s bulldog.”) 
— Joseph Shattan

Paul Kengor replies:
I’m honored to get a response from Joe Shattan, whose excellent book, Architects of Victory: Six Heroes of the Cold War, I’ve used in my classes at Grove City College.

Yes, Dewey did considerably better when it came to the Trotsky trials, which is a complicated subject, and didn’t necessarily put Dewey in the camp of stalwart anti-communist — though it did make Dewey anti-Stalin. The professor’s actions were more in protest of Stalin rather than communism in general. Where Dewey stood on communism by the end of his life is another of those maddening aspects of Dewey and his writings that’s exasperatingly difficult to pin down.

In April 1934, Dewey produced an essay titled, “Why I Am Not a Communist,” published in Modern Monthly, and quickly thereafter (same year) reprinted in hardcover in a printed symposium edited by Sidney Hook. Dewey actually wrote the piece in 1933, and said it was the culmination of “reservations” that had begun to swirl in his mind back in 1931. Yet, it was clear from the essay that Dewey’s problems were not so much with “communism” as a philosophy as much as official “Communism” as it was being pursued by Communist regimes at the time — a reference to Stalin’s current Russia. As the professor put it, he objected to “Communism, official Communism, spelt with a capital letter.” It was not so much the ideology as the ideology being put into practice.

In fact, Dewey is such a remarkable story, requiring so much detail, that I went through this full history in my book, Dupes. There, I did three chapters on Dewey, after initially thinking I would need only one.

That said, none of this takes away from the central point in my article, which is that Dewey and the Bolsheviks formed a mutual admiration society in the 1920s, and specifically on educational policy, and his educational ideas in particular. They loved his work, and he was flattered by their appreciation. That both sides saw such a perfect fit is not good news for our educators who have been busy implementing Dewey in America for 100 years now — or, at least, it wouldn’t be good news if they actually knew about it.

DEPARTMENT OF AMPLIFICATION
Re: Roger Kaplan’s Moving On With Moammar:

My contribution of March 21 mentioned an Algerian political figure, Ahmed Benbitour, born 1946, whom I described as a former prime minister and a leader of the new Alliance for Change. I should have added that although he hails from Ghardaia in the northern Sahara (sometimes described as the beginning of the Algerian south), a preponderance of whose inhabitants are Berbers of the Mozabite sect, Benbitour himself is neither a Mozabite nor a Berber, but rather a member of the Chaambas, who are an Arab tribe. I thank the editors for inserting this detail. Relations between Chaambas and Mozabites are at best fraught, and there were eruptions of violence in the city of Berriane, a major center in Ghardaia, in 2008 and 2009.
— Roger Kaplan

ON ALERT
Re: Grover Norquist’s The Battle Moves to the States:

A great article today, but remember that it won’t just be the entrepreneurs that Texas attracts. Parasites need healthy hosts. Eventually the hangers-on will follow the productive class to the more prosperous states as well, but will bring their old thinking with them and change the voting demographic. The states with Republican majorities need to act now to institutionalize their productivity. Governor Walker is a good example of this, but even a state like Texas should lock in its small government now via its state constitution. Don’t just assume that an enlightened electorate is the only safeguard you need.
— David Barnes

THE SMALLEY FACTOR
Re: Nicole Russell’s Sam’s Club President:

Pawlenty is a gutless piece of crap who either ran away from the Dems when they engineered their putsch back in Nov. ‘08 giving us Senator Stuart Smalley and in essence guaranteed Obamacare, or if you prefer, was Pontius Pilate washing his hands while American patriot Norm Coleman got crucified AFTER WINNING that election. Heck, this little Timid Timmy has NEVER addressed the subject of his cowardice, not even in his self-serving book, and yet you and others buy the myth this RINO is churning out about being a “Conservative.”

Pawlenty is a coward and a liar, just like Obama. Difference is, we know what we’re getting with Barry Boy. We don’t know how Timid Timmy will hold up…if he couldn’t stand firm and resolute in 11/08 how do we know he’ll be any different in the Oval Office?

No thanks, Timmy. Go back to being a wimp and washing your hands like a good little boy. And American Spectator, please don’t give him any more publicity. Thank You.
Alan Rockman
Phoenix, Arizona

Page: 1 2 3  

Letter to the Editor View all comments (7) |

Pecos Pete| 3.28.11 @ 7:27AM

Michael Harrison (above) says: "What low tax rates do for the rich is enable them to retain more wealth, not spend it."

Question for Mr. Harrison: Where, exactly, do the rich put the wealth they have retained?

Maybe they put it in coffee cans where inflation will reduce their wealth to zero.

Inquiring minds want to know.

Stuart Koehl| 3.28.11 @ 9:33AM

Never mind that: Given that those making more than $250,000 per year pay close to 50% of all income taxes, just what does Mr. Harrison think would be "their fair share"?

Just why do all these levelers seem to come from basket-case states like Pennsylvania, anyway?

Alan Brooks| 3.29.11 @ 12:40AM

Trotsky was a bad guy as well, he wanted what was tantamount to an infant-leftist revolution all over the world-- he was a boon to the Nazis; embarrassing that the #2 Bolshevik was Jewish.
Too bad Trotsky and Stalin didn't off each other in the '20s or before.

Dee See| 3.28.11 @ 7:47AM

US education has been re-engineered away
from education ----and toward economy use
and 'training' It's the Soviet polytech style.
It's really the brainchild of the HG Wells/Fabian
crowd, seeded, funded and set-up through the
EUGENIST 'benny-violent' capstone foundations
and their legions of NGOs and proxies.

They OWN education and no one gets anywhere
without their approval and support.

NOT UNTIL we have come to grips with this reality, and the staggering church and state issue
of the Social Darwinist, Luciferian occult societies
that lie behind all of it ---will anything change.

HUAC meets NUREMBERG ---get your tickets
now!

ENOUGH ROPE| 3.28.11 @ 11:18AM

Mr. Kengor,

What should be done about our public schools? Should public schools be eliminated entirely and replaced by private secular schools and private religious schools? If that were done it would defund the left and end the brainwashing of our students

Stormy| 3.28.11 @ 11:51AM

Michael Harrison suffers from the flawed mindset of Marxism. He seems to be ignorant of the fact that income and wealth acquired legally belongs to those that earn it. He, like all Marxists, such as Michael Moore, believe that the money belongs to the government, and "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need".

Mr. Harrison, no government that has actually practiced Socialism, Marxism, or Communism, take your pick, has ever been sustaining. The only thing that economic philosophy has ever produced is misery, at least for those that survived.

Creative Recreation | 8.10.11 @ 11:21PM

is good

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/03/28/in-fairness-to-john-dewey

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Pick Obama's Brain

Paul Kengor | 5.16.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Pray and Grow Rich

Christopher Orlet | 5.16.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT