For liberal activists, ObamaCare is just the end of the beginning. Live from Netroots Nation.
LAS VEGAS — The new national health care law may represent the largest expansion in the role of government since the Great Society, but for liberal activists, it was just the appetizer.
Here at the annual Netroots Nation conference for self-described progressives, organizers discussed their strategy for pushing toward their ultimate goal of a fully government-run, or single-payer, health care system.
To reach the promised land, they first have to protect the gains they’ve already made.
“People really want to run from the (health care) issue because of what happened with the populists, because of the way people were attacked, and it is the number one attack being used by conservatives on the right against anyone on the left, whether they voted for the bill or not,” explained Melinda Gibson, an organizer for the liberal group Health Care for America NOW!
HCAN was founded in 2008 as a coalition of unions and other groups, pledging to spend $40 million on grassroots organizing and advertising campaigns to push national health care. Despite their best efforts, at last August’s town hall meetings, liberal groups were out-hustled on the ground by a surge of Tea Party protesters who raised hell about the pending legislation.
“We have to make sure we don’t lose August,” Gibson emphasized. “August is crucial. People who experienced August last year will remember that we lost the media narrative for a long time, things were blown up on the ground, our organizers were in a defensive posture, and so it’s very important that we go on the offensive.”
It’s a long road ahead for liberal activists, she said, referencing data from the group Working America, which has been doing voter contact with Americans for the left.
“The health care conversations they’re having are very difficult,” she explained. “People are very defensive and afraid, and it’s taking a long time to break through some of that with various constituencies.”
While she predicted that the health care law would become more popular as Americans begin to receive government checks and enjoy other new benefits, in the meantime, she argued, liberals were planning on changing the “frame” of the conversation.
“The moral of the story at this point is we have to attack back,” she said. “And we have to attack and pivot. The question is not, ‘let’s get into a discussion of the nuances of the bill, or the implementation of it’ on the ground at this point.”
Instead, she put the issue in Bush-like terms: “Either you’re with the American people, or you’re with the insurance companies.”
At one point, Gibson suggested tactics such as following an insurance executive from her “fancy” house to “fancy” lunches to make her hated by Americans.
The new anti-corporate message, she said, could be deployed throughout the battle over implementation of ObamaCare, and “hopefully” lead to another push for the public option “that will get us further and further toward where we want to go.”
Another organizer on the panel, Andrew McGuire, expressed skepticism that any real change could happen at the federal level. As executive director of the California One Plan campaign, he’s part of the drive to bring single-payer health care to the Golden State.
His strategy involves getting Hollywood actors, writers, musicians, and comedians to join the fight along with grassroots and online activists. He predicted that single-payer would become a reality in California within the decade, and that other states would follow.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?