Transitory star power. Some unfaithful athlete. Global CO. Saving money on drugs. Plus more.
PRETTY FACE AND SILVER TONGUE
Re: William Tucker's Put
Men Back to Work:
Mr. Tucker was far too kind to Barack Obama when he wrote, "The President is being revealed for what he is -- an academically trained intellectual with a lot of abstract ideas who doesn't have much real feel for the country . . .,". At best Obama is a pseudo-intellectual with marginal or inflated academic credentials. Why do so many conservatives feel they must placate the left and fawn over this obviously inept buffoon? This is PC civility run amok. Obama is a failure who seems bent on destroying our economy and Constitution and it is time to call a spade a spade.
While pleased Sarah Palin is doing well on her book tour, in the
wake of her startling resignation as governor of Alaska,
shouldn't conservatives/Republicans move cautiously before
anointing her "savior" of the right? We need to learn from the
radical Democrats' mistake -- a pretty face and silver tongue do
not make a leader or President. Unlike independents and
populists, who are easily wowed by transitory star power
(illustrated by the Obama fad), conservatives should be judicious
and careful in selecting "leaders." This is particularly true in
the wake of the disaster that is called Obama "Presidency."
-- Michael Tomlinson
Jacksonville, North Carolina
"Our failure to adopt nuclear has reverberated through the economy."
No need to worry, Mr. Tucker. As this is written, lawyers and
community organizers in President Obama's administration are hard
at work on a perpetual motion machine.
-- Dan Martin
Pittsburgh
A TRULY BORING STORY
Re: Reid Collins' Tiger
Truth:
Enough, already! I am sick of the 24/7 coverage of this "story;"
there are more important things going on in the world than the
marital infidelity of one athlete. Tiger was a cad -- period, end
discussion.
-- Gretchen L. Chellson
Alexandria, Virginia
WORTH THE COSTS
Re: Lisa Fabrizio's Nuptual
Disagreements:
A radical suggestion: pay unto Caesar what is due Caesar and pay unto God what is due God.
The states have a Constitutional right to regulate contracts and religious institutions have the right to perform marriage rites, so take the state out of marriages completely. Have people make their contracts as they wish and then let them shop their contracts out to different churches, mosques, temples and other religious authorities and seek the sanctification of marriage. Some religious institutions will accept the contracts and others won't. If this is unacceptable to the Left, then they are out to destroy marriage for all in the guise of gay marriage as many on the Right believe. If this is unacceptable to the Right, then they are asking the government to impose their morality on minorities, and that would be inconsistent to their philosophy. Simple, no?
Chaos may reign for a while, but isn't freedom and honest worth
the cost?
-- I.M.Kessel
SAVE MONEY, LIVE BETTER
Re: Andrew Cline's
A Good Obama Flip-Flop:
Americans are subsidizing those countries that have drug price controls. Pharma makes extra profit in the USA to make up for less elsewhere. Americans should insist on paying the lowest prices they can get, and the market will then put pressure to allow prices to balance out, and Pharmas will then adjust. In practice, American prices will fall and Canadian prices will rise, profits will balance out between the two and Pharma will still develop new drugs as always. Nothing distributes resources more efficiently than the free market. Nothing.
As Walmart says , "save money , live better." Cline's all wrong
on this one.
--Edward
PUSHING ABORTION
Re: Brian Clowes's
Good for China, Good for the World?:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Stephen Zierak| 12.21.09 @ 10:04AM
Dear Mr. Tomlinson, the problem is, if not Sarah, then who exactly? It's not like there are tons of choices out there for conservatives and libertarians. That's why you see so many pro-Romney sentiments on this blog. When there are few alternatives, even someone who is a clear opportunist and would certainly govern to the left of either Bush becomes a possible choice to too many of us. Sarah has good American values, which she can explain in a clear and attractive manner. Of whom else among our worthies can we say the same?
IMKessel| 12.21.09 @ 10:16AM
Chaos may reign for a while, but isn't freedom and honest[y] worth the cost?
Please excuse the typo.
-- I.M.Kessel
P.S. Mr. Zierak has a point. Just because the media (i.e., the Left) continues to preach that Gov. Palin cannot win a general election is no reason to stop supporting her now. The 2012 is a long way off, and holy shades of Christmas past, the media reported Gov. Ronald Reagan as being being unelectable even after his "surprising" nomination by the GOP.
Margie| 12.21.09 @ 11:32AM
Looks like Sarah Palin may be too conservative for Michael Tomlinson. Using the same lame excuse to discount her as the Third Partiers. Too bad!