Greg Ballard captured the national spotlight in 2007 when he
managed to defeat the re-election bid of the Indianapolis Bart
Peterson, one of the rising superstars on the national Democratic
Party scene. With just $300,000 in campaign donations, little
support from the local Republican establishment, and the heckling
of local news outlets, the former marine colonel — selected
after the GOP failed to field a single candidate for its primary
— Ballard managed to end the aspirations of U.S. Sen. Evan
Bayh’s protégé.
On the national scene, Peterson was
lauded by centrist Democrats and
school reform activists for becoming the first mayor in America
to authorize charter schools. But for city residents, Peterson
stood out for his inability to end an eight-year spate of rising
crime, ineptitude in addressing vagrancy and vandalism, and
unwillingness to end corporate welfare for the NFL’s Indianapolis
Colts and the NBA’s Indiana Pacers. He also angered residents by
levying an array of tax increases — including a 65 percent hike
in the local income tax — and, as in a $100 million pension bond
float, by borrowing heavily against future tax revenues.
Ballard managed to end Peterson’s tenure and restore
Indianapolis to its storied position as one of the few big cities
under Republican control by promising to reverse the tax
increase, exercise fiscal prudence, and address the very quality
of life problems Peterson neglected. In the process, he won the
support of community activists, homeowners groups, grassroots
Republicans, and muckrakers who tangled with Peterson during his
second term.
Proclaimed lawyer and
blogger Gary Welch, whose Advance Indiana site championed Ballard
during the campaign: “He is the right man at the right time given
to us to correct the mistakes of the past and put us back on the
right path.”
But two years later, Ballard’s grassroots supporters accuse
him of being “disgusting” and of “abandoning” Republican
principles by failing to roll back the income tax increase. He
has also taken flack for successfully pushing an $8 million
increase the city’s hotel and beverage sales taxes. The latter
move, along with a loan from Indiana’s state government, will
help bail out the city’s Capital Improvement Board, operator of
the city’s two horse barn-like sports complexes. Declared Welch
in a recent post: “[Ballard] devotes all of his energies to
raising taxes for the billionaire sports team owners.”
Ballard isn’t the first mayor to be disappointing to
grassroots allies. Given the group of equally uninspiring
aspirants, Ballard may still limp his way into a second term. But
for a politician with few sources of long-term political support
among more-established political constituencies, betraying
promises to grassroots activists, and ditching Republican values
isn’t the way to win re-election. As shown by chief executives as
varied as former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Ballard’s
fellow Hoosier, Gov.
Mitch Daniels, it pays to stick to
one’s agenda.
WITH ITS SPARKLING DOWNTOWN HOTELS, the presence of the
state government and thriving hometown firms such as healthcare
giant WellPoint and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis isn’t wrestling with
the same levels of blight and mayhem plaguing sister Rust Belt
cities such as Cleveland and Detroit. But the city is no longer
resistant to urban decay.
Not far from the Soldiers and Sailors Monument in
University Park, vagrants drink, smoke, and loiter next to the
statue of onetime U.S. vice president Schuyler Colfax. Just
outside the downtown on the Near-Northside, abandoned and
burned-out homes are as much of the landscape as the city’s Fall
Creek. On the city’s Westside, middle class residents drive out
of their tony condominiums to work and past an increasing number
of half-empty strip malls, seedy strip joints, and neon-lit check
cashing outlets.
At the very least, Ballard can claim to have steadied the
city’s homicides — 114 of them were reported last year versus a
near-record 153 two years earlier. But incidents of other
reported crimes, including aggravated assaults and robberies,
remain near all-time highs. The police department has been busy
struggling with scandals within its own ranks. This includes
federal convictions against two officers for shaking down drug
dealers, and news that 50 off-duty cops worked for a local scrap
metal firm now under indictment for receiving stolen cars and
pilfered aluminum siding.
Embracing the pursuit of government efficiency and
privatization that was a hallmark of his more-successful
predecessor (and current Harvard University professor) Stephen
Goldsmith, Ballard has convened an “Infrastructure Advisory
Commission” that is spearheading a likely re-privatization of the
city’s water and sewer system. It has already received bids from
several companies — including Australian-Spanish consortium
Macquarie-Cintra, which has helped a string of politicians,
notably Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and Gov. Daniels, with their
lease of much-neglected highways. Ballard also successfully
eliminated the city’s nine township-level property tax assessors
and consolidated their operations into a countywide
office.
But it is the promises not kept that have exposed Ballard
to scorn. The mayor, once a staunch opponent of tax increases,
now champions an initiative by the city’s hospital agency to
replace its 17-building campus — which boasts the state’s
highest safety and health accreditation — with a spanking new
$754 million complex. Opponents of the plan complain that the
plan will pile another $29 million a year in property taxes onto
homeowners just as they have begun absorbing a decade of two-fold
hikes. Ballard also increased city water and sewer rates by 11
percent even as the state’s utility commission declared that his
administration didn’t attempt any cost-cutting efforts. In
September, the mayor proposed another as-yet unspecified rate
hike.
But it’s the bailout of the city’s convention and stadiums
agency that has earned Ballard the most vitriol from friends and
foe alike. The effort was prompted in part by the agency’s
decision to absorb $15 million in cost increases at Conseco
Fieldhouse that would have otherwise been absorbed by the Pacers.
By the way, the Pacers are owned by the estate of
recently-deceased mall baron Mel Simon and his brother Herb (who
is worth $1.3 billion, according to
Forbes).
The causes of the bailout, along with memories of past
subsidies and angst over the newly-built $720 million Lucas Oil
Stadium won Ballard no cheers. Nor did his ham-handed efforts
before skeptical state legislators and Gov. Daniels (who, having
helped back the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium, was forced to
bless the mess). Wrote local radio talk show host Abdul
Hakim-Shabazz: “[Ballard’s administration] did not do a very good
job of making the public case for a solution.”
CERTAINLY BALLARD IS WRESTLING WITH fiscal problems that
have begun crippling the city long before he took office. A
merger of the city government with that of Marion County in 1970
under the so-called Unigov plan, failed to fully integrate the
city’s archaic sprawl of government operations, police
departments, and township governments. Decisions by three
generations of city officials have ignored the need to fully fund
pensions for police and firefighters, add enough police officers
to keep up with population growth, and improve aging
sewers.
An additional burden was introduced in the late 1960s, when
city officials such as future U.S. Senator Richard Lugar began
luring sports teams, exhibitions, and eventually the NCAA, with a
string of new stadiums, training centers, and subsidies. The
deals have saddled taxpayers with millions in debt service and
steadily increasing taxes — and focused the minds of his
predecessors on matters that have little to do with improving
quality of life.
Ballard could have chosen a different path. Instead, he has
followed their example in a uniquely tone-deaf style. This past
June, as he pitched his stadium agency bailout to state and local
leaders, he shut down pools in the city’s parks. Although a
sensible move — the pools were leaking water after years of
neglect — the manner in which Ballard carried it out didn’t
endear him to local families.
He has also exposed himself to the same charges of “country
club” living that he decried during his campaign. Last December,
the mayor spent $30,000 in taxpayer dollars to fund an economic
development trip to China; previous mayors used private
fundraising for similar junkets. Then in August, Ballard revealed
that he received a free membership to a sanctuary for local
powerbrokers, the Columbia Club, which usually costs more than
$2,100 a year to maintain (on top of a $1,500 initiation
fee).
At this rate, Ballard may blunder himself out of the
country club and the mayor’s office altogether.
Pingback| 10.29.09 @ 7:14AM
My Horse Training » Blog Archive » The Accidental Mayor – Spectator.org links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
John - TMF| 10.29.09 @ 8:37AM
An former county supervisor (often the lone Republican in days gone by) told me a few interesting things during the run up to the 2000 election.
One of the little aphorisms that he taught me was, "[t]he difference between running for things and running things is not the preposition."
What Republicans (and/ or more pointedly movement conservatives) want to do, and what CAN be done is often at great odds.
I have seen smart policies put into place (privatization of bus maintenance for a local school district) only to have the sabotaged by poor specification, subterfuge, shifting standards, and impossible demands... all for the political purpose of regaining the task as a function of government.
I have seen big developers quietly fund candidates who claim one thing, and then take their position at the policy table as puppet of those special interests.
I have seen good politicians stay good, and as true to their word as they could be, and get tossed out of office, excoriated as being inflexible, unintelligent, and so on... They left public life, smeared and ruined by lies, never return.
I don't know all of the facts on the ground in Indianapolis. I figure that it is fundamentally a corrupt, putrid, vile, squalor plagued city, like all other cities.
I also figure that you have the condition of a mayor who is undermined by intrenched interests, cajoled by campaign money, pirques, and held hostage by a fundamentally dependent, property poor, wage serf voter base.
Frankly there is no winning. Conservatives will hate you because you haven't a prayer of keeping many campaign promises... and Liberls will hate you because well, Liberals hate everything.
It's a shame...
The final truth is the most important aphorism that the old guy taught me...
"You can't play if you don't win."
Something conservatives never learn, and the Libs have engraved on their foreheads, backwards, so they can see it when they study themselves in the mirror.
r/The Mighty Fahvaag
Bob Miller| 10.29.09 @ 11:10AM
We need an honest cost-benefit analysis of Indy's largesse to professional sports teams.
Nick| 10.29.09 @ 1:22PM
Just more proof that you don't have to go to D.C. to be "Beltway-ized."
shoey| 10.29.09 @ 2:26PM
this proves to me that the only answer is to drastically cut the size of the Government at ALL levels. even when we get someone who would like to change things, they can easliy be derailed and humilated by the entrenched beauracracy, unless they are very smart and very committed.
we need street-fighters and rabble-rousers, ppl who will throw punches instead of take them.
all this talk about be calm and moderate is just a tactic used by those to don't really want anything to change.
Mark| 10.29.09 @ 3:14PM
Indianapolis had several decisions to make a few years back. Marion county needed a new jail, they needed to update the sewer system (went to the July 4th celebration down town, and the smell of raw sewage was every where), they needed a new way to calculate property taxes, the surrounding areas outside of center circle was decaying from years of neglect. So, what did they do, ignored all those problems, put all the money and built a new stadium for the Colts despite what the citizens wanted, updated the areas again around center circle, and raised taxes again, while taking property away from its citizens to build the new stadium. Indianapolis has become the joke of the state of Indiana and theposter child of the arrogance of "politically correct". Glad I moved away from the mess.
Royce Davis| 10.29.09 @ 4:55PM
Great post by John. He is absolutely right.
F. Dillon| 10.29.09 @ 7:13PM
This is a really cheap hit piece. Just a few points...Ballard did not start the custom of Indianapolis subsidizing the owners of sports teams... that began in a predecessor's term who was not a Republican. The Capital Improvement Board people who set in motion the current subsidy scheme have left Ballard and his people holding the bag, and Ballard is trying to deal with it in really tough economic times. He also is grappling with a lot of other problems, sewerage and the decrepit county hospital system for example, which mayors all the way back to Lugar have completely blown off or band-aided... He is trying to deal with it. And the fix for things like the sewers is going to be in the tens of billions of dollars, in part because of the neglect the Indianapolis infrastructure suffered under many previous mayors of both parties. Let's see.. when it comes to empty strip centers, well, to blame that on the mayor is beyond ludicrous. Try reading a paper Mr. Biddle, or getting on the internet, to discover other reasons why there are vacant commercial real estate properties all over the country, not just in Indianapolis... reasons like the depression that we are in, which was caused in part by the Community Reinvestment Act and other progressive policies of the opposition party. Ballard had nothing to do with any of it. Hmm...Vagrants in University Park... have been there since I was a little kid in Indianapolis, that would be 40 years ago. They appear better fed, more sober, better clothed and more polite today than then. And my guess is that they have been there since before the Civil War. To blame their existence and the murder and other serious crime rates in the city month-to-month, to blame the existence of check-cashing storefronts, and to blame urban decay (which Indianapolis has surprisingly little of) on Ballard is just lame. But the silliest implication in this article is that there is some kind of impropriety by the mayor having received some honorary membership in the old Columbia Club (current value $120 dollars; they are having a membership drive this month). Mayors, pastors, and others have traditionally been given this microperk. To belittle him for taking this is petty and reveals your hatchet-job motivation. Likewise, to spend only $30,000 for a trade promotion trip to China on behalf of the city sounds like good stewardship to me. Gee, you think it might lead to some local contracts with big Chinese companies? Maybe worth more than the cost of the trip? Mr. Biddle, overall a cheesy hit piece on a good person, a former Marine officer, a Christian and a graduate of Indianapolis Cathedral High School. Shame on you sir. Why don't you expose real criminals and tyrants like Rangel, Emmanuel, Frank, Pelosi, and Obama. If you want to stay closer to home go muck rake in the Region or in Chicago. Lots of criminals up there. Happy hunting.
tyler| 11.1.09 @ 9:58PM
I don't buy johns argument. In fact everything the first person commenting on this article said is not a fact and is in fact his opinion. Have some faith for0gods sake. This guy in indianapolis is an idiot. You really shouldn't be making excuses for him.
comprar| 1.20.10 @ 2:00PM
When you raise taxes and increase vandalism, the policy that is bad or are bad people who do it. Regardless of the political tendency of every ruler and the shirt he wears.
comprar camisetas
Pingback| 3.30.10 @ 11:06AM
Health reform’s immediate impact: Your benefits | EmploymentSeek.info links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: