What is the joy that belief kills?
British atheists have paid to have buses carry advertisements saying: “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.” Professor of Atheism Richard Dawkins, a geneticist by training, is a major supporter of this campaign and has put quite a lot of his own money into it. (A much humbler figure, a bus driver, has possibly made a bigger sacrifice by refusing to drive buses bearing the message, but that’s another story.)
In America a similar campaign of bus ads reads: “”Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness’ sake!” while leaving the definition of what would be “good” in a world without a god rather unclear (though it is true that Marxism and Nazism gave us some idea).
Writing in the Daily Express, former British Conservative government minister and Catholic Ann Widdecombe has remarked that this advertisement is strange. She says:
If, as C. S. Lewis said in The Weight of Glory, we believe that we and our neighbors were created by God to live forever, we will treat ourselves and one another differently. But it actually goes further than this. If man had in the past taken to heart the injunction that “There’s probably no God,” not only would there be no hope of eternal Salvation, and no fixed ground for morality, but there would also be no art, science or civilization.
Western art grew from our religion and a striving to illuminate and understand mankind’s relationship with God. So did non-Western art — the pyramids, the Norse sagas, the statues of Easter Island and a number of other things that enrich our lives. Even cave-art was almost certainly related to the supernatural. Belief produced Michelangelo’s Pieta and the Sistine Chapel, Leonardo’s The Last Supper, the great Cathedrals of Europe, the works of Dante, Shakespeare, Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, and virtually every great masterpiece.
Modern atheist art has produced the pickled cows and sharks of Damien Hirst, the soiled bed-linen of Professor Tracey Emin, and, in literature, the mumblings and ravings of Samuel Beckett and Harold Pinter, attempts to portray a meaningless world. Socrates and Plato, pagans but believers in a god, laid the foundations of Western philosophy, including its humanistic aspects. Atheism produced the meaninglessness and worse of Nietzsche, an unintentional progenitor of Nazism, and then of Sartre, spiritual father of the Pol Pot Genocide, as atheism produced Communism in general, responsible for about 100 million deaths and ruined lives beyond count.
Supernatural aspects aside, what these bus ads seem to actually promise and hold out to us is at best a world and a vision of dullness and drabness, from which color, splendor and even interest has been largely excluded, at worst something a great deal more terrible.
Further, and as is not emphasized enough, not only Western art and thought, but also Western sciences and technology, are the products of Judaism and Christianity, the one religious tradition which welcomed and exalted reason, as it exalted art, for the greater glory of God.
The first industrialization of Europe, with water wheels replacing slaves driven by the lash, was the work of monks. The Romans knew of water wheels, but made only a small number, even at times when they were apparently short of slave labor. By the Middle Ages, thanks to the monasteries, there were thousands of water-wheels and windmills, helping free humans, and indeed some animals, from lives of dull and torturous drudgery. One medieval monk wrote a poem celebrating the fact that, with the harnessing of water-power, horses’ backs no longer need be broken.
Monks also put books into their modern form, replacing scrolls, and making possible printing. They designed and instituted public clocks and raised agriculture to a science. They preserved the heritage of the classical world through the Dark Ages: the art and science of Greece and the technology of Rome. Previously, when in ancient times civilizations had fallen, all the small store of knowledge which they had painfully scraped together had been lost with them (the Greeks of Homer’s time and of classical antiquity had no idea that civilizations had existed in the Mediterranean before them). The monks of Europe were responsible for not only innumerable inventions but for their application to improve life, and on an organized, institutional basis, making the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages the first great era of rapid human advancement.
Christianity, which, with its obvious close links to the Jewish Rabbinical tradition and ethic, had been founded by a carpenter, and whose first leading figures included a tent-maker, a doctor and fishermen, was a religion, and created a culture, which honored men who did things. This was a great change from the great civilizations of the past, including Egypt, Greece and Rome, where the artisan was despised and had a status little if any better than a slave. Greek science tended to concentrate on gentlemanly occupations like astronomy and geometry, though astronomy could not progress far because it was beneath them to make lenses. (One can imagine Archimedes holding his nose as he made war-engines.) Saint Paul, with the injunction to use the things that are visible to discover the things that are invisible, may be seen to have specifically endorsed science and technology, one of many things which made Christianity radically unlike any preceding religions or ethical systems.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?