By Philip Klein on 11.18.08 @ 6:10AM
Israel won't live with a nuclear Iran, and time is running out
for a diplomatic resolution.
Israel will not tolerate a nuclear Iran and is prepared to take
military action to prevent the possibility of the Islamic regime
obtaining such weapons should diplomacy fail, according to a
senior Israeli security source.
"If you consider the prospect of military action, you have to
consider the alternative of a nuclear Iran, and that reality is
worse than the consequences of any military action," the source
said in an interview conducted last week in Tel Aviv.
In the United States, there is a vibrant debate over how
seriously to take the threat of Iran becoming a nuclear power. In
the wake of the Iraq War, there is little appetite among
Americans to launch a military strike on another nation in the
Middle East in the name of preventing it from obtaining weapons
of mass destruction. Some American analysts argue that the
Iranian regime would never risk its own demise by using nuclear
weapons, and they have dismissed Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's declaration that Israel should be "wiped off the
map" as mere rhetoric.
But in Israel, the issue is a lot less muddy. While dangers from
Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist groups persist, a nuclear
Iran would threaten Israel's very existence. A majority of the
country's population resides on a narrow strip of land along the
coast, north and south of Tel Aviv, making the prospect of a
nuclear blast in the area catastrophic. With the memory of the
Holocaust seared into the minds of Israelis, they don't have the
luxury of debating whether or not to take Ahmadinejad at his
word.
"There's no margin of error, because you can't take the risk that
they have the capability, and that it's only a matter of
intentions," the security source explained. Iran could decide
that they "have the ability to finish the Jewish problem once and
for all…so this is something we cannot tolerate."
The source said "the international community's pressure on Iran
isn't efficient" and predicted that "the window of opportunity
will close, and soon. We're not talking about decades, but years.
Perhaps months."
Asked specifically whether or not Israel would resort to military
action, the source responded by saying that "all the options are
on the table and relevant."
Noting reports that Iran had learned a lot from Israel's air
strike on Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 and had spread out its
nuclear facilities and buried them under bunkers, TAS
asked, "Do you think there is a viable military option?"
The source then repeated the earlier statement about keeping all
options on the table, but placed special emphasis on the words
"and relevant," later adding that, "there is a point that we may
be forced to take action because of the alternative."
Meanwhile, an Israeli official familiar with the ongoing
diplomatic efforts to prevent a nuclear Iran argued that there
were still tools that could be employed against Iran to resolve
the issue without military action, but said that at the moment,
Iran seems intent on continuing its nuclear program.
"You don't find a lot of countries on Earth as determined as
Iran," the official said.
According to the source, the combination of diplomatic and
economic warfare could be effective in thwarting the nuclear
ambitions of the Iranian regime, especially with the price of oil
declining, and given the fact that Iran imports a majority of its
refined oil. The problem is that at the moment, the UN Security
Council process remains "frozen" and Russia and China have
prevented sanctions that would have had more teeth.
Over the course of the campaign President-elect Barack Obama
called for engaging Iran, even famously vowing to hold
unconditional talks directly with President Ahmadinejad. The
position makes Israelis nervous because it could allow Iran to
buy more time to perfect its uranium enrichment capacity.
"Israel is not ideologically opposed to engagement, but we don't
want to put the cart before the horse," the official said.
Citing a recent report by the International Atomic Energy Agency,
the official explained that Iran had overcome many technological
challenges, and once it mastered the nuclear fuel cycle, it could
be well on its way to obtaining nuclear weapons should it decide
to go that route.
"Iran is trying to run out the clock, and the international
community keeps struggling for a magic formula, and it hasn't
found one yet," the official said.
topics:
Iran, Israel