The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Political Hay
Print Email
Text Size

Political Hay

Obama’s Society of Beggars

A community organizer's vision for America.

Oh pleeeeze, sir!

In three words, this is the driving force behind Barack Obama’s vision for America. A vision epitomized by the famous words written by Charles Dickens for the young Oliver Twist of 19th century England. “Please, sir, I want some more.”

As America is beginning to learn, the young prince of Chicago began his career as what is euphemistically called a “community organizer.” One has to have grown up in the 1960s, I suppose, to know what this is. For those who missed out, a community organizer is someone who spends their time begging from the government. The motives, at least in theory, are always pure. Mrs. Jones needs heat, Joe Smith needs a job, Sally Bell needs milk for her baby.

The problem, of course, is that after decades of practical experience it is now obvious to most Americans that the guiding light behind community organizing is some variant of socialism — which is to say a philosophy that effectively guarantees a lifetime of poverty and dependence, always at the mercy of a government that by the very nature of big bureaucracies can be arrogantly uncaring if not deceitful, slow as molasses, frequently incompetent and, in the end, completely lacking in an ability to help people escape the grinding poverty in which they find themselves.

Barack Obama made his first mark in Chicago by choosing to be a community organizer, inspired by left-wing theoretician Saul Alinsky, the so-called “father” of community organizing. As a United States Senator he has, according to the non-partisan National Journal, emerged as one of the Senate’s most liberal Senators. This is another way of saying that Obama supports all those programs that keep community organizers busy with places to go begging, insuring from the top that all those on the bottom are effectively kept in a closed loop of poverty. Unable to break out, poorly educated by government-owned, union-run local schools, housed in government-owned, crime-infested public housing, dependent for everything from food to heat to a job, the cycle rewards dependency. Dependency on government, and in turn dependency on community organizers like Barack Obama once was and on politicians like Barack Obama now is.

THE BEST PLACE to take a look at this cycle in terms of Obama is to read his writings and the glowing accounts in liberal journals that have been written about him by enamored journalists. They provide an X-ray of the way Obama sees what American life should be — a life that effectively consists of a society of beggars. Here are but four selections.

* From Ryan Lizza in the New Republic: “Obama’s work focused on helping poor blacks on Chicago’s South Side fight the city for things like job banks and asbestos removal.”

* From David Moberg in the Nation: “Often by confronting officials with insistent citizens — rather than exploiting personal connections, as traditional black Democrats proposed — Obama and DCP protected community interests regarding landfills and helped win employment training services, playgrounds, after-school programs, school reforms and other public amenities.”

* From David Moberg in the Nation: “One day a resident at Altgeld Gardens, a geographically isolated public housing project surrounded by waste sites, brought a notice about planned removal of asbestos from the project manager’s office. Obama organized the community to find out if there was asbestos in their apartments. They persisted as officials lied and delayed, then took a bus — with far fewer people than Obama had anticipated — to challenge authorities downtown. Ultimately, the city was forced to test all the apartments and eventually begin cleaning them up.”

* From Barack Obama in “Why Organize? Problems and Promise in the Inner City” first published in the August/ September 1988 Illinois Issues (published by then-Sangamon State University, which is now the University of Illinois at Springfield):

“This means bringing together churches, block clubs, parent groups and any other institutions in a given community to pay dues, hire organizers, conduct research, develop leadership, hold rallies and education campaigns, and begin drawing up plans on a whole range of issues - jobs, education, crime, etc. Once such a vehicle is formed, it holds the power to make politicians, agencies and corporations more responsive to community needs.”

Listen to what is being said here.

* “…fight the city for things like job banks and asbestos removal…”

* “Often by confronting officials…”

* “They persisted as officials lied and delayed, then took a bus — with far fewer people than Obama had anticipated — to challenge authorities downtown. Ultimately, the city was forced…”

Page: 1 2  

topics:
Taxes, Education, Health Care, Barack Obama, NATO, Socialism, Energy

About the Author

Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author. He writes from Pennsylvania at jlpa1@aol.com.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (3) |

Diana| 11.11.08 @ 12:54AM

I'll go along with your argument that "community organizing" and socialism create dependency on government and thus don't work, but your argument is based on old frames of reference when you apply them to how you think President-Elect Obama will govern this country. You apparently missed the trail of ideas Obama left behind on his road to the White House, or you might have noticed when he said that he realized "community organizing" doesn't work, and that this was one of the reasons he decided to run for political office.

Throughout his life and especially during this campaign, Obama has shown himself to be a pragmatist whose priority is solving problems by collaborating with others. While you cling to your ideology and obsess over old "isms," he moves beyond them to see what government must do in a time when the problems are so monumentally huge that no individual can solve them. "Government" to paraphrase Obama, "does what we cannot do for ourselves individually." We can't build roads or schools, we can't fill pot holes. And sometimes, we as a society, hit a concrete wall. Mistakes repeated often enough and long enough finally reach a peak of disaster. That's when government must step in to provide rescue action and steer a new course.

Now you can call that socialism, and continue to labor under the negative associations of the word, but I call it problem-solving, which is what governments are made to do.

Our taxes are not a give away, citizens are not ATM machines, we pay taxes with the tacit agreement that government will do things on behalf of the common good, especially when the individual would be crushed under the weight of the problem (e.g. Katrina).

Obama believes that a democratic government exists to serve the people, especially when there is trouble. Sometimes that trouble is collective, other times it is individual. Some people, for whatever reason, just fall through the cracks and need help to get back on their feet (unemployment ), or they are too old to walk on their feet anymore (social security). You call that socialism, I call it civilization. I would even go so far as to call it "Christian" ("Love thy neighbor as yourself").

You want government to run like a cold machine, utterly detached from the concerns of the citizens it is meant to serve, Obama knows that if government is not humanely responsive to its citizens it will fail.

We can have a free market economy without a free-for-all, we can have rugged individualism without being cast off to struggle on our own when the advantages are not equally available to each and everyone. If for no other reason than self-preservation, letting people fall off a cliff will only drag everyone down with them.

The rational seems to work for the bankers, why not for the people? Wall Street didn't seem to have any qualms or inhibitions about begging the tax payer for a $700 bailout (and are begging for "more"). The people don't have to beg, they can, and ought to demand, because it's their money. Tax payer money does not belong to the government, the government holds it in trust, for the people, or at least it ought to.

So the question comes down to, what is government for, why do we need it?

President-Elect Obama answered that question. You just weren't listening.

Occam's Tool| 11.2.12 @ 5:36PM

Diana:

after the horrific damage President Obama has done to our country over the last four years, with the TRILLIONS of dollars added to the deficit, the BEST unemployment statistic of his career being 7.8% (caused by massively massaged data), our credit rating being dropped, health insurance going HIGHER as a result of Obamacare with FEWER people covered, Iran on the verge of getting nukes, the Middle East taken over by Islamists, the European Union being a) taken over by Islamists and b) aging and shrinking and c) going bankrupt, and finally: our Ambassador being cornholed and murdered by Islamists on 9/11/12 and the government being COMPLETELY ineffective in the latest hurricane to hit our shores; after all that, don't you feel like a blithering idiot for posting this moronic missive above?

Related Articles

More Articles by Jeffrey Lord

More Articles From Political Hay

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/02/26/obamas-society-of-beggars

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT