in these debates, this one included: is he relevant? Is he necessary? Does he need to be here? Do the decisive debates need him? Do they need his answers? Fred’s hurdle is his answers are necessary but maybe he isn’t.
Richardson’s irrelevant except insofar as he funnels people to Obama. But the big story here is the Obama-Edwards tag team. I think I saw something much deeper than mere politicking going on in the buddy-buddy operation. Of course, politics is…
Words do matter, Hillary. He praises Bill Clinton, as he must, because Bill’s the greatest proof among Democrats that they do. I’ve said before that Obama’s Bill’s true heir, and this debate’s driving that home.
How long will it last? Edwards actually defends Obama’s lobbying reform efforts against Charlie Gibson. Hillary’s getting smaller and smaller.
“I’m glad that people like me, Hillary.”
“You’re likeable enough, Hillary.”
That’s the implication of his remark, yeah. But surely the Sunnis had/have the most to lose from an American pullout, and it only makes sense that an election-year result in favor of the pullout party at a time of heavy…
Who here thinks Hillary’s American dream has slipped away? Raise your hand if you think she’s done. <raising hand>
Edwards goes to bat for Obama. His logline for Clinton: When Forces of Status Quo Attack! UPDATE: an Obama-Edwards ticket? UPDATE 2: She’s getting strident.
