Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak is, in the estimation of most
intelligence agencies, close to the end of his life. Eli Lake has
a
long and important story in today’s Washington Times
on what is likely to happen next. You should read the whole story
for the details, but the upshot is that Mubarak would clearly
like his son Gamal Mubarak to inherit the country, but that
opposition forces, have, in the person of former International
Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradi, a credible leader
campaigning to open the Egyptian political system. In other
words, we’re at a hinge: The future of Egypt could be nepotistic
dictatorship, or it could be a bloodless transition toward a
nascent democracy.
This should hardly need spelling out, but it is very much in the
interest of the United States that the political culture of Egypt
be reformed. The current political culture — where grievances
are expressed with bombs, not ballots — is the one that produced
Egyptian Islamic Jihad, whose most radical members in turn formed
al-Qaeda. (The two organizations are now closely affiliated.) It
is the political culture that produced Mohammed Atta, who led a
team of hijackers to kill 2,976 civilians on American soil on
September 11, 2001.
Orienting American policy toward encouraging democratic reform in
Egypt ought to be a no-brainer. Mark Palmer, drawing on his
experience as ambassador to Hungary in the 80s, has written
passionately (in a book I
reviewed for AmSpec in 2003) of the usefulness of
turning embassies into ‘freedom houses,’ encouraging and aiding
democrats within closed societies. (In his book he tells of
bringing George H.W. Bush to meet Hungarian democracy activists
in 1989. Secretary of State James Baker —
a malign influence as usual — said at the time, “Mark, I
know these are your friends, but they will never run this
country.” They were, of course, running the country within a
year.) So, at this crucial moment in Egyptian history, how is our
embassy doing on this score? From the Washington Times
story:
The Obama administration ended support for a small fund
operated by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo that supported groups
promoting Egyptian democracy and that bypassed any clearance
from the Egyptian government.
Of course. Like the Syrians
I met in April, Egyptian democrats who deserve American
support can’t count on it under this administration. And if Gamal
Mubarak takes over and goes on to rule for decades through brutal
repression, creating fertile ground for the sort of frustrations
that drive young men to radicalism, and if more Americans die
because of it… well, at least we didn’t try to “impose our
values” like the oh-so-evil Bush administration would have done,
right?
MikeN| 7.19.10 @ 9:24PM
Shouldn't you try to deal with the fact that elections in Egypt saw the election of the Muslim Brotherhood?
Crooz8er| 7.20.10 @ 8:12AM
I don't get why Americans get all geeked up for "Arab dissidents" to whatever ruling muslim class in whatever muslim country we're talking about. They're MUSLIM, right? Does it make a difference if one group of America-hating, sharia-loving kooks is ruling a country or a different brand of America-hating, sharia-loving kooks is ruling?
Nabil El-Khodari | 12.4.10 @ 8:27AM
I believe the same attitude of James Baker is still governing US relations with Egypt forgetting that it is the US policy that ultimately maintains the regime in Egypt.
The US policy-makers should learn from their experience with the Shah of Iran. Egypt will eventually be governed by the Muslim Brotherhood - which is not as bad as it sounds - if the US continues its current policies towards Egypt.