-
Adieu, Adieu, Remember Me
March 25, 2011 | 38 comments
-
DeMint’s Defense of RomneyCare is Ignorant…And Dangerous
March 17, 2011 | 85 comments
-
McConnell Pushing Vote to Block the EPA from Regulating Carbon Emissions
March 17, 2011 | 9 comments
-
More Barbour on Afghanistan
March 16, 2011 | 8 comments
-
House Passes Three Week Spending Bill
March 15, 2011 | 8 comments
The Spectacle Blog
The NAACP will not release the actual text of its resolution condemning “racist elements” within the Tea Party movement until October, when the organization’s board gives it final approval, a spokesman for the group has told me.
Though the final version has not surfaced, I reported on some excerpts from the preliminary draft of the resolution yesterday, which I was able to record before a live webcast broadcasting the NAACP conference was cut off. Among other things, an early draft called Tea Party movement, a “threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.”
In a blog post on the passage of the resolution on its own website, the NAACP writes:
The proposed resolution had generated controversy on conservative blogs, where in some cases the language has been misconstrued to imply that the NAACP was condemning the entire Tea Party movement itself as racist.
But it seems to me that the ideal way to prevent the language from being misconstrued would be to release the actual language.
View all comments (88) | Leave a comment
More Blog Posts by Philip Klein
http://spectator.org/blog/2010/07/14/naacp-wont-release-text-of-tea
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
martin j smith| 7.14.10 @ 3:58PM
These people are cowards and liars. If they had any confidence in their precious resolution they would put it out. They are using it for the November elections which means a part of an October surprise ? We need spies to find out what games this group and Obama will play.
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 5:17PM
But if you don't like blacks you cannot be a Christian. The Bible reads "love thy neighbor"; not "love thy neighbor except for blacks"
Anyway, don't say very often say that "I have nothing against blacks", because then you protest too much."
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 5:19PM
... No one says you have to like blacks
but it cuts both ways:
they don't have to like you, either.
So you can't win-- you only think you are getting over on them.
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 5:39PM
Failed Liberal social policies trap many Black Americans on your dead and dying Liberal plantations also know as the inner cities.
The destruction of once great American cities Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, etc. are proof that Liberalism kills.
Unlike you, Alan, I am a Conservative and I judge people by the content of their character not their color.
Like all Liberals, Alan--you are a racist.
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 5:48PM
But your husband is white-- if you have a husband, Missy.
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 6:03PM
How do you know I'm white, bonehead?
And WHY do you care? Bigot.
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 7:12PM
Pushed your button, and you walked into the trap:
you don't think merely because I'm not Republican means I can't be mean-spirited?
And why is it a liability to be mean-spirited at AS or NR, or at any number of venues? when people become indignant, then they say what they REALLY think.
BTW, odds are you ARE white, Missy-- this isn't Ebony magazine.
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 7:18PM
... So even you can understand, Missy; I did not write you are white, I wrote that odds are you are white given the ratio of whites to nonwhites in the Republican Party-influenced conservative/rightwing blogosphere.
At any rate, if Mr. Tyrrell changes this magazine's name from American Spectator to American Kumbaya, then we'll all be NICE.
JmsA| 7.15.10 @ 11:26AM
Alan Brooks,
Look at what I found for you:
Various single-offender crime statistics in US in 2007:
Number of white-on-black rapes/sexual assaults: 0
Number of black-on-white rapes/sexual assaults: 14,093
Number of white-on-black robberies: 0
Number of black-on-white robberies: 69,293
Number of white-on-black violent crimes (with completed violence): 2,572
Number of black-on-white violent crimes (with completed violence): 122,767
Number of white-on-black violent crimes, total: 55,685
Number of black-on-white violent crimes, total: 433,934
Source: Table 42 from US Dept. of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2007 Statistical Tables.
Oh, wait, there's more: I just watched a surveillance video on the news of three thugs holding a gun to a man's head in the New York subway. Care to guess what the race of the criminals was versus that of the victim?
Quis est pessimus quam a simulator a bardus simulator.
George| 1.10.11 @ 4:59PM
For the bloody record - a history of racial oppression tends to lead some folks down the wrong path. Repeating these statistics without context is ludicrous. Why don't we count up the white on black crimes during the era of slavery?
George| 1.10.11 @ 4:59PM
For the bloody record - a history of racial oppression tends to lead some folks down the wrong path. Repeating these statistics without context is ludicrous. Why don't we count up the white on black crimes during the era of slavery?
Mark| 7.14.10 @ 11:51PM
What trap? Talk about obtuse! White or black, you are a silly, silly man.
Mark| 7.14.10 @ 11:51PM
What trap? Talk about obtuse! White or black, you are a silly, silly man.
Missy| 7.15.10 @ 12:10AM
Alan, you're such a silly goofball I never take you seriously. I mean--what would be the point?
Of course you're mean, you're a dummocrat.
Missy| 7.15.10 @ 12:23AM
Told you that you assumed I was white. Oops, you fell into my trap!
You're crazy, Alan.
Tim*| 7.14.10 @ 8:50PM
Should we believe Alan The Cracker , who elsewhere wrote ,
"... if we let the GOP slip (case in point: Uncle Tom Steele) in its own puddle, there is no reason to get angry. "
Alan is now in an argument with himself.
Apparently , he's quite conflicted & confused.
Alan Brooks| 7.15.10 @ 4:22PM
Confused, yes; with one side of their mouths Americans talk Bible; the other side it's hard-nosed I'm A Tough Customer Sport. I know they have to be that way so I'm not really angry, though; but am sad. I was gullible back when Reagan was prez, thought America would at least not be so trashy, as tasteless as it was back in the day.
But even Mencken didn't know how right he was.
Alan Brooks| 7.15.10 @ 4:28PM
btw Steele IS a token, he became RNC so for Repuglicans to have a Kept Boy who had had experience down on the ole plantation.
Interloper| 7.15.10 @ 4:42PM
Obama IS a token, moron.
Sean| 7.14.10 @ 4:13PM
October, eh? Right before the election, no doubt.
Sheesh.
John Coleman| 7.14.10 @ 4:43PM
If you go to their website, the first thing you see is a form to support this resolution. Why is it so acceptable to sign things that you cannot read. This is people willing to be blind and led by the inept and dishonest.
Nobama| 7.14.10 @ 5:47PM
Democrats hadn't read the 2 or 3 thousand page ObamaCare bill before they passed it; and Obama, Holder and Napolitano hadn't read Arizona's anti illegal immigration ill when they publicly trashed it.
Liberals don't care what's in a bill if they think it furthers their agenda. Morons.
barbara thomas | 7.14.10 @ 4:56PM
when will the smutts of the world shut up . go to the beach and enjoy the folly of your pres. tar balls could be racists
Reidracer| 7.14.10 @ 4:59PM
Sounds like Der Fuhrer's Health Care Bill..... ratify before READING....
It's probably written in ebonics anyway.
Dixie Pixie| 7.14.10 @ 5:23PM
Has anyone considered that for AG Holder to prosecute the TEA Parties, he needs a victim to avenge.
Is the NAACP is in the process of supplying that victim?
This October, just in time for the election, AG Holder will spring Federal lawsuits on the TEA Parties and personal. The lawsuits will cite the “objective and unbiased independence” of the NAACP as the authority supplying evidence of the TEA Parties racism. The TEA Party candidates will then be blindsided with charges condemning them with racism.
The idea is to duplicate the 2008 election when the voters were given the choice was between voting for Obama or be a Racist.
By charging the TEA Party candidates with the hate crimes of racism based on the NAACP charges, the Obama administration is giving the voters a choice between voting for Racism or voting for the Democratic candidates.
The NAACP actions are beyond sleazy. This is directly trying to manipulate the 2010 election by creating false and malicious charges. This is just like the Dan Rather charges against George W Bush only worse.
AG Holder does not expect the charges to stick. It is the seriousness of the charges inflicted just before the election is what the Democrats expect to turn the election around.
That is my speculation and theory. What is yours.
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 5:43PM
Whom would Holder prosecute and for what reason?
How can a whole group be prosecuted?
Last I checked, the 1st Amendment still protects Free Speech. Good luck with that, Holder.
Dixie Pixie| 7.14.10 @ 6:39PM
Greetings Missy
The whole idea is to selectively wipe out the TEA Party candidates with charges of Racism and hate crimes. After all, Obama became a US Senator by running all the other candidates out of the race with the tactics of the Chicago Way. Why not do it on a far more massive scale.
Does that clear up the concepts Missy?
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 6:58PM
Not really, it's not specific enough. The group is too diffuse to make the charges stick.
I understand your point, but I don't think Holder could make it work.
Nate| 7.14.10 @ 7:56PM
Dixie and Missy --
Would you relax? You sound like Glenn Beck for crying out loud. No one is going to prosecute tea baggers.
I would bet you a MILLION dollars (if I had it) that there is no one in DC more frustrated than Obama that the NAACP is making this proclamation. It is exactly the sort of politics Obama has avoided his entire career. For some reason people on the right seem to think that Obama is Jesse Jackson. He's not. Believe it. Jackson got -- what? -- 10% of the vote last time he ran: Obama defeated one of the most powerful people in DC for the nomination and won the presidency, and he didn't do it by gimmick politics.
Dixie Pixie| 7.14.10 @ 9:16PM
Nate --- Is that still you.
The last I heard of you, had gotten into flame war with Quin Hillyer and was being bludgeoned by facts, logic, history and reality. It was not pretty. I did not expect for you to survive. But You Lived to see another day.
Forget about the money.
If not, I would like it in large, sequentially numbered and UV marked bills.
Of course, Obama and Holder is involved with the NAACP.
All three have been joined at the political and rhetorical orifice for years.
Racism is the last and most despicable tactic of a failing Democratic politician.
The fact is the Obama Pollyanna Strategy is not working.
It is folly to try to convince to public today's economy is better than Bush 43's economy.
For example, 9.xx+% unemployment is not better than around 4% under Bush 43.
Nobody is buying the Pollyanna Strategy, so Obama pulled out the Racism Strategy.
It is that simple.
Moron| 7.15.10 @ 12:13AM
Nate's an Obama boot-licker; everything the moron says is suspect. He talks about teabagging a lot, too; wonder why?
Dixie Pixie| 7.15.10 @ 12:54AM
Greetings Moron
Have we never meet before?
Where there is life, there is hope.
I think Nate can be turned from the Dark Side to the White Light of Conservationism.
Maybe, Maybe not, but it is worth a try.
Moron| 7.15.10 @ 2:35PM
Have we ever "meet" before? I don't think so but you sound a little moronish yourself. :)
tonypal| 7.15.10 @ 9:27AM
Nate, a few points. First, they're called tea partiers, not teabaggers. People get to choose for themselves what they want to be called. For example, you refer to yourself as Nate, so when I address you, I address you as Nate. It would be childish of me to do otherwise, so grow up and stop the adolescent name calling.
Second, isn't it about time we put this whole Obama as post-racial healer to bed. Obama, like any other good leftist, thrives on promoting racial division. Specifically to your point about Obama being frustrated at the NAACP proclamation. If that were so, then why was his wife at the NAACP convention riling up the audience with made up tales of tea party racism? Seems to me if Obama were truly the racial healer you fantasize about, then he would have already come out with a statement opposing the proclamation. That's what real men of substance do when something like this happens. But Obama remains silent, thus giving his tacit approval.
hoppy| 7.15.10 @ 3:18PM
He did it by being prettier than Hillary.
Jeremiah| 7.15.10 @ 4:43PM
No kankles, either.
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 5:52PM
there is only genuine free speech for the wealthy;
but if it wasn't them on top of the fiood chain, it would be some others.
I just don't want another dreary, unpleasant, post-Reagan GOP interregnum.
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 6:05PM
If that's true why are you allowed to continue to spew your racist inanities?
Alan Brooks| 7.14.10 @ 5:55PM
pardon;
food chain, not "fiood" chain.
'Fiood' sounds Mideastern: "would you like some baclava for dessert after your fiood?"
Dixie Pixie| 7.14.10 @ 6:52PM
Why Yes I would like some. Please.
I always enjoy a tasty baklava after a good flood.
Alan, Do you know something about Obama future plans that you would like to share.
Missy| 7.14.10 @ 7:05PM
Doubt it; Alan has trouble figuring out what he's going to do from minute to minute.
Alan Brooks| 7.15.10 @ 4:41PM
You mean, like, say, fickle?..
sort of ... male PMS?
Becky| 7.15.10 @ 4:43PM
Sounds like you have a terminal case.
Erikj| 7.14.10 @ 11:31PM
If the Tea Party isnt racist then why did I see NeoNazi SKinheads at a local Tea Party last summer?
Missy| 7.15.10 @ 12:20AM
Must have been the same tea partiers who shouted non-existent epithets at Black congressmen in Washington, DC. Never any proof ever!
Or perhaps you saw the Skinheads when you attended your last KKK meeting--or maybe you were just looking in the mirror, moron.
kel| 7.15.10 @ 3:13AM
You will find actual, genuine communists and socialists at democratic gatherings, but only a fool would say they represent the entire party.
Maddox| 7.15.10 @ 11:27AM
I would say the Democrat Party represents them.
tonypal| 7.15.10 @ 9:32AM
You're a liar, you know it and we know it. But perhaps you can take up Andrew Breitbart on his offer of $100,000 to anyone offering evidence of racial eptithets or somthing similar being hurled at democrat members of Congress.
Incidentally, are all democrats communists and anarchists? Just wondering, because during all those anti-war protests a few years back, the crowds were littered with people carrying classic symbols of communism and anarchism. Following your twisted logic, it would seem to me that anyone who attended one of those rallies could be classified as subversive and anti-American. Any thoughts on that?
Bohemond| 7.15.10 @ 12:03PM
I think what you saw was off-duty US servicemen, who to you, I'm sure, are "NeoNazi SKinheads."
Nobama| 7.15.10 @ 2:26PM
Haha!
Ms. Jones| 7.15.10 @ 3:47PM
IF you did see "NeoNazi Skinheads", as you claim, they were probably infiltrators spurred on by Jason Levin's crashtheteaparty.com, et al. Progressives are scared to death of the Americans rising up in protest of government encroachment on every single area of our lives, and will stop at nothing to discredit us. The left has long engaged in the practice of "if we repeat a lie often enough, it becomes truth". Witness all the allegations of racism in the Tea Party movement. Every single news camera in the world was pointed at Nancy Pelosi as she walked across the bridge carrying her big, bad gavel, accompanied by congressional blacks, in a disgusting parody of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s march for civil rights. Allegations arose that the "n" word was shouted by Tea Partiers, and a $100,000 reward was posted for EVIDENCE that such slurs actually took place. Despite miles of news footage capturing the events surrounding the allegations, THE REWARD HAS GONE UNCLAIMED. Gee, I wonder why? Where are photographs of the supposed posters advocating the lynching of Barrack Obama and Eric Holder that the NAACP alleges? FOX News has aired video footage of New Black Panther head King Simir Shabazz inciting blacks to kill "Crackers" and "Cracker babies", and blocking the doors to a polling place while dressed in paramilitary garb, brandishing a night stick. Where is the proof of your allegations, Erikj? There isn't any! When you have to lie to discredit those who disagree with you, then you really don't have a leg to stand on, do you? The inability of progressive socialist/Marxists to meet on the field of ideas is because SOCIALISM HAS FAILED EVERYWHERE IT HAS BEEN APPLIED! It failed in Nazi Germany, it failed in Maoist China (but not before millions of Chinese perished), it failed in Stalinist Russia (where 50 million Russians died), it is failing in Castro's Cuba, and it is failing today all over Europe as the economies of Greece and Spain falter, and yet you people seem to believe that Obama can succeed where everyone else has failed. What colossal arrogance!
Yosemeti Sam| 7.14.10 @ 11:58PM
" NAACP Won't Release Text of Tea Party Resolution Until October ...."
Memo to AG Holder - um, what was that about race, conversation and cowardice?
Tim*| 7.15.10 @ 12:00AM
If The NAACP isn't racist then explain why , " As has been believably alleged, the NAACP attorney was lobbying or actively hinting to the new Obama appointees or their "friendlies" in the "career" ranks of DoJ that DoJ should drop the Black Panther case, it makes the NAACP's charges of racism against Tea Partiers even more tendentious. These New Black Panthers, after all, are some of the most virulently racist people around. Witness, again, this video of one of them advocating "killing crakkas" and "kill[ing] they [sic] babies."
Ayah| 7.15.10 @ 12:17AM
Don't forget, the "Crash the Tea Party" people didn't go anywhere, they just took their first website down. They once claimed to have 60 leaders across the country to infiltrate Tea Parties and behave as a racist Tea Partier. DENOUNCE ALL RACISM! And always reference this group
carnalzoo| 7.15.10 @ 1:02AM
The NAACP' has been around since 1909. They have lost their focus, the Advancement of Colored People, and have forgotten what real racism looks like. The NAACP has become irrelevant in the 21 century. The NAACP has made the same mistake the white community did; they labeled a group of people in a negative way because of a few bad people. The NAACP is no better than the white racists. They have become one.
martin j smith| 7.15.10 @ 7:39AM
Recently by pure chance ( not luck ) I fell into a "conversation" with a Left Democrat. What I discovered within 30 seconds or less is that this person was all bumper sticker and no substance. I beleive the trolls you read are the same.
Moving on: The NAACP resolution and its failure to put it out demonstrates the same idea. They all bumper sticker and nothing more.
To the issue of their resolution: Just as in Obama's behavior, the NAACP shows they are moral cowards by refusing to put up or shut up their resolution. This cowardice to me proves they have no evidence--just allegations--and anyone can do that. Second, this is political and nothing more. They got their orders from BHO and went right to it. Third, it demonstrates the Democrat Left fear of opposition and disagreement on substance.
I have no respect for the NAACP, absolutely no confidence in BHO and the rest of the Democrat Left leadershi- and as for the trolls. they are ROBOTS.
tonypal| 7.15.10 @ 9:34AM
Martin, any political movement that can be summarized on a 4" x 12" bumper sticker is not going to attract the brightest people.
hoppy| 7.15.10 @ 3:24PM
Damn right! Bumper stickers must be outlawed!
martin j smith| 7.15.10 @ 10:17AM
Tonypal: As for the general voting population that is absolutely right what you say.
However the real issue is political propaganda--that is what it is all about. I believe what is needed are two things:
(at least )
One: The Tea Party Movement --as much as possible must renounce this resolution as race baiting and because Michelle Obama gave a speech the day before suggest that this was a purposeful political act via BHO himself. There are no coincidences.
Second: The Republican Party Must repudiate this resolution in strong terms because it is false,it is political propaganda and this is the same kind opf narrative that has been applied to them. Intertestingly Karl Rove wrote a piece admitting he erred in not speaking against the Democrat Party's criticism of Bush on the war.
Well, this election IS WAR/ and republicans better be in battle gear to change the narrative. That is the essence of this fight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Third: The blogosphere needs to be all over the contrast between BHO's failure in the Justice Department over Racism in the Black Panthers as well as the utter irresponsibility of this resolution among other things.
Maddox| 7.15.10 @ 11:28AM
Resolutions decrying racism coming from racists groups are irrelevant.
Fresno DUI Attorney | 7.15.10 @ 11:31AM
Well written, fanned and faved. a great piece of writing
Oldefarte| 7.15.10 @ 11:58AM
The NAACP should seriously consider its previous advertised message that......A MIND IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE!!!!!!!!!!!!
martin j smith| 7.15.10 @ 1:26PM
Rush L just mentioned that Mr Jealous of the NAACP is somewhat backpedaling on the notion that the resolution states the Tea party is racist. I have not seen this in other soucres yet. But if true,
perhaps someone is doing what I was talking about above. Not because I said it--No, but because it is the right thing to do. And, politically
it is necessary.
Erikj| 7.15.10 @ 1:36PM
If the Tea Party isnt racist, then why did I see NeoNazi Skinheads at a local Tea Party last August? They were standing with the Tea Partiers holding signs on one side of the street and we were standing on the other. Both sides stood there for a couple hours shouting at each other.
Nobama| 7.15.10 @ 2:33PM
Exactly! The Skinheads are infiltrators trying to sully the Tea Party's good name! You Leftist clowns probably sent them (like that outed jackass teacher in Washington).
I'm sure you must have photos of the Skinheads--of course, right? You must because you said they were standing across the street from you for TWO HOURS!!
Provide a link to your photos to prove your accusations or shut the hell up, moron.
martin j smith| 7.15.10 @ 3:14PM
Erikj troll. and Erikj even Mr jealous is backpedling --oh somewhere out there the win loss factor has been calculated and guess what ? Its a loss for Dems so erikj--people are sniffing out the BS and telling the senders to go stuff it and rightly so.
SoCon| 7.15.10 @ 3:21PM
NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER GIVE UP!
TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY!!
MerMer| 7.15.10 @ 3:33PM
Do not forget that the TEA party is about waking people up to get them moving back to the freedoms God gave us that our government is supposed to protect. It is not a political party but a movement comprised of white, black, brown, yellow and red people who want security in the freedom to be ANYONE in the U.S.A.
If there was a skinhead there, he/she has the right.
~If we have to fight and die for our rights again, I would appreciate good fighters beside me~
Wally| 7.15.10 @ 4:45PM
Nazis are NOT welcome in the Tea Party and you know it.
MerMer| 7.15.10 @ 5:59PM
You say 'in the Tea Party' as if we have split into 3 parties.
You do not have to attend Rally's to be a part of the movement or the thought processes it is intended to generate. If the movement were to stop today, it's ideals will carry on.
~If we have to fight and die for our rights again, I would appreciate good fighters beside me~
Wally| 7.15.10 @ 9:10PM
3 Parties? There is only ONE Tea Party and Nazis are not welcome. No racists, thank you--black or white.
NO RACISTS, KLANNERS, SKINHEADS OR NAZIS are welcome. YOU ARE LOSERS.
UNDERSTAND?
Ms. Jones| 7.15.10 @ 3:56PM
I would suggest that anyone carrying overtly racist signage at a Tea Party event should be approached and engaged in conversation. Does s/he know what the 'TEA" in Tea party stands for? If not, this is an infiltrator and should be exposed as such. Like cockroaches, these cowards will scatter when the light of truth exposes them. If the person is a bona fide Tea Partier, gently remind him/her that we oppose Obama's Marxist policies and Chicago strong-arm tactics, not his race. Of course, Jenine Garafalo, an apparent mind reader, has stated that all opposition to Obama is racism.
Alan Brooks| 7.15.10 @ 4:34PM
Sure, the following stats indicate blacks are at the bottom-- why do you think Italian-Americans rebelled so violently way back when? And Italians are no fools-- they know that Fools Die.
"Alan Brooks,
Look at what I found for you:
Various single-offender crime statistics in US in 2007:
Number of white-on-black rapes/sexual assaults: 0
Number of black-on-white rapes/sexual assaults: 14,093
Number of white-on-black robberies: 0
Number of black-on-white robberies: 69,293
Number of white-on-black violent crimes (with completed violence): 2,572
Number of black-on-white violent crimes (with completed violence): 122,767
Number of white-on-black violent crimes, total: 55,685
Number of black-on-white violent crimes, total: 433,934
Source: Table 42 from US Dept. of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2007 Statistical Tables."
Alan Brooks| 7.15.10 @ 4:37PM
" we oppose Obama's Marxist policies and Chicago strong-arm tactics"
The South is worse. I KNOW what the South is like.
Wally| 7.15.10 @ 4:49PM
You epitomize the racist Democrat South of yesterday not the tolerant Conservative South of today!
Erikj| 7.15.10 @ 11:54PM
The Tea Party is made up of mostly hard right-wingers, and I've spent hundreds of hours on political message boards with these fools who make blatant racist comments all day. Denying that the Tea Party is racist is silly and juvenile. Why is the Stormfront a "Tea Party" member.
Wally| 7.16.10 @ 3:19AM
Where are those photos, liar? Until you produce proof of your outrageous lies and accusations your comments are as worthless as you are.
Erikj| 7.16.10 @ 11:42PM
Why did Tea Partyers have signs of Obama as a Witch Doctor with a bone through his nose. Why did so many Tea Partyers carry around stuffed monkeys? Stop the name calling. Its just as juvenile as your denial of the obvious.
Mike| 7.16.10 @ 5:34PM
Go Tea Party Go! Divide the conservative electorate like Nader did with the Dem's! You guys make my day!
Trivia question: Can you name three points of ideological "common ground" that exist between the Tea Party and the Modern Skinhead Party?
Why are you guys fighting? Can't all fascists just get along in this world?
REMEMBER NOVEMBER!| 7.16.10 @ 6:25PM
Probably not; you fascist liberals are always fighting like cats and dogs.
NAACP | 7.17.10 @ 7:15PM
It stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Communist People. Why do you think they like Obama?