The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Today, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to launch a new PAC called Freedom First. Its objective, according to a statement, is to "help elect conservatives in 2009 and 2010." But given reports that he is starting to put together a presidential campaign team, Pawlenty faced questions in a new media conference call this morning -- the very first question, I believe, from Politics Daily's Matt Lewis -- about whether this was really about 2012.

Pawlenty maintained that he has not decided whether he is going to seek the Republican presidential nomination, that his PAC legally and structurally is not about his own political ambitions, and that this will soon become clear when people see the results of its work on behalf of conservative candidates throughout the country over the next election cycle.

In his introductory remarks, Pawlenty spent a lot of time explaining why he picked "Freedom First" as the name of his PAC. He emphasized the importance of freedom and liberty as foundational principles for the country and party, talked about his record controlling spending in a liberal state, and pointed out that he accomplished the first cuts in real terms over a two-year budget cycle. Pawlenty noted the rhetorical disadvantage conservatives are at competing against candidates who promise to give out "free stuff." Pawlenty said that people in distress are likely to grab at the first floating object they find to keep their heads above water. It's up to conservatives to explain that the free stuff doesn't really come free.

This is noteworthy because Pawlenty -- coiner of the term "party of Sam's Club" -- has been a candidate some big-government conservatives hoped would run on their vision. But Pawlenty's strong emphasis on fiscal conservatism and issues like school choice seems to run counter to that. In fact, he talked enough about liberty, freedom, and the Founders that at times he almost sounded like Ron Paul-enty.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Sarah| 10.1.09 @ 3:28PM

What we need are ideas, ideas, ideas, not 35 people running for office. We need to elect folks who might have a chance of actually serving, not taking. That comes from ideas. The Republicans have been accused of not having any. Let's get with it. We cannot not tolerate any more government fraud, lies, half truths, I'll vote for you if you vote for me garbage anymore. We need to elevate the quality of candidates running for office.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/01/tim-pawlenty-launches-politica

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT