The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Blue Dogs React to House Democratic Health Care Bill

Rep. Mike Ross, has released a statement on behalf of Blue Dog Democrats reacting to the House Democrat's health care bill, which I'd categorize as neither supportive nor dead set against -- in fact, it doesn't really address the bill specifically. The moderate Blue Dogs hold the key to whether the legislation will pass -- liberal Democrats will get behind this bill, and it's so extreme that few, if any, Republicans will vote for it.

Here's Ross:

"The skyrocketing cost of health care is not only bankrupting American families and businesses;
it is leading this country down a path to fiscal disaster. We can never balance the federal budget
again without reforming the system to hold the growth of health care costs to the rate of inflation.

"The Blue Dogs are committed to passing health care reform. However, reform that does not meet
the President's goals of substantially bringing down costs is not an option.

"Over the past several months, Blue Dogs have put forth substantive policy proposals aimed at
achieving this objective, and we look forward to working through the legislative process to
incorporate these cost cutting measures."

Last week, 40 Blue Dogs signed a letter coming out against a strong government-run plan, which the House bill includes, so make what you will of Ross's decision not to mention it.

Comments

hmm_contrib| 7.14.09 @ 7:14PM

The Blue Dogs didn't "com[e] out against it." They said they wouldn't support a public option unless certain changes were made and certain requirements met. Big difference. Their letter contained this sentence: ""We also wish to reiterate our support for the recommendations previously made by our Coalition regarding how to appropriately structure a public option" which, again, is precisely not "coming out against a public option.

Philip Klein| 7.14.09 @ 8:35PM

That's why I specified "STRONG government-run plan."

Pingback| 7.15.09 @ 12:06AM

CBO’s ‘Partial’ Analysis of House Health Care Bill: Over $1 Trillion | America Watche links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Dogs have put forth substantive policy proposals aimed at achieving this objective, and we look forward to working through the legislative process to incorporate these cost cutting measures.” As Phil Klein notes, 40 Blue Dogs came out against a government-run option in health care reform last week, but this letter conspicuously does not mention the government-run portion of this plan. And, speaking of the…

hmm_contrib| 7.15.09 @ 3:15PM

That's why I specified "STRONG government-run plan."
You're contending they want to/will support a weak one? Really?

WARREN SHEETS| 7.18.09 @ 11:06PM

Would you expect non-smokers to pay the tobacco tax?
Would you expect Renters to pay Property Taxes?
NO.
Then why should Obama and his Team expect successful Americans, most of whom would never expect to use his Health Plan anyway, to pay for their Health Insurance Plan???

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Reid Disses David Broder

Philip Klein

* * * *

What to Expect in the Senate Today

Philip Klein

* * * *

The Threat to Medical Innovation

Philip Klein

* * * *

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Justice Dep't Recusal List!

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT