The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

The Specter that Haunts Conservatives

With Pat Toomey apparently putting a 2010 Senate race back on the table, conservatives are once again faced with that age-old question: What to do about Arlen Specter? I'm planning on doing a piece looking at the impact conservative primary challenges have had, for both good and ill, on the GOP (though it's no secret that I've personally supported many such challenges in the past). But I don't think what should be done about Specter at this point is an easy call. All candidate preferences that follow in this post are strictly my personal opinion and don't reflect anyone else's at this magazine.

In 2004, the case for primarying Specter seemed pretty solid. Republicans had a Senate majority they seemed likely to expand with at least several Southern pickups. Ultimately, they came out of that election with a 55-45 advantage. Toomey was well to Specter's right and as a congressman who had won in a Democratic-leaning district was not a sure general election loser, even if he would have had a tougher time holding the seat than Specter.

Under those political conditions, it was probably worth rolling the dice. And I think a similarly decent case could be made that Toomey's challenge -- and the equally unsuccessful subsequent conservative campaign against Specter as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman -- made Specter more cooperative with conservatives than he might otherwise have been.

Coming on six years later, the Republicans barely cling to enough Senate seats to threaten the occasional filibuster. Retirements in Florida, Ohio, Missouri, and even Kansas potentially give the Democrats additional pickup opportunities. Jim Bunning is looking shaky in Kentucky. Under these political conditions, it seems that keeping a Senate seat in the hands of even a lousy Republican is worthwhile.

Specter's lifetime American Conservative Union ratings are better than every Democrat in the Senate except Ben Nelson's. His 2007 ratings were better than every Senate Democrat except Mary Landrieu, whom he tied (she was up for reelection in 2008). Specter will frustrate conservatives, but he won't switch party affiliations like Jim Jeffords did and Lincoln Chafee might have done if reelected.

But then again: Specter's reelect numbers aren't very good. The coverage tends to focus on his unpopularity with Republicans, but a majority of state voters say they would prefer to see someone else in that seat. That may not mean anything -- a lot of Massachusetts voters told pollsters they wanted a senator other than John Kerry in 2008, before they went on to reelect him with his biggest margin ever -- but it does suggest Specter is not a lock to win reelection this time around.

Second, Specter's unreliability comes at a great cost on important issues. He was pivotal in the passage of the $787 billion ($1 trillion, with interest) stimulus package. He may play a similar role on card check. He gives the Obama administration's policies a veneer of bipartisan support. If he is going to be singlehandedly responsible for some of the GOP's biggest legislative defeats, is it really essential to have his vote on less important issues?

I don't know the answer yet. But it's definitely something worth thinking about. Especially for conservative Republicans in Pennsylvania.

UPDATE: A blogger at the Next Right weighs in against a Specter primary challenge.

UPDATE II: Matt Lewis has Toomey's statement.

Comments

Pingback| 3.2.09 @ 2:03PM

BIDEN ON SPECTER: ‘He knows what’s worth losing over and he’s willing to act on it…In links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

BIDEN ON SPECTER: ‘He knows what’s worth losing over and he’s willing to act on it…In his heart, I know he’s a Democrat’… | GrassrootsPA var fileTypes = ['Array']; /*…

james23| 3.2.09 @ 3:59PM

Don't overthink it, James. Most PA conservatives were ready to throw Specter out 6 years ago, but enough were persuaded by Bush-Rove as to Arlen's indispensability that he held on to defeat Toomey, though not by much.

Next year, Benedict Arlen will not have an incumbent President to tip the scales for him in the primary. He's toast.

btw, before you go to press that with article, rethink this one, or spell out your thinking a bit more:
" . . . . made Specter more cooperative with conservatives than he might otherwise have been." For example.........

W. James Antle III| 3.2.09 @ 5:16PM

I'll give you just one example: When Specter chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee between 2005 to 2007, he was helpful in confirming President Bush's conservative judges. He was particularly supportive of John Roberts and Sam Alito.

Before the conservative campaign to deny Specter the Judiciary Committee chairmanship -- a campaign I supported, by the way -- it was not clear that he'd be so helpful. In fact, he responded to the election results by hinting that the president shouldn't nominate anyone who didn't share his view that Roe v. Wade is "inviolate."

Teleprompter Messiah| 3.2.09 @ 5:23PM

Fiscal conservatism is big tent. We'll need budget hawks next year. They will be very popular.

Is Specter a necessary man to have around? Well, if your cornerstone policy position is putting the brakes to Democrats, the answer is no.

Pingback| 3.3.09 @ 8:08PM

Celebrities » Blog Archive » The American Spectator : Amspecblog : the Specter That H links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Under these political conditions, it seems that keeping a Senate seat in the hands of even a lousy Republican is worthwhile. Specter’s lifetime American Conservative Union ratings are better … Page 2 Other Interesting Articles The Conservative Agenda » Blog Archive » The Revenge of the Britons Live Blogging of Obama’s Joint Address « That’s Right Nate Tags: american conservative union, jim bunning…

Pingback| 3.4.09 @ 11:29AM

The Specter that Haunts Conservatives — But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

The Specter that Haunts Conservatives — But As For Me .addtoany_share_save

Pingback| 3.5.09 @ 10:06PM

A Specter Is Haunting America « 42FF links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…A Specter Is Haunting America Kudos to W. James Antle, III, online editor of the American Spectator, for the absolute best Sen. Arlen Specter (RINO-PA, 40%) title of the week-end: “ the Specter That Haunts Conservatives.” Alas, Antle got it slightly wrong; I have corrected it in the title to this post. Antle blew the obvious because he was unable (or afraid) to draw the obvious conclusion: When a…

挂电话| 8.25.09 @ 4:37AM

I want to buy a [url=http://www.replicahandbags963.com]Louis Vuitton replica handbags[/url] and [url=http://www.replicahandbags963.com]Replica Handbags[/url] that [url=http://www.replicahandbags963.com]Designer Handbags[/url]。[url=http://www.rolex-hot.com]Breitling Replica[/url] and [url=http://www.enjoy-watches.com]Replica Rolex[/url],[url=http://kobotechweb.com]note counter[/url].

NFL jerseys| 9.6.09 @ 11:39PM

It is a wonderful article,I like it!Welcome to read following news: NFL jerseys,Photoshop CS2,ghd Hair Straightener,NFL jersey,Adobe Photoshop CS4,cheap uggs.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

The Threat to Medical Innovation

Philip Klein

* * * *

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Justice Dep't Recusal List!

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Ben Nelson Shuffle

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT