President Obama gave a characteristically well-delivered speech,
and one that demonstrates why he has the potential to be a
transformational liberal leader. Sure, his contradictory goals
don't stand up to much scrutiny. He says we'll all have to give
up some of our priorities even while outlining the most expansive
domestic agenda in decades. He says he doesn't believe in
bigger government, but vows to pump more money into banks, bail
out homeowners, set up a fund to provide auto loans, and spend
billions more on education and energy. He creates the illusion of
being a sober and realistic leader who understands that we face
some hard choices and tradeoffs while he declares that the way to
reduce the growth of government spending on health care is to
have the government spend more money on health care. There's
simply no way that all of his policy claims add up. But they
don't have to. Not right now. President Obama remains popular and
is in office at a time of crisis. After eight years of Bush, the
American public is desperate and open to his arguments for a more
robust role for the federal government. Obama talks of the
day of reckoning. Well, at some point, he'll face his own day of
reckoning, when his rhetorical flourishes will be swatted down by
reality. But until that day comes, he'll get much of what he
wants. The big question is how much damage he can do before the
public catches on to him.
And, of course you are aware that George W. Bush was more popular
one month in (62% approval) than the esteemed Obama (59%)?
Obama's rhetoric will quickly face the daily grind of reality
(hint: monthly unemployment numbers) at which point he will face
an incredible fall off.
Cynicism replaces hopium and changium by summer 2009.
Joseph| 2.25.09 @ 1:00AM
Don't understimate the unfortunate propensity of vast segments of
the American public to be continued to be swayed by lofty and
well delivered oratory.
Interloper| 2.25.09 @ 1:44AM
Obama rules!
The tendency of the far Right to understate the President's
popularity is amusing. The lowest he ranks in any current poll is
63 percent favorable in Gallop's. Other polls have him as high as
68 percent favorable. The numbers are rising in post-speech
surveys.
Nor is what the President is saying hard to understand. For
example, by spending money to get most Americans basic health
care now, society will pay less money for health care for
advanced health problems in the future. Just preventing, say,
thousands of new diabetes cases, will save millions of dollars
down the road.
Pecos Pete| 2.25.09 @ 7:33AM
What if all of the billions spent on medical research don't
discover a cure for cancer or diabetes? What if all of the
billions spent on green energy don't solve energy availability or
the bogus earth warming ... how do you solve something that is
bogus? Okay, I know ... we'll hope ... and then we'll get change.
ame| 2.25.09 @ 9:31AM
Finally, with Jindal we have a leader on the national stage, not
an empty styrofoam Greek column Obama poser.
Bobby Jindal is one of a very few truly brilliant people who have
ideas that work and have proven to do so. He has more smarts in
his socks than Obama has in his pretend sentimental idiotic
"dreams."
Jindal is a man of principle, not politics; a man with an ethical
and moral center, not "above my pay grade" - "I screwed up" - "I
won" pureile whining; a leader, not a facilitator; a person of
action, not staging; someone who believes in the power of America
and Americans, not the power of government; a man of purpose, not
empty promise.
Bobby Jindal has actually served the America he leads, not just
taken from it for personal gain.
Jindal and other young Republicans such as Cantor and Ryan
finally give me some real hope.
Obama couldn't lead a dog to a fire hydrant, but he can put dogs
in a "study group" and teach them to bark.
Jindal is real, a leader who has proven himself through his
actions, someone we can actually trust and someone who delivers,
not the solipsistic pathetic frat brat elitist race baiting
welfare Chicago thug wind blower we now must endure. I didn't
listen to Obambi's speech because he never says ANYTHING - NO
SUBSTANCE, just dissembling equivocation, but I did listen to
Jindal because he not only speaks with substance, he delivers it.
hardball| 2.25.09 @ 11:46AM
I'm so fed up with "what the majority" feels, or thinks, or
wants. Because it's a "majority" does not make the idea or
actions sound, moral, Constitutional, or just plain right (there
is a "right" and "wrong"). In spite of this, the media continues
to promote "majority" ideas as productive. Two wolves and a sheep
is a majority. And right now we have rabid wolves in power.
Duane Hinde| 2.25.09 @ 11:54AM
As the American Indian said about the white man, "He speaks with
a forked tongue." So does mr. obama!!!! I listen to his speech
last night and there was nothing new. He is STILL out there
talking like he did when he was running for the job at the White
House. Nothing New, just a lot of B.S.
…his contradictory goals don’t stand up to much scrutiny. He says we’ll all have to give up some of our priorities even while outlining the most expansive domestic agenda in decades. They believe he will fail eventually SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "? of The Day: If You Saw Last Night’s Speech, Do You Feel More Secure W/ Respect to The Economy?", url: "http://highbridnation.com/2009/02/25/of-the-day-if-you-saw…
It definitely was a well delivered speech. I wonder how long
Chairwoman Pelosi took to write it for her Puppet President?
“For bipartisanship to work, Speaker Pelosi needs to reconsider
the closed process she’s used and give members of both parties,
the press, and the public a reasonable opportunity to participate
in the process. It was irresponsible when Republican leaders
rushed certain bills to the floor as the majority party, and it’s
still irresponsible when Democrats do it today. Americans have
rightly rejected the old ways of Washington, D.C., and have made
clear their desire to have us work together to solve the
country’s problems.” was a press release provided by the office
of Congressman Greg Walden before President Obama's speech of
February 24, 2009.
Oregon's lone Republican in Congress, Greg Walden's aide said
he's been suffering from a bad sore throat, but that Walden did
watch the address.
Greg Walden said, however, "You know I never found you could
borrow your way into prosperity."
I can understand how Representative Greg Walden has had a hard
time swollowing this speech when you know it is just another
Ponzi scheme that is called ARRA or the Stimulus Plan. Maybe I am
suffering from a bad cold as well.
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays
returns to investors from their own money or money paid by
subsequent investors rather than from profit. In this case, we
are selling as yet unborn children into slavery to finance this.
We will start paying this, of course, in another way. When the
government borrows and spends while handing out tax cuts, they
have to print money. The more money they print, the less a dollar
is worth. That translates into inflation.
So, this bill will stimulate the budget deficit and inflation.
The handy out in claiming 3.5 million jobs will be created or
"saved," is that you cannot track what jobs might be "saved" by
ARRA. Even if we lose 3.5 million more jobs, Pelosi's Puppet, the
President, can still claim it would be 7 million without it. This
is dishonest as a claim.
Sebastian B. O. Buniontow VI| 2.25.09 @ 12:51AM
And, of course you are aware that George W. Bush was more popular one month in (62% approval) than the esteemed Obama (59%)?
Obama's rhetoric will quickly face the daily grind of reality (hint: monthly unemployment numbers) at which point he will face an incredible fall off.
Cynicism replaces hopium and changium by summer 2009.
Joseph| 2.25.09 @ 1:00AM
Don't understimate the unfortunate propensity of vast segments of the American public to be continued to be swayed by lofty and well delivered oratory.
Interloper| 2.25.09 @ 1:44AM
Obama rules!
The tendency of the far Right to understate the President's popularity is amusing. The lowest he ranks in any current poll is 63 percent favorable in Gallop's. Other polls have him as high as 68 percent favorable. The numbers are rising in post-speech surveys.
Nor is what the President is saying hard to understand. For example, by spending money to get most Americans basic health care now, society will pay less money for health care for advanced health problems in the future. Just preventing, say, thousands of new diabetes cases, will save millions of dollars down the road.
Pecos Pete| 2.25.09 @ 7:33AM
What if all of the billions spent on medical research don't discover a cure for cancer or diabetes? What if all of the billions spent on green energy don't solve energy availability or the bogus earth warming ... how do you solve something that is bogus? Okay, I know ... we'll hope ... and then we'll get change.
ame| 2.25.09 @ 9:31AM
Finally, with Jindal we have a leader on the national stage, not an empty styrofoam Greek column Obama poser.
Bobby Jindal is one of a very few truly brilliant people who have ideas that work and have proven to do so. He has more smarts in his socks than Obama has in his pretend sentimental idiotic "dreams."
Jindal is a man of principle, not politics; a man with an ethical and moral center, not "above my pay grade" - "I screwed up" - "I won" pureile whining; a leader, not a facilitator; a person of action, not staging; someone who believes in the power of America and Americans, not the power of government; a man of purpose, not empty promise.
Bobby Jindal has actually served the America he leads, not just taken from it for personal gain.
Jindal and other young Republicans such as Cantor and Ryan finally give me some real hope.
Obama couldn't lead a dog to a fire hydrant, but he can put dogs in a "study group" and teach them to bark.
Jindal is real, a leader who has proven himself through his actions, someone we can actually trust and someone who delivers, not the solipsistic pathetic frat brat elitist race baiting welfare Chicago thug wind blower we now must endure. I didn't listen to Obambi's speech because he never says ANYTHING - NO SUBSTANCE, just dissembling equivocation, but I did listen to Jindal because he not only speaks with substance, he delivers it.
hardball| 2.25.09 @ 11:46AM
I'm so fed up with "what the majority" feels, or thinks, or wants. Because it's a "majority" does not make the idea or actions sound, moral, Constitutional, or just plain right (there is a "right" and "wrong"). In spite of this, the media continues to promote "majority" ideas as productive. Two wolves and a sheep is a majority. And right now we have rabid wolves in power.
Duane Hinde| 2.25.09 @ 11:54AM
As the American Indian said about the white man, "He speaks with a forked tongue." So does mr. obama!!!! I listen to his speech last night and there was nothing new. He is STILL out there talking like he did when he was running for the job at the White House. Nothing New, just a lot of B.S.
Pingback| 2.25.09 @ 12:47PM
» ? of The Day: If You Saw Last Night’s Speech, Do You Feel More Secure W/ Respect t links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
John lloyd Scharf| 2.25.09 @ 1:22PM
It definitely was a well delivered speech. I wonder how long Chairwoman Pelosi took to write it for her Puppet President?
“For bipartisanship to work, Speaker Pelosi needs to reconsider the closed process she’s used and give members of both parties, the press, and the public a reasonable opportunity to participate in the process. It was irresponsible when Republican leaders rushed certain bills to the floor as the majority party, and it’s still irresponsible when Democrats do it today. Americans have rightly rejected the old ways of Washington, D.C., and have made clear their desire to have us work together to solve the country’s problems.” was a press release provided by the office of Congressman Greg Walden before President Obama's speech of February 24, 2009.
Oregon's lone Republican in Congress, Greg Walden's aide said he's been suffering from a bad sore throat, but that Walden did watch the address.
Greg Walden said, however, "You know I never found you could borrow your way into prosperity."
I can understand how Representative Greg Walden has had a hard time swollowing this speech when you know it is just another Ponzi scheme that is called ARRA or the Stimulus Plan. Maybe I am suffering from a bad cold as well.
A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to investors from their own money or money paid by subsequent investors rather than from profit. In this case, we are selling as yet unborn children into slavery to finance this.
We will start paying this, of course, in another way. When the government borrows and spends while handing out tax cuts, they have to print money. The more money they print, the less a dollar is worth. That translates into inflation.
So, this bill will stimulate the budget deficit and inflation.
The handy out in claiming 3.5 million jobs will be created or "saved," is that you cannot track what jobs might be "saved" by ARRA. Even if we lose 3.5 million more jobs, Pelosi's Puppet, the President, can still claim it would be 7 million without it. This is dishonest as a claim.
http://theprogressivecapitalist.blogspot.com/