The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

At Large

When It Rains, It Pours

Vietnam’s economy is more confused that its weather — and too weak to emulate China.

Until the beginning of July it had been exceptionally hot and dry in north-central Vietnam. In the south’s usual sub-tropic environment the temperatures hovered at the expected humid 90 degrees, with perhaps a bit less than the usual afternoon rainfall. Then came the monsoons and floods. Confused weather is hardly this nation’s only problem. Just look its confused economy, where nothing runs smoothly or can pass for normal.

There’s a party congress coming up in six months and a great deal of hard work to be done beforehand. Before its regular congress, the Vietnamese Communist Party usually does everything it can to “cook the books” in an effort to show progress. Who says Hanoi doesn’t breed some clever capitalists?

The problem is that GDP targets can be manipulated rather easily if a state-controlled economic system allows inflation to rise commensurate with those targets. Such trickery does not go unnoticed, and the nation’s borrowing ability is on the edge of being submerged well below the negative investment grade at which it is already pegged.

Hillary Clinton, who arrived in Hanoi yesterday for a much anticipated two-day visit, had better have stuffed her diplomatic bags with U.S. dollars, preferably in high denominations. That’s the currency everyone wants these days in Vietnam. Whether it’s the little shop on what ex-GIs remember as Tu Do street — now known as Dong Khoi — or the State Bank of Vietnam, the Yankee dollar is once again highly sought after.

The Viet Kieu, those 4 million Vietnamese living abroad, usually send back about $2.5 billion each year. Official figures state that 500,000 Viet Kieu return to visit each year, bringing their hard currency with them. But the weak world economy has hit tourism and financial repatriation hard this past year.

Of course gold is always good to have around, as any merchant in Ho Chi Minh City will affirm. But it’s not as easily convertible or transportable as the greenback. The economic liberation program known as Doi Moi has succeeded in the last two decades in reintroducing Vietnam to the world of international trade and finance, but in doing so has also made it vulnerable to this same global free market.

As is often repeated, however, from one end of Vietnam to the other — and, yes, Vietnam still has two very distinct north and south cultures — according to official sources, the country’s gross domestic product calculation rose over five percent while the rest of the world financial system was tanking. Interestingly, none of these bureaucrats ever allow themselves to be identified by name.

Vietnam is actually attempting to accomplish two goals at once. In the first instance the political echelon wants to hold on to its old socialist system of central government control. At the same time it wants the benefit of gaining investment, foreign and domestic, as a result of accepting a market-based commerce. It’s the Vietnamese perception of how the Chinese success has been created. Unfortunately for Hanoi’s communist capitalists, the Chinese model is not that easy to transfer.

China accumulated hard currency by being able to create well-made basic goods competitive with those produced in the U.S. and Europe. Vietnam can do the same, even in competition with other developing nations, but not until what it exports to the West far outstrips what it needs to import from the West. The dollar imbalance creates continuing pressure on the Vietnamese dong that in turn edges inflation forward.

While some government economists support the idea that a depressed Vietnamese currency actually aids exports paid for in dollars, the result is an internal economy that cannot immediately participate in the benefit of the overall export product increase. Interest rates have been raised to battle inflation and that has diluted the rate of investment.

The typical Vietnamese businessman reacts, not unjustifiably, with considerable pessimism at the government’s ability to manage the broader aspects of the nation’s economy. In reaction, converting to and hoarding U.S. dollars is his only protection. The government has had to take drastic action.

With a trade deficit that reached $6.7 billion in the first six months of 2010, the Ministry of Finance is tightening controls over imports of not only consumer goods but also basic commodities. The State Bank of Vietnam has instructed commercial banks to restrict lending in foreign currencies that fund the import of a broad list of products, which includes everything from mobile phones and salt to steel and fertilizer.

On second thought, maybe the climate is easier to figure out than Vietnam’s economics.

About the Author

George H. Wittman writes a weekly column on international affairs for The American Spectator online. He was the founding chairman of the National Institute for Public Policy.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (6) |

Clinton nee Publius | 7.23.10 @ 11:35AM

Socialism is the economic equivalent of Linus Van Pelt's vigil for The Great Pumpkin. Instead of realizing that socialism is not inherently self-sustaining (and therefore must be abandoned as being unsuitable for organizing markets and paying the costs of fiscal outlays), the Vietnamese are waiting for the appearance of the fabled "right leader" who can finally make socialism work as advertised. Like The Great Pumpkin, the right leader is just a fable - an excuse to keep the increasingly restive masses in line and in expectation that things will get better. In the meantime, socialism always requires scapegoats to blame for the inevitable failures that MUST occur as a result of denying the reality that Rational Choice Theory and the Laws of Mathematics apply to all economies - even corrupt socialist ones.

Vietnam fought a civil war to bring true world socialism to Vietnam and the recalcitrant South Vietnamese were the original scapegoats. Then reality set in after the war ended and the great era of communist prosperity didn't occur - only a complete economic depression. The next scapegoat was Cambodia and the thugs of the Khmer Rouge, but after destroying Pol Pot the economic panacea that only world socialism could create didn't occur either.

In 1986 they decided to try a little bit of capitalism, but still have corrupt state control of the economy and wealth. They got a little bit of a turnaround and lots of lip service from the world press who are still eager to see the world's first example of pure socialism work (like Linus Van Pelt's quest for The Great Pumpkin, the corrupt liberal-progressive media continues the vigil in hopes of seeing world socialism finally succeed).

All of this begs the central question of practicality of economic policy that always escapes the liberal-progressive mind. If the system can only be made to work once every hundred years by virtue of the advent of the socialist messiah, what kind of system is it? It is not a system, so this means that liberal-progressives are truly ignorant of the facts (not likely) or that liberal-progressivism isn't really about creating a sustainable economic organizational and management system for capital, labor and wealth, but a criminal conspiracy organized for the benefit of the liberal-progressive insider group by which they profit at the exclusive cost and risk of everyone else. The fact that over 100 million people have been murdered in the last 100 years by liberal-progressives who claimed they were seeking "true world socialism in our time" or "true communism" or true whatever, suggests that it must be a criminal enterprise. What else would explain over 100 million deaths and the destruction that is always created in the wake of these political and economic "systems"?

Quartermaster| 7.23.10 @ 7:16PM

The Great Pumpkin analogy is very good!

dw| 7.23.10 @ 4:32PM

No... another failed socialist economy to be ignored by the leftist idealist and the POTUS. How can that be? No one predicted that. Hummmm...

Yosemeti Sam| 7.24.10 @ 1:38AM

Vietnam?

A black wall in DC cites 50,000 some US-named soldiers who died in that shit-hole (pardon the shorthand) nation.

Do ya know that shit-hole nation makes meditative tea candles?

LOL.

Only two meatheads - McGoo and that RI moored yachtsman, who BTW served in Vietnam - would
lend their putative esteem to PC-reconcile with that shit-hole nation. Pluvial exhibition indeed!

John II| 7.25.10 @ 9:08PM

Interesting that the usual Purpleguy-type trollsters never comment on articles of this sort.

Quick cut to Dr. Strangelove sitting in his wheelchair in the shadows and just . . . coldly observing.

More Articles by George H. Wittman

More Articles From At Large

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/23/when-it-rains-it-pours

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT