The Right Prescription
Breast Cancer Follies
Obamacare rationing is now in business — and not only on mammograms but also on screening for heart disease in women.
Think Congress is regretting having allocated over a billion dollars to let the government generate studies to tell us what medical tests and procedures should be covered under Obamacare?
In the wake of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation to tell women in their forties to take a hike on mammograms, and to suggest that other screening technologies aren’t worth the money, I bet it won’t be long before that budget and the agency that has it and also controls the information the Task Force uses to make such wise decisions, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, are the subjects of congressional hearings.
The breast cancer recommendations come in a 30-page review of 10 studies that even the authors admit cannot be generalized to individual forms of breast cancer and different groups of patients .
But there’s more. The Task Force on Monday also issued a second recommendation that has received no media coverage — on screening for heart disease. Because heart disease kills more women than breast cancer, that decision could be even more dangerous for women because it is based on — or biased towards — old, even outdated methods for determining risk for a serious illness.
The Task Force rejected the use of a test for heart inflammation called C-reactive protein (CRP) as a reliable predictor of risk of heart disease. Instead, it said doctors should stick to a rule of thumb called the Framingham Risk Evaluation (FRE).
The FRE uses the number of fatal and nonfatal heart attacks suffered by workers in Framingham, Massachusetts, within a ten-year period, and it is based on a summary estimate of major risk factors for coronary heart disease, such as age, blood pressure, blood cholesterol levels and smoking.
How did the Task Force conclude CRP testing is worthless? The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality told them so based on “the evidence.”
But AHRQ ignored three recent studies demonstrating the importance of CRP. A 2005 study from Johns Hopkins and funded by the National Institutes of Health found that the FRE fails to identify approximately one-third of women likely to develop coronary heart disease. Many women deemed “low risk” by the geniuses at AHRQ had had coronary atherosclerosis, which even the Task Force will admit predicts heart attacks.
Second, it ignored the JUPITER (“Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin”) study. That experiment tested whether giving healthy people with low LDL cholesterol levels but high hs-CRP levels would reduce death from heart attacks. It did. Or more to the point, it showed that screening CRP along with cholesterol tests can cut the incidence of heart disease by 40 percent in high risk individuals with statins and reduce death from heart disease by 20 percent.
Third, the Task Force, in a rush to save a buck for Obamacare, skated past the most recent findings from JUPITER that apply particularly to women. Forty percent of JUPITER’s participants were women 60 and over with low cholesterol and no history of heart disease but were tested and found to have high levels of inflammation. It turns out that women are more likely to benefit from testing and treatment than men: the incidence of heart disease of any form was cut by 46 percent in women over 60 compared to 42 percent in men over 50.
But that’s not the Task Force recommendation. Instead, the Task Force, relying on a review of studies and research that ignored these important findings and stopped looking in 2002, just when the understanding of CRP as a predictor was in its infancy, came to a pre-ordained conclusion that conveniently fits the party line that so-called evidence-based medicine can actually reduce the cost of care even as government creates a new health care entitlement.
The one-size fits all recommendation for breast cancer screening ignored the fact that breast cancer is not just one disease, but many related illnesses with different pathways and signatures. Worse, it acknowledged the wide variation that makes individualized risk assessment essential but went on to claim it wasn’t worth the effort. And it failed to estimate the impact of telling women to simply go away. It took years to build up screening rates to where new drugs could have an impact on mortality. Now all that could be undone.
Similarly, the failure to take into account advances in testing and treatment, insights that will save the lives of thousands of women, is hard to explain, let alone justify. Dr. Diane Petitti, vice chair of the Task Force, maintains: “we have to say what we see based on the science and the data.”
But if you only see what you are shown, then what you see or say isn’t really science. It’s politics. And if you think these two decisions were controversial, just wait. With billions to spend and a high profile, the AHRQ and its Preventive Services Task Force will turn prevention into just another word for saying “no” to medical innovation.
About the Author
Robert M. Goldberg is vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest and founder of Hands Off My H ealth, a grass roots health care empowerment network. His is new book, Tabloid Medicine: How the Internet is Being Used To Hijack Medical Science For Fear and Profit, was published last month by Kaplan.
Letter to the Editor View all comments (40) | Leave a comment
Related Articles
More Articles by Robert M. Goldberg
More Articles From The Right Prescription
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/18/breast-cancer-follies
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- Downton’s Class System — and Ours
- What’s in a Name?
- Ailes: A Voice for the Silent Majority
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Pingback| 11.18.09 @ 6:21AM
The American Spectator : Breast Cancer Follies | cholesteroltests links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Appleby| 11.18.09 @ 6:36AM
let not your heart be troubled -- soon enough Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will denounce this as a Black Holocaust/Genocide aimed at the Black Community, and the groveling will of epic proportions.
And just wait until they start telling Black men not to have prostate examinations ...
Melvin| 11.18.09 @ 7:52AM
Shhhh, that is supposed to be a secret.
Walter| 11.18.09 @ 9:12AM
What about AIDS or sickle cell anemia? Will the recommendation be "Well, you're going to die anyway, so why test for it?" That's going to go over really well.
netstumbler| 11.18.09 @ 7:06PM
I have learned that everything the *ahem* pres has said is actually the opposite. If he says he's "concerned about our soldiers in Afghanistan" it really translates into "I don't care about the your soldiers in Afghanistan" If he says "the health care reform will cover AIDS victims and cover the testing for sickle cell anemia" it translates into "No way will my government cover AIDS victims (they must have done that by their life style or bad choices) or the cost of any testing for sickle cell anemia" It's coming faster then we know.
Pingback| 11.18.09 @ 7:48AM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : Breast Cancer Follies [spectator.org links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Melvin| 11.18.09 @ 7:54AM
I supposed this is going to be allot like be able to collect Social Security by sending your death certificate to the SS Administration.
Ken (Old Texican)| 11.18.09 @ 9:58AM
Well
"Dumbunny" Sarah Palin nailed it didn't she?
...DEATH PANELS!
Tim| 11.18.09 @ 10:18AM
Gubmint Kare!
"Our studies show that most tests are unnecessary for all but high risk groups, such as Congressman and wealthy donors to congressmen."
Radiologist| 11.18.09 @ 11:13AM
The task force members are career bureaucrats. Notice not one of them is a radiologist (who are responsible for diagnosing breast cancer via mammograms), oncologist, or breast surgeon. These 'experts' are epidemiologists or primary care types who do not diagnose or treat breast cancer.
By all means, don't ask the experts. Ignore the American College of Radiology and the American Cancer Society. Let some bureaucrats read selected studies that support their foregone conclusions and then dictate the rules for the peasants.
This is only the beginning of the unraveling of the finest medical system in the world.
Doc Holiday| 11.18.09 @ 12:50PM
What about the government's recent mandate to fortify foods with folic acid? Studies are now showing an increase in cancer to the folic acid fortification. Just another example.
tj| 11.18.09 @ 1:31PM
Radiologist:This is only the beginning of the unraveling of the finest medical system in the world.
REPEAT AFTER ME: "WE ARE NOT GOING TO LET THIS HAPPEN!!
WRTolkas| 11.18.09 @ 2:04PM
Bravo, or Brava tj.
I'm doing my part. My senators, Levin and Stabenow, are getting tired of my mail.
"Change you can believe in." Not on my side of the river - never!
Why isn't the RNC or the Republican's in the senate taking this issue and running with it?
Regards
WRTolkas
JP| 11.18.09 @ 2:31PM
Call it death panels by other means.
baldwin| 11.18.09 @ 6:00PM
Aren't these the same people who forced 'big evil insurance companies' to pay for these tests through mandates years ago? Will they now refund the money for these 'unnecessary' tests? You see when the insurance companies are paying the gov't mandates tests like these. When the gov't is about to pay they tell you that you don't need them.
Kara | 11.18.09 @ 6:18PM
Baldwin,
You are very correct. Thanks for the to the point insight of your comment. Politics at its finest don't you know---when will the Americans who voted in Obama and the silly congress members wise up and vote them out? Maybe after we are all nearly dead?
Supra Vaider | 11.18.09 @ 10:58PM
Let some bureaucrats read selected studies that support their foregone conclusions and then dictate the rules for the peasants.
ATLmedia| 11.18.09 @ 11:02PM
Not a lot of folks here note that this study is
coming from the Bush appointed panel tasked to study breast cancer.
No, that would break the narrative that Democrats are anti-health.
Lets leave it to the insurance companies-republican cabal-they know whats best...
tailgunner| 11.21.09 @ 4:38PM
'Bush appointed panel'? Prove it, pal.
Democrat healthcare is a DEATH SENTENCE.
Pingback| 11.19.09 @ 7:52AM
Breast Cancer Follies « BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Lockandload | 11.19.09 @ 7:59AM
The Press is reporting that this is an independent group. Not true. This is a governmental agency that makes recommendations for appropriate care. Comprised of Academics, who determines the most good for the most people.
Pingback| 11.24.09 @ 11:29AM
Steynian 398 « Free Canuckistan! links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Lieuer Euy| 1.17.10 @ 7:46AM
I have surfed the net more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It's worth enough for me. Thanks.
Computer Blog Technology | Identify What Is My IP Address Region
www.us-bapeoutlet.com | 4.2.10 @ 7:22AM
www.us-bapeoutlet.com
poptropica| 4.8.10 @ 10:37PM
I’ll have aPoptropica full written walkthrough very soon, but in the meantime, here are some answers to some of the frequently asked questions about Mythology Island. Having trouble? Post a question in the comments and I’ll try to answer it!
Getting Hercules to Help You
Hercules won’t help you until you have all five items from Zeus’ quest. Once you have the five items, bring them to Athena. Zeus will appear and steal them. The big jerk! Once this happens, talk to Athena and she will tell you that Hercules will help you. You’ll need to have the magic mirror from Aphrodite because Hercules doesn’t want to have to walk. He’s so lazy!
Getting the Hydra Scale
You can see how to do this in the videos, but basically you need to jump up when the Hydra is about to strike. He will rear one of his heads back to attack and his eyes will bulge out. When this happens, jump up in the air and then try to land on top of his head. That head will get knocked out. When all five heads get knocked out, the Hydra will be asleep and you can click on him to get one of the scales.Poptropica