Sloppy runs, hits, and errors in the modern Interleague era.
This past week saw the second round of Interleague baseball and, as usual here in the New York metro area, the sparks as well as the horsehide were flying as the Yankees and Mets faced off. Now, I'm not the biggest fan of Interleague play as, in my opinion, it further dilutes the game's uniqueness, in that prior to 1997 it was the only one among the four major sports that respected league integrity. Not to mention that the artificial rivalries it attempts to create are sometimes dull.
But I must admit, that is almost never the case when these clashes take place in the Bronx or Queens. The latest meeting at the new Yankee Stadium, though, was not so much a showcase for chills and thrills as a primer of how the game should and should not be played.
As all the baseball world knows, Met infielder Luis Castillo dropped an easy pop fly on Friday night in the bottom of the ninth, handing the Yanks an unexpected victory. Now, pop-ups and fly balls and grounders have been muffed since the first pair of baseball knickers was donned back in the middle of the 19th century; and as many Mets fans remember, the agony of one Bill Buckner can become the joy of millions. This is baseball, and part of the reason we love it so.
But that one play was a terrific example of the difference between the way the game is played today, and the way it was always played until a few short decades ago. As anyone who's ever played the game -- organized or on a sandlot -- knows, every fly ball is to be caught with "two hands!" And although I'm sure this mantra is still shouted every day on Little League ballfields everywhere, it is clearly ignored by most Major Leaguers.
So too, are other baseball adages like: never let the ball play you; always get in front of a grounder; never make the first or third out at third base; and run hard on every play. This last is still done by some in baseball, most notably by Mark Teixeira on the aforementioned Castillo error. But the fact that this is notable speaks to what is wrong with baseball: the declining quality of play is hurting the game.
Again, physical miscues have always been a part of baseball; indeed, they're built into the scoring process. But every day in nearly every Major League game, mental errors abound. The sorry fact is, half of today's players seem to lack knowledge of the fundamentals of the grand old game while the other half simply have no respect for them. And the game has suffered.
One often hears claims that such and such old-time ballplayers could never compete in today's game because its players are bigger, stronger and faster; that modern training methods are far superior to those of the past. Similarly they point to the specialization of relief pitchers, or claim that expansion has necessitated coast-to-coast travel that is much tougher than in the past.
All of this is poppycock. If the hitters are bigger and stronger, so are the pitchers; and as for modern training methods, I'd love to know the average days spent on the DL for today's players as opposed to those only 30 years ago. Relief pitching? Does anyone who's ever read the history of the game seriously think that owners like Charles Comiskey or Frank Navin would pay five pitchers to just sit around in the bullpen? And I don't know about you, but I'd rather play a ballgame after a five-hour plane ride in first-class than after a 30-hour train trip with no air-conditioning.
No, the sad truth is that most players simply cannot execute what even a light-hitting, backup infielder had to do to stay in the Bigs years ago. Rare is today's hitter who can consistently hit behind a runner or get a butcher-boy knock out of a bunting stance. How about the noxious state of outfield arms? Not every player can be a Bob Meusel or a Dave Parker, but watching some of these guys hurl themselves to the ground while delivering a five hopper to the cutoff man is one of the most painful yet common sights in the modern game.
Does anyone who ever saw film clips of Ty Cobb or Joe DiMaggio execute a plethora of slides really think that more than a handful of today's players can actually run the bases properly? You have to hold your breath when a runner launches into the obligatory and often ineffective head-first lunge toward home, for fear of season-ending injuries.
As for me, I'd take a team filled with a bunch of under-sized old-timers whose baseball fundamentals were impeccable over a team of muscle-bound lugs who, were it not for a postage-sized strike zone, the prohibition of pitching inside and a new tightly-wound baseball served up on every pitch, would barely break the Mendoza line.
Two hands, fellows!
Note: This column will not appear next week due to the upcoming nuptials of its author.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
JP| 6.17.09 @ 7:57AM
Last week Cubs outfielder Milton Bradley, caught a routine fly ball. He turned towards the bleachers while making the catch -obviously posing for the catch. Next, he threw the ball into the stands. The only problem is, there was only 1 out and the opposing team had runners at 1st and 2nd. Earlier Bradley, who was at 2nd, ran to 3rd base on an infield hit to short. He was easily tagged out. Bradley didn't realize until it was too late that first base was open -he should have stayed at 2nd, as there was no force out. A long day for the Cubbies.
Lisa's points are well taken. Another example of how poorly games are played and managed is the role of relief pitchers -especially closers. They make big bucks for pitching so little. Late last year, a Chicago Tribune writer pointed out a little known fact. Going back to 1960, a team with a 2 run lead or greater in the 9th inning wins about 97.8% of the time. Closers come in to games in "close" situations (that is, with a 3 run lead or less -normally in the 9th. There is a 98% chance that a team with a 3 run lead in the 9th will win -no matter who is on the mound. Even sub par closers get 30 saves a season. For pitching 80 innings a season (2400 pitches), the best closers make about $12-18 million. Managers will not put these guys in non-save situations (lest they get an ear full from the player and his agent). But, there are plenty of times during the season when the manager needs to insert a hard throwing closer. Many times a team will find itself in the 5th or 6th inning in serious trouble. They made have had a 4 or 5 run lead earlier, but now that leads is down to 3 runs and bases are loaded. They need to stop the bleeding now, and a stout hard throwing right hander would be perfect. But they don't dare call out the star closer. Thirty years ago, it would have been a no-brainer.
Trotter| 6.17.09 @ 10:29AM
This is a very excellent article and, like much of baseball, the insights within can be extended into our society as a whole. In short, we now live in an extremely sloppy and careless society. In years gone by, sloppiness like that embodied in Milton Bradley would have gotten him a seat on the bench. Now, we sadly must not damage his self-esteem or disrespect him in anyway. Never mind that people that careless and sloppy disrespect the game, their employer and every fan paying to watch him play.
Joe| 6.17.09 @ 1:50PM
One other thing you can note. The winning of the last 2 World Baseball classics was a team located in Asia where the fundamentals are taught and pushed.