Oh, I don’t agree with Paul’s answer. I’m just saying it probably won’t matter that much to the average voter, who only vaguely followed the Plame/Libby matter. My guess is it wasn’t even a seriously considered response — it was just a symbolic answer to show solidarity with a certain kind of antiwar voter and an opportunity for Paul to inject his Iraq views into the debate. Now, there are probably even fewer of those kinds of voters in the Republican primaries than there are people who care deeply about whether Libby gets pardoned, but that’s why Paul’s is largely a symbolic candidacy.
The story of Jazz Jennings, whose parents began their attempts...Read More
“With the law books filled with a great assortment of...Read More
On Thursday, February 23, the two-week-long, nonstop religious revival at...Read More
Peril awaits the America I love if the 45th president...Read More
First things first. When I was a little boy studying...Read More