Donald Trump is baffled as to why his poll numbers are suddenly falling in Iowa in favor of Ben Carson. On Sunday, during an appearance on CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday he said, “I don’t understand Iowa because frankly, I just left and we had tremendous crowds and tremendous enthusiasm.” By today, Trump told the folks at MSNBC’s Morning Joe, “I don’t get it,” as he plans to head back to Iowa today.
Since October 22nd, Trump’s poll numbers against Carson in Iowa have been falling and I think it’s pretty obvious why. That day Trump sent out a tweet which read:
“@mygreenhippo #BenCarson is now leading in the #polls in #Iowa. Too much #Monsanto in the #corn creates issues in the brain? #Trump #GOP”
Donald Trump forgot the first rule of politics – don’t insult people who you are trying to persuade to vote for you.
Sure, Iowans might have enjoyed it when Trump dissed Jeb Bush, insulted Megyn Kelly and threw Jorge Ramos out of his press conference. But Iowans become the target of Trump’s ire they don’t like it so much. And yet this surprises Trump? I can see how though. Almost everything Trump has touched has turned to gold for the past four months. If he could get away with insulting Jeb, Kelly and Ramos then he probably he figured he could away with insulting voters in Iowa. My friends this is called hubris.
A secondary reason for Trump’s decline is his denigration of Ben Carson’s faith. Last Saturday, at a rally in Jacksonville, Florida, Trump said, “I’m Presbyterian. Boy, that’s down the middle of the road, folks, in all fairness. I mean, Seventh-day Adventist, I don’t know about. I just don’t know about.”
I suspect that remark wouldn’t generate much reaction in New Hampshire, but Iowa is far more overtly religious. Forty two percent of likely Iowa GOP caucus voters identify themselves as Evangelical or born again Christian. To be sure, Evangelicals have theological differences with Seventh Day Adventists. But Evangelicals also have substantial theological differences with Mormons. Yet this didn’t prevent Mitt Romney from nearly winning Iowa in 2012. (Indeed, Romney was initially declared the winner until the final count determined that Rick Santorum won the caucus by 34 votes.)
Now I have some pretty strong reservations about Carson. Nevertheless, if Trump wants to regain top spot in Iowa he will have to better than knock Carson’s faith. Of course, if Trump has a strong debate tomorrow night in Colorado then Carson’s lead in Iowa (and nationally) could prove short-lived. But any rebound by Trump could also prove short-lived if he insists on cheaply insulting the people who might vote for him and cheaply insulting his opponents who are well liked by said voters.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.