It seems to me that the premise of John Edwards’s campaign is that a win in Iowa will make his candidacy appear viable enough that the money will keep rolling in to allow him to remain competitive against Hillary and (perhaps) Obama going forward.
My question: Is that really realistic in today’s political world? Moreover, doesn’t Hillary’s geographic base in New York make it very difficult for Edwards to get a foothold among fundraisers there?
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.
