MEMO FOR THE MOVEMENT
RE: Costly lawsuit abuses drive up medical expenses and add billions of dollars to the cost of healthcare, but provide only marginal assistance to injured patients. Yet Congress refuses to address this problem or to make it part of meaningful healthcare reform. Concerned citizens need to raise the issue with Members of Congress and insist it be addressed in any health care reform legislation.
We urge you to contact your Congressmen and Senators and tell them that any healthcare legislation that lacks substantive lawsuit reform with respect to the medical malpractice issue is unacceptable. Any healthcare reform bill passed by Congress should explicitly address the increasingly costly lawsuit abuses that hamper our healthcare system and economy.
ISSUE IN BRIEF:
• Frivolous litigation is a large and growing contributor to healthcare costs. The
Manhattan Institute estimates that the annual direct cost of such litigation is over $30 billion per year — a 2000% increase since 1975. When the indirect costs are added, as set forth below, the total healthcare costs are estimated to exceed $124 billion per year. Doctors spent over $6.3 billion to obtain malpractice liability coverage in 2002, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.
• Flimsy litigation over pharmaceuticals and medical devices acts as a deterrent to innovation in the marketplace, lengthens the time that it takes to get new drugs and devices approved, and adversely affect research and investment decisions on the part of manufacturers.
• “Defensive medicine,” the practice of ordering unnecessary procedures and referrals in order to limit a doctor’s exposure to future litigation, costs consumers several times the cost of direct litigation. The Pacific Research Institute estimates the cost at over $200 billion per year. The Massachusetts Medical Society found that 5 out of 6 doctors admitted they order tests, procedures and referrals, amounting to about 25% of their total charges, solely as protection from lawsuits. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons estimates that the average American family pays an additional $1,700 to $2,000 per year simply to cover the costs of defensive medicine.
• Medical malpractice litigation is inefficient, and poorly compensates victims who often wait years for litigation to conclude, and then collect about 40 cents on the dollar for their injury – the rest going to trial lawyers and administrative expenses. And because the system is so inefficient, most injured parties never collect; those who do are often not those who are actually injured, but those who have somehow caught the attention of a plaintiff’s lawyer. Class action cases brought against drug and device manufacturers return even less, often mere pennies on the dollar, the balance going to the trial lawyers.
• Congress refuses to address the system because of huge campaign contributions from trial lawyers. In the 2010 election cycle, trial lawyers have already given $19,396,155 to Democrats alone. Of the money that lawyers give to campaigns, 82% goes to Democratic candidates. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has received more than any other politician – $977,947. In 2008, Candidate Obama received $43 million from the trial bar.
• Medical malpractice reform has been shown to have real benefits for consumers. The American Tort Reform Association reports that in states where tort caps have been enacted, rural areas are more likely to have OB-GYNs and surgical specialists.
• No healthcare reform legislation can be seriously considered unless it includes provisions to limit the direct and indirect costs of lawsuit abuse. Without meaningful reform, the costs of healthcare cannot be contained or controlled. Unfortunately Congress refuses to address the issue because of the vast sums of campaign money donated from trial lawyers.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE NEED FOR TORT REFORM PLEASE VISIT THESE WEBSITES:
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
(All organizations listed are for identification purposes only)
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.