Counterproductive Conservative Arguments, Cont'd - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Counterproductive Conservative Arguments, Cont’d
by

Lawrence Lindsey is right that Obama’s plan to apply payroll taxes to incomes above $250,000 is economically boneheaded and contrary to Social Security’s status as an earned entitlement. “There is,” as Lindsey writes in the Wall Street Journal, “a very good and principled reason why Social Security taxes are paid on just $102,000 of income: Benefits are calculated based on that same $102,000 of income.”

But it is taking the polemical point too far to endorse FDR’s characterization of the current Social Security program as “a base upon which each one of our citizens may build his individual security through his own individual efforts.” It is really a welfare program merged with a Ponzi scheme to mask its redistributive effects. Defending this system rather than pointing to the lousy rate of return today’s workers can expect on their compulsory “investment” is counterproductive.

Sign up to receive our latest updates! Register


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: The American Spectator, 122 S Royal Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314, http://spectator.org. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!