The Energy Spectator

The Energy Spectator

How Nuclear Will Revive

By 3.11.09

But not because of any "nuclear lobby" -- though maybe because the so-called "smart grid" is anything but smart.
Send to Kindle

The Energy Spectator

Stimulated Energy

By 3.3.09

Live from UC Berkeley, the Coming Age of Alternate Energy, made possible by many a grant from the Stimulus Package.
Send to Kindle

The Energy Spectator

Bio-Fools

By From the March 2009 issue

There are those who think turkey droppings and French fry grease offer a path to energy independence.
Send to Kindle

The Energy Spectator

Proliferating Nonsense

By 2.3.09

The problem with American environmentalism's obsession that abstaining from nuclear power will prevent nuclear proliferation.
Send to Kindle

The Energy Spectator

A Wasted Opportunity

By 1.20.09

Outlining his positions on energy last week, Secretary -designate Steven Chu listed three technologies that "would be nice to have, but are not ready for use, either because they are too expensive to be practical, or not demonstrated to be safe."

They were: 1) sequestering the carbon dioxide from power plants; 2) making ethanol from cellulose; and 3) recycling nuclear fuel to reduce its volume and recover unused fuel.

Well, he's right about the carbon sequestering and cellulose. And two out of three ain't bad.

Carbon sequestering may never be ready for prime time. Robert Socolow, head of the Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton, has calculated that it would take "an oil field six times the size of the smallest of what the industry calls 'giant fields,' of which some 500 exist," to accommodate the average coal plant.

Send to Kindle

Pages