A columnist's call for Republicans to grow up gets a response.
An ideological selection clearly less business friendly than the justice she replaces.
The code word that justifies identity politics, raw judicial power, and, of course, liberalism.
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was an ingenious solution in 1965. Its extension in 2006 was mere political expediency. Now the Supreme Court must decide whether that extension was also constitutional.
In a novel approach, the iowa supremes claim to speak for a whole new generation.
The press hailed it as a victory for patients -- but in the end they're the ones who'll end up paying.
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is no longer about white versus black, but about red versus blue.
The new president may think he's Solomon, but he's not quite there yet.
Sorry, Mr. President. Effectiveness has never been the first measure of a federal action.
Why our present system makes no sense.