The Spectacle Blog

Immigration and Ballots

By on 4.3.06 | 8:04PM

Like David Corn and Byron York (video), I'm not really sure how the immigration debate will affect electoral politics. But Bill Kristol's argument-by-anecdote that restrictionist "yahoos" are on the verge of "driving the party off a cliff" is pretty unconvincing. This part in particular:

Oh Say Can You See…And How’s it Make You Feel?

By on 4.3.06 | 7:31PM

Eric Berlin does a really good job parsing out legitimate dismay over recent immigration protests from xenophobic fears, as a reaction to this much-ballyhooed post over at Daily Kos from earlier today. It should be read in its full conext, but here's a taste:

...I find sealing off the border, or deporting or jailing 11 million illegal immigrants, to be completely irrational ideas. I'm more of an open borders person. That said, it is neither crazy nor racist for Republicans to react as they have been to this weekend's protest. (Although I don't doubt that some of the loonier ideologues on talk radio have taken their vitriol to racist levels.) I was put off by those signs, and I largely support the protestors. Or thought I did, until I saw those signs. To pretend this is only about the flying of the Mexican flag is disingenuous.

Mobile on guest workers

By on 4.3.06 | 4:38PM

My old paper in Mobile, newly renamed the Press-Register, ran this thoughtful editorial on Friday. In some ways it resembles a creative plan from the Kreible Foundation. Both call for slightly different spins on President Bush's "guest worker" ideas for immigrants. Frankly, I have no use for ANYbody who comes here illegally, although I like the idea of expanding LEGAL immigration and/or legal guest worker programs... but only AFTER we control our borders better. If that means a double-tiered fence, so be it. One question, though: How is a "guest worker" program different from an ordinary green card? I admit my ignorance here, but it seems to me that the green card program ALREADY is a guest worker program. And if people ignore that legal process and come here by illegal means, I think we ought to send them to Singapore for punishment. All that said, I'm open to having lawmakers look into the Press-Register AND the Kreible proposals...

Zarqawi Demoted?

By on 4.3.06 | 1:13PM

It looks like Iraq's Public Enemy Number One might be having a bad day at the office.

Punting on Padilla

By on 4.3.06 | 12:20PM

The Supreme Court declined to hear the case now that Jose Padilla is facing criminal charges.

Claudia for Sec Gen

By on 4.3.06 | 10:01AM

Those of us who study the UN and write about its failings owe a lot to the ground-breaking reporting of Claudia Rosett of the Wall Street Journal. The April edition of Commentary has yet another article by Claudia that answers, definitively, the question of How Corrupt is the UN. We really ought to be starting a Claudia for Secretary General campaign. On second thought, I wouldn't wish it on her. She's much too good a person to thrive in that environment.

Hope Springs Eternal

By on 4.3.06 | 9:15AM

Welcome to one of the most glorious days of spring, Opening Day. It's that one special day of the season when my Cubs are guaranteed to be tied for first. From here on out, all bets are off.

Re: Tehran Apocalypse

By on 4.3.06 | 8:51AM

To catch up to a few of our faithful readers:

Fitz: You're lucky. We have to watch this stuff, you don't. Someday, we should compare my Bayer/Tylenol budget to yours.

AndyDiP: The Dems aren't lightweights. They just can't stand the idea of wasting time that could be spent planning tax increases on trivialities such as the survival of our nation. To paraphrase Peggy Noonan, in 1994 the Dems lost the Congress. In 2000, they lost the Presidency. And then they lost their minds...

Debbie: I believe that the Iranians don't yet have a deployable nuke for two reasons. First, none of my sources - whom I trust, based on their track records and my judgment of them personally - think so. Second, if they did have nuclear weapons, they'd be using them to proclaim their hegemony over the Middle East and to give cover for a huge multinational terrorist rampage. The only thing holding them back is the lack of these weapons.

The Nexus of Van Halen and George Orwell’s 1984s

By on 4.2.06 | 8:19PM

Drew Cline--occassional Spectator contributor, Union Leader editorial page editor, and all around great guy--has posted a funny bit on the UL blog you'd all do well to read in full. Here's a taste:

EMI has removed cigarettes from the hands of Ringo Starr, John Lennon and Paul McCartney for its reissue of the 1964 Capitol Albums Vol. 2. Ironically, George, the only one not smoking on the cover, is the one who died of lung cancer. Evidently they chopped off two of Ringo's fingers when removing his cigarette. (That's what you get when you outsource your graphics department to Albania.)

Clearly we are all doomed and it is only a matter of time before the ultimate irony occurs and the anti-smoking zealots have the cigarettes erased from the cover of Van Halen's 1984.

The Katherine Harris Meltdown Continues…

By on 4.2.06 | 6:54PM

Rep. Katherine Harris's top campaign staff (manager, communications director, adviser, and others) resigned yesterday. Wow. Her response? She didn't need them! She's better off without them! Double wow.

Amazingly, Bill Nelson looks snug for November.