I just read Howard Kurtz's piece at FNC decrying the New York Times decision to print Darren Wilson's address.
Kurtz doesn't conclude the NYT did this intentionally, but that they owe Wilson an apology.
An apology is the tip of the iceberg. You cannot tell me this wasn't done on purpose. Just like when Spike Lee tweeted what he thought was the address of George Zimmerman.
What other reason is there to publish Wilson's address if not incite violence against him or at the very minimum force him to move his family from their home and otherwise make his life a living hell?
I say to hell with The New York Times. I hope Darren Wilson sues the Gray Lady for every penny it's worth.