The Spectacle Blog

Sounds of Solidarity

By on 10.3.06 | 3:52PM

"Most Republicans are sticking together."-- Speaker Hastert's spokesman on the Foley affair

Good grief! Isn't there another way to phrase this?

Who Can You Trust?

By on 10.3.06 | 2:38PM

There's an Associated Press story out on the wire with the mis-titled headline, "Bush: Democrats shouldn't be trusted to run Congress." Of course since it's the AP, it's running on many news Web sites and will run in hundreds of print newspapers in the next day or so, with near-identical variations of the headline. ABC's affiliate here in Raleigh even puts the "Democrats shouldn't be trusted" in quotation marks, as though the president had literally uttered that statement.

I Said Nix to Hastert Long Ago

By on 10.3.06 | 1:02PM

The calls now for Hastert to resign are all well and good, but a scandal of some sort, involving an arrogance of power that involves being blind to ethical or moral considerations, was eminently predictable for years. Back at the beginning of 2005, for instance, I lamented in The New Republic the loss of an ethical compass in the GOP leadership. In these very pages earlier this year I said Hastert should not be re-elected as speaker. In January of this year Rep. Jeff Flake and others demanded an entirely new round of leadership elections.

Re: Stein on Foley Scandal

By on 10.3.06 | 11:44AM

The Washington Post, in a seeming answer to Ben Stein's piece yesterday, analyzes why it is that Republicans are more susceptible to hypocrisy allegations than Democrats when sex scandals erupt. Reason, in a nutshell: the GOP's socially conservative image.

"The reality is that Democrats seem to get away with more," says Chuck Todd, editor in chief of the Hotline, a daily political journal. "They can have an affair and bail [themselves] out. There's a lower threshold for Republicans. I guess it's more of a hypocrisy thing," he adds, because such scandals put Republicans at odds with the party's socially conservative image.

Todd thinks he knows who's to blame for this: "It's the media, to be honest. What is the standard 'gotcha' story in the media? It's hypocrisy. If we can prove hypocrisy, we have a story. . . . So in a sex scandal, the bar for Republicans is lower."

Lieberman Says Promised Seniority

By on 10.3.06 | 11:04AM

The Hill reports that Lieberman said the Democratic Party's leadership has assured him that he would keep his seniority even if he beats Lamont as an Independent. If this is true, it's significant, because it reveals that Democrats have accepted the fact that Lieberman probably will win and that keeping Lieberman's seat Democratic is more important that appeasing the Kos wing of the party. The further interesting wrinkle is that if Democrats win control of the Senate, Lieberman, the most pro-Bush Democrat, would become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs panel, which is primarily responsible for investigating the executive branch.

Re: Foley Ugliness

By on 10.3.06 | 10:48AM

This is a huge blow to Republicans because any scandal that involves sex will reach a broad audience. After all of the hubub surrounding the Abramoff scandal, it had a relatively small amount of political fallout (if any). The Randy "Duke" Cunningham and Bob Ney resignations over bribery didn't have a widespread effect becuase people discount for politicians being corrupt. But the Foley story has tabloid appeal and should continue to generate headlines. If the trail about how much Republican leaders knew and when they knew it runs dry in the next few days, the damage may be limited to Foley's congressional district. But if revelations start coming out in dribs and drabs over the next few weeks suggesting Hastert knew more than he's saying he did, this could be the final nail in the coffin for Republicans. Democrats may have in the Foley scandal the perfect symbol of Republicans becoming too arrogant with power, adding more force to the "Throw the bums out" argument.