George Soros is widely understood to be the mastermind behind a global effort to institute a very significant wealth redistribution scheme. He loves to say that the rich should be poorer, the poor should be richer and that a high rate of taxation should be responsible for bridging the divide. In pursuit of making this agenda real, George Soros has poured millions, if not billions, in the coffers of soak-the-rich progressive politicians across the globe, but mostly in the United States, where his influence is felt across the Democratic party. He is the crowned king and leader of the great unwashed - those merry but dedicated few who still think Che Guevara is a hero to millions, that Communism would succeed if they only just tried it one more time, and that grilled cheese sandwiches are best made on a carbourator idling outside of a Grateful Dead cover band concert.
The Spectacle Blog
We all know that Marco Rubio has an iPod (do they make iPods anymore? Is that still a thing? I haven't seen one since, like, 2006), full of the latest from our nation's brightest and best hip hop stars, and has distinct, if detailed opinions on all of the major issues facing today's rappers and rap fans. He prefers West Coast rap to East Coast rap, does not believe that Lil' Wayne has the right to call himself the new Tupac (who he believes was more insightful than his rap rival Biggie Smalls), and, while he doesn't dislike Pitbull, believes that his music is less message and more booty.
Which probably explains why, in the great race to court Pitbull as a campaign asset - his ability to generate enthusiasm in the Hispanic community is, apparently, unparalleled - the clear leader in the game is not Marco Rubio, but Jeb Bush.
Last night, as Baltimore's riots finally wound down to a bonfire, the White House again celebrated a major, five-star event destined to showcase the Obama Administration's deep connection to the poor people of this fair land. Last night's fete was in honor of the Japanese Prime Minister who was in town on an official state visit.
While Michelle Obama is known, generally, for her lavish design choices — remember, for a moment, that $2000 sundress that looked like it had been purchased at Target — last night, possibly in response to criticism of the White House and DC media's out-of-touch Correspondents' Dinner performance, the First Lady instead chose a modest gown by Japanese-American designer Tadashi Shoji that would likely retail for around $700, much less than the average monthly rent in most urban areas.
The ramifications of the same-sex marriage decision are many whichever way it goes. One could tell that from the comments and questions from the bench on Tuesday. However, the legal principle involved is very straightforward. And in deciding the case, the Court will be making a statement about the Court itself that will be even more far-reaching than the decision.
The legal question is whether the Court should follow legal precedent, so well established that it has never been seriously challenged up until now, or whether the Court should change with the times and make decisions based upon what it perceives those changes to be. The old-precedent-versus-evolving-Constitution argument has been with us for some time, but with the liberal interpretation always giving lip service to precedent, too. With the marriage case, however, there can be no avoiding what is really going on. The issue is too clear to sustain the usual word games.
Emily has a lot of fun with Bernie Sanders' White House bid which is expected to be launched tomorrow.
However, I look at it a little bit differently.
In February 2011, I spoke with Sanders briefly after he appeared at a gathering here in Boston. It was not long after he filibustered the tax compromise between President Obama and the Republican Congress. Sanders wasn't exactly enthusiastic about Obama. So I asked him if he thought he'd face a primary challenge. Sanders replied, "I wouldn't be surprised, but I don't have the answer for that."
I have read Hillary Clinton's speech on criminal justice reform and have three observations I would like to make.
First, Hillary gave the speech at Columbia University under the auspices of the David Dinkins Leadership and Policy Forum. Hillary said that Dinkins "leadership helped lay the foundation for the dramatic drop in crime in the years that followed." Those would be the years that Rudy Giuliani was mayor. Let me put this way. Would Hillary have walked through Times Square while Dinkins was mayor?
Second, Hillary bemoaned this country's high incarceration rates:
It's a stark fact that the United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world's total prison population. The numbers today are much higher than they were 30, 40 years ago, despite the fact that crime is at historic lows.
You have to hand it to John Kerry. Few people have the stick-to-it-iveness of our fair Secretary of State. Say what you want about the man, but when he commits to something, no matter how undeniably stupid, the man stays true to his commitment.
Even in the face of overwhelming evidence that Iran (1) has no intention of signing any sort of nuclear non-proliferation agreement and (2) persists in believing it would be best if the United States was obliterated from the face of the Earth, John Kerry is still trying, desperately, to make friends. He's like that girl at the slumber party who happily ignores that her training bra ended up in the freezer overnight because she's so desperate to be included. I almost feel sorry for him, if I wasn't 100% sure that this is all going to end terribly for either us or our allies (or both).
America, you asked for Elizabeth Warren (D-$8.5M Net Worth), and despite all evidence to the contrary, persisted in believing that she was a worthwhile potential candidate. Well, your hard work has paid off. No, Elizabeth Warren is not going to declare her intent to run, though she's 100% certain that she is moving Hillary as far leftward as her little bowl-haircutted Native American noggin possibly can, she's merely inspired your next contestant.
Ladies and gentlemen of Iowa, we hope you like Bernie Sanders. All of the progressive lunacy, none of the restrained dignity.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will make an announcement on Thursday about his intentions to run for president, a source close to his thinking tells CNN.
Sanders, an independent senator who caucuses with Democrats, has been inching towards a presidential run for months by traveling the country and speaking to liberal groups in critical presidential states like Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.
It was interesting to hear that Rand Paul declare the other day that removing Saddam Hussein from power was "a mistake".
I must say that I am inclined to agree with the junior Senator from Kentucky. Indeed, after President Obama failed to obtain an extension to the Status of Forces agreement in October 2011, I posed the question, "Should Saddam Have Stayed in Power?"
Nevertheless, I am not very impressed with Rand Paul's comment for two reasons.
In case you were wondering whether Harry Reid was going to tone down his rhetoric as his tenure in Congress winds down - after all, he's down to only one eye - I believe that this video, via Free Beacon, can answer all of the questions you might have.
The GOP submitted a budget several weeks ago, and now its under discussion, because if there's anything that can get America riled up and interested in politics, its a lengthy, C-SPAN discussion on how each party plans to spend trillions of dollars of your money, but in the most responsible way possible. This morning, Harry Reid took the floor to speak out against cutting back on spending and embracing a more austere government lifestyle by making a comprehensive, if compelling case that the GOP budget was a figment of the imagination, utterly impossible to accomplish in our day and age.
No, just kidding: he compared the GOP budget's commitment to balance to the earthquake that has killed hundreds, if not thousands, in Nepal.