The Spectacle Blog
Nothing surprises us about government employees dropping the ball or overlooking something, even at the NSA.
Of course, our friends at the ACLU believe nothing is by accident, and that all federal employees operate at genius level so as to better perpetrate the numerous plots their overlords, the evil cabal of neocons, are perpetrating on the world.
I've got my hand way up. Sorry, Congressman, but if cookies shock you, you don't what they are. It makes perfect sense that the default system would include persistent cookies; they're extremely common. And as Ed Morrissey notes, it's really hard to think of any pernicious use that the NSA would even have for cookie data.
By the way, I've got a cookie from spectator.org on my system that's set to expire in January 2038, so you'd better disable cookies on your browser right now if you're paranoid.
In the AP article linked above, a representative of the Center for Democracy and Technology, Ari Schwartz said,
Considering the surveillance power the NSA has, cookies are not exactly a major concern... But it does show a general lack of understanding about privacy rules when they are not even following the government's very basic rules for Web privacy.
In other words, the evidence indicates a dumb mistake.
I'd like to see a show of hands -- anyone who believes the NSA, the world's premier surveillance organization, which employs the top computer minds in the world, and enjoys a budget in the billions, left "cookies" on its website by "mistake." No hands? I thought so.
In case you missed it on the John Batchelor show last night, guest Malcolm Hoenline broke the news that Japanese prime minister Koizumi is making a trip to Israel in the early spring. He's expected to meet with Ariel Sharon and make several other stops in the region, including with Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president. Koizumi will pressure Abbas to act more directly against terrorism and will condition Japanese aid to the PA on it. That's a very bold step by Koizumi, and will put Japan at odds with the EU and Russia.
This comes soon after Koizumi's government announced it would deploy a ballistic missile defense in cooperation with us. Japan's emergence is, as my next book will show, a direct result of China's massive military buildup. But instead of following in the EUnuchs' steps, Japan is responding in its own defense and in defense of freedom.
Those naming the mainstream media as their Enemy of the Year (below) won't be dissuaded after learning about Primetime's segment tonight. Diane Sawyer will "report" (read: speculate) about a Pope Joan, a rumored female pope in the ninth century.
In a Video on Demand preview at the ABC News website, the anchorette asks the segment's producer, Ann Reynolds, what evidence exists of Pope Joan. Reynolds responds, "You're talking about the dark ages. t is almost impossible to prove anything. There's no sense of history as you or I would accept it. There's no sense of proof as a news person would accept it. But it's an amazing mystery." Hmmm... tabloids usually run their gossip yarns with more evidence than that.
But what do historians say? Reynolds answers, "They argue back and forth. There's so little hard evidence that I don't think anybody can say it's true. There are people who can say they believe it because of the preponderance of evidence. But we talked to all sorts of them and they have arguments back and forth."
Something about the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Board Decision didn't sit right with me. Okay, a few things: the huffy tone, the clumsy history and connections between the 1920s creationists and present-day intelligent design crowd.
But U of Chicago law prof Al Alschuler nails it:
If fundamentalism still means what it meant in the early twentieth century, however -- accepting the Bible as literal truth -- the champions of intelligent design are not fundamentalists. They uniformly disclaim reliance on the Book and focus only on where the biological evidence leads. The court's response -- "well, that's what they say, but we know what they mean" -- is uncivil, an illustration of the dismissive and contemptuous treatment that characterizes much contemporary discourse. Once we know who you are, we need not listen. We've heard it all already.