The Spectacle Blog

Re: Armitage? Duh

By on 8.28.06 | 9:52AM

For what it's worth, Robert Novak said on "Meet the Press" that he never reveals a source unless that source reveals himself, but added that he thinks it's time for his source to come forward.

Armitage? Duh.

By on 8.27.06 | 10:55AM

David Corn and Michael Isikoff have a new book which confirms that Richard Armitage was the original Plame leaker. Close observers had already figured this out; Tom Maguire, for one, zeroed in on Armitage months ago. Maguire's most recent post on the topic, noting Armitage's (vague) association with the McCain campaign team, came just this Tuesday.

The corollary to this revelation has been equally clear all this time: Pace the anti-Bush storyline, the Plame kerfuffle was not a case of the White House intentionally blowing Plame's super-secret cover to attack her husband.

Gloves Off

By on 8.25.06 | 10:07PM

Our buddy Patrick Hynes weighed in today against Jim Antle and his piece on Mitt Romney by casting doubt on Romney's conservative bona fides -- just the sort of thing one might expect from someone now working for John McCain and evidently worried that Romney is outflanking McCain on the right.

To answer a few of Patrick's specific complaints: I would bet McCain is effectively more pro-choice than Romney these days, and that McCain's suppression of the First Amendment via McCain-Feingold incumbent protection dwarfs any of the coerciveness in Romney's health-care reform. As for who Romney is surrounding himself with -- the puny-minded article Patrick links to tells us nothing on that score -- I think a bigger worry should be McCain, whose current brain trust includes such conservative stalwarts as Colin Powell, Richard Armitage and Gerry Parsky.

But you know Patrick's really ready to throw mud for his man when he for all intents blames Romney for the recent Big Dig tragedy. I was wondering who'd be the first to take that route.

French Innovation

By on 8.25.06 | 5:08PM

Ms.Alliott-Marie, the French Defense Ministress, has proclaimed a new French strategy for the Son of UNIFIL force the French are finally going to "man." According to that Wall St. Journal report, Ms. Minister said, ""I don't want to send men so that they can be humiliated on the ground." Which, since the death of Napoleon, has been the almost-unvaried situation of the French forces.

She also criticised those who are denigrating the French effort. Ma'am, we only aim to please.

Jackie Mason Sues Jews For Jesus

By on 8.25.06 | 12:19PM

The AP reports on occasional TAS contributor Jackie Mason:

NEW YORK - Jackie Mason is suing Jews for Jesus, claiming the missionary group damaged him by using his name and likeness in a pamphlet.

"While I have the utmost respect for people who practice the Christian faith, the fact is, as everyone knows, I am as Jewish as a matzo ball or kosher salami," the 75-year-old comedian said in documents filed in state Supreme Court in Manhattan....

The pamphlets feature an image of Mason next to the words "Jackie Mason ... A Jew for Jesus!?" with information inside that outlines the similarities between Jews and Christians.

"The pamphlet uses my name, my likeness, my 'shtick' (if you will), and my very act, which is derived from my personality, to attract attention and converts," Mason said in an affidavit.

Israel’s Right Turn

By on 8.25.06 | 12:08PM

The Jerusalem Post reports that if a new election were held today, the right-wing parties would take control of the Israeli government:

A Ma'agar Mohot poll, broadcast on Channel 2 on Thursday evening found that if the election was held today, the Likud and Israel Beiteinu would each win 24 seats, Kadima would fall from 29 to 14, and Labor would fall from 19 to only 9.

Meanwhile, another poll, reported in the Guardian, shows that a majority of Israelis want Olmert to go:

Romney and Evangelicals

By on 8.25.06 | 10:36AM

James Antle's piece today makes a good case for how Romney could appeal to evangelicals in 2008, despite his Mormonism. While he may not be the ideal choice for evangelicals, given his previous pro-choice stances, I think he may be able to market himself as a born again pro-lifer like Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush before him-- especially against Giuliani, given his liberal social views, and McCain, who just makes conservatives' skin crawl.

Politically Correct Astronomy

By on 8.25.06 | 10:32AM

Those insensitive astronomers are at it again, writes the New York Times:

Pluto, with its small size and oddball orbit, should never have been deemed a planet in the first place. Henceforth there will be eight planets, at least three dwarf planets, and tens of thousands of "smaller solar system bodies," like comets and asteroids. Our only regret is that the astronomers chose the name "dwarf planets" for Pluto's new category instead of abandoning the word entirely when discussing these less-than-planetary bodies.
They're not dwarves! They're little planets!

Nothing is safe from liberalism's speech codes. When is someone on 43rd Street going to realize that Gail Collins is a enormous embarrassment?

Wake Up, Youse Guys

By on 8.25.06 | 6:05AM

I'm subbing for Bill Bennett again today (6-9 am on Salem Radio Net). We have a heavy-duty show lined up. Guests include Cong. Pete Hoekstra - House Intel Chairman - to talk about the report they released yesterday, probably also have Barham Salih, Iraq's Deputy PM and my pal John McIntyre of Hope you can tune in. Call in number is 866-680-6464.

New Euphemism

By on 8.24.06 | 6:31PM

In the press release for its new study on so-called voter supression, People for the American Way (sic) uses the term "felon disenfranchisement policies." As a friend of mine puts it, that's so much better than saying "We want violent thugs and rapists to vote."

And of course, PFAW has to whine about "Overly strict voter identification requirements that make it harder for the up to 10 percent of Americans who do not have government-issued photo IDs to cast a vote." Requiring a drivers license to vote is "overly strict"? Next time I try to cash a check at a bank, I'll try that "overly strict" complaint when they ask for ID, just to see how it goes over.

There is one reason and one reason only for not requiring ID to vote: making it easier to cheat.