The Spectacle Blog

Hollywood Knows America

By on 11.14.05 | 8:57AM

Another sign that the Left Coast just doesn't get it. Not happy to just make a good TV show -- and a dubious show at that -- big time Hollywood producers are making a superhero show where all of the bad guys are oil companies or businessmen or "polluters" in general.

Send to Kindle


By on 11.14.05 | 8:43AM

Sen. Jay Rockefeller has a lot of explaining to do given his comments over the weekend that he was traveling around the Middle East back in 2002 telling Arab governments that the President had already made up his mind to go to war with Iraq.

It isn't clear -- as in other situations -- that Rockefeller may have leaked national security intelligence materials, but it is clear that he was working against the interests of his own country for what sounded like nothing more than an opportunity to strut around on foreign soil like a big-time politico.

Last week, according to a Republican staffer on Senate Intelligence, Rockefeller's personal office called in committee staff associated with the Intelligence commitee to measure just what, if any, damage they might be dealing with in a full investigation of the "Black Site Scandal." They must be getting nervous.

Send to Kindle

Matthews Revisionism

By on 11.13.05 | 10:28AM

Seeking to justify the Dems newest use of their Vietnam Playbook -- saying the president lied us into Iraq the same way LBJ lied us into Vietnam -- Chris Matthews said this morning that the attack on US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin never happened. The Tonkin Gulf resolution, passed by Congress and authorizing military intervention in Vietnam, has always been used by the party of George McGovern to condemn the Vietnam war. The problem that Matthews, Dean and the rest have is that the Tonkin Gulf attack - and the threat of Saddam -- weren't fiction.

Send to Kindle

Zawahiri and the Queen

By on 11.13.05 | 7:46AM

We can't prove a cause and effect relationship between the two events, but al-Queda's condemnation of Queen Elizabeth as "one of the severest enemies of Islam" comes only a few days after Tony Blair's parliamentary defeat on one of his proposals to toughen Brit law on terrorism. The message -- in a videotape of UBL's #2, Ayman al-Zawahiri, is viewed by Brit security as a direct threat to the Queen.

The timing of the message is worth thinking about. Parliament - faced with Blair's proposal that terrorist suspects be held for up to 90 days without charge -- quailed. Because the July London bombers were all apparently Brit citizens, something has to be done to increase police power to interdict terrorist attacks, and to keep suspects in custody who would otherwise certainly flee or carry out attacks. Blair's first big attempt to do that has failed. In response - perhaps - comes this threat to the Queen. We hope al-Q lacks the power to attack the Queen, but whether it does or not, this whole exercise is a propaganda coup for al-Q at Britain's expense and - ultimately - ours as well.

Send to Kindle

Re: My Way

By on 11.12.05 | 1:31PM

Here's a better link to that October 27 column, with the aforementioned prediction intact (the version was updated midday, after the Miers withdrawal announcement, into a hybrid between the original column and the brief for Ted Olson that ran the next day in the New York Sun).

Send to Kindle

Pol Roger?

By on 11.12.05 | 12:56PM

Bob: Pol Roger? Well, I suppose if you have to drink French, that's permissible. But I assume nothing would pass your lips short of the Winston Churchill cuvee.

Send to Kindle

My Way

By on 11.12.05 | 12:26PM

Looking back at the lovely month of October and pronunciamentos made by me during the month I am startled.

History is going my way. In my October 27 column I predicted that Harriet Miers's ill-conceived nomination to the high court would be withdrawn owing to the White House's perfectly sensible reluctance to allow the snoops of the Senate to see documents relating to her work as White House counsel. Whamo! By the next day she was withdrawing for that very reason.

Send to Kindle

Izzat al Duri?

By on 11.12.05 | 12:08PM

Reports of the death (by peaceful means) of Saddam's former right-hand thug Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri are still unconfirmed. If al-Duri is dead, it would be a terrific blow against the terrorist insurgency in Iraq. While we remain focused on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the top al-Queda man in Iraq, al-Duri was (is?) one of the primary commanders of the Sunni insurgents. If he's dead, that's big time good news.

Send to Kindle

Some Offense, Finally

By on 11.11.05 | 8:07PM

The President brought his A game today.  Finally, after months of suffering the most outrageous slanders his political opponents could dish out, the Commander in Chief answered the bell and came out swinging.

The weak response from the likes of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry only shows how devoid of honor and dignity the Democrats truly are. The President had finally had enough of their lies. And this President has finally learned that these are not his friends, nor are they reasonable people with whom one can find some common ground. Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest seem so small and shrill and insignificant in the wake of the President's thunder.

Send to Kindle

More Wilson Meltdown

By on 11.11.05 | 4:59PM

Earlier this afternoon, I had a very unpleasant conversation with Mr. Larry Johnson, a former CIA officer who is now out and about defending Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame. Johnson, in my interview with him, confirmed some things, left some open, but revealed something startling: the defense of Joe Wilson is apparently being run from inside the CIA.

Johnson came up on the scope when he accused Gens. Paul Vallely and Tom McInerny of falsely attacking Wilson. Vallely, you may recall, said last week on John Batchelor's ABC radio show that Wilson -- husband of CIA employee Valerie Plame -- had told Vallely (a year before Robert Novak outed Plame) that Plame was a CIA employee. I asked Johnson about several points regarding his defense of Wilson and attack on Vallely. Johnson was very specific about certain things.

Send to Kindle