Did you know James Holmes gave money to Barack Obama?
It's true. And I knew this yesterday morning.
Why didn't I write this up for The American Spectator to publish as a blog post -- on the spot?
For one very simple, very elemental reason.
In the first flush of the carnage in Colorado yesterday morning, when the shooter's name had made it to the airwaves but not much else about him, everybody with a computer and a phone was scouring all manner of Internet sites to find out about James Holmes.
In my case I found that James Holmes was on the Federal Election Commission rolls as an Obama contributor. The problem? I had absolutely no idea whether this was the same James Holmes who was the Colorado movie murderer -- and with good reason. "James Holmes" or "Jim Holmes" are not exactly odd names in America. Indeed, the FEC had dozens of "James Holmes" on its contributor lists -- as did all manner of other sites have the same two names. In fact, there were several James Holmes or Jim Holmes on social sites listed as living in or around Aurora, Colorado or what we had learned was his family home -- San Diego, California. In the latter case, there was a Jim Holmes who professed himself to be a "lefty." With enough persistence one could learn their ages and place of residence. That Jim Holmes in the San Diego area was long over 24.
The James Holmes who was an Obama contributor was from an East Coast state -- and there was not a shred of proof that I could find that he was the James Holmes who was by then the subject of intense scrutiny.
So I never wrote him up. James Holmes and his connection to President Obama never made it to The American Spectator. Good thing -- because if I had done that I would have looked like an idiot, and deservedly so.
Obviously standards are a little looser over at ABC News. Where yesterday ABC News anchor and longtime Democratic Party operative George Stephanopoulos called on correspondent Brian Ross to tell America breathlessly that he had found a page for "Jim Holmes" with the Colorado Tea Party.
In other words, Brian Ross did exactly what I did not do. He went with a completely false story -- and clearly it was because over at the liberal precincts of ABC News they wanted to smear the Tea Party. They weren't interested in the truth -- they were interested in the liberal politics.
So today they have egg on their face.
Here's Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center on the episode at ABC:
Bozell: ABC's Disgraceful Rush to Judgment on the Tea Party
This morning, in the aftermath of the unspeakable Colorado massacre that claimed at least 12 innocent American lives and injured dozens more, ABC "news" investigative reporter Brian Ross appeared on ABC's Good Morning America and made the outrageous, irresponsible, and completely unfounded claim that the alleged gunman, 24-year-old Jim Holmes, is a member of the Tea Party. Apparently Ross has learned absolutely nothing from the media's disgraceful rush to judgment and dissemination of misinformation following the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in January 2011.
That's twice now that the "news" media have falsely implicated the Tea Party in murder.
In his brazen attempt to smear the Tea Party, Ross speculated on national television to millions of viewers that Holmes was a member of the Tea Party based on a social media webpage. When it became apparent that this accusation was false, ABC offered an apology, but they chose to release it online where only a fraction of Good Morning America's misinformed viewers would see it. In addition, Ross had the gall to appear on ABC News to correct himself without offering an on-air apology.
Ross slandered every American even loosely associated with the Tea Party, and he owes them an apology. He must also apologize to Good Morning America's audience, the James Holmes he falsely implicated of mass murder, and, most of all, to each and every person in Colorado directly or indirectly affected by this horrific tragedy.
In a moment that demanded clarity of thought and purpose, Ross rushed to slander those with whom he does not agree politically, exposing the depths and darkness of his political prejudices. Shame on Brian Ross, and shame on ABC News for not yet demanding he look directly into the camera and beg forgiveness for politicizing this terrible event. Ross' meek Twitter apology is a cynically insincere slap in the face to us all.
It's fair to ask.
What was going on in the heads of this liberal media outlet when they ran on-air with a story linking the Tea Party to the Colorado shooter -- a story they had not found to be fact.
Safe to say, it was not the same thing that went through my head when I found out that James Holmes was a contributor to Barack Obama.
I was after the truth. ABC was after the Tea Party.
Share this Article
Like this Article
Print this ArticlePrint Article