The Spectacle Blog

Social Justice and Detroit’s Decay

Marvin Olasky today discusses the debate on "social justice" between Glenn Beck and Jim Wallis, and relates his personal experience with the Leftist evangelist.

By on 3.31.10 | 10:39AM

Marvin Olasky today discusses the debate on "social justice" between Glenn Beck and Jim Wallis, and relates his personal experience with the Leftist evangelical:

Do those historical wrinkles mean that the term should not be used? No, but it should certainly be defined. We can study the 150 or so times that mishpat in Hebrew and kreesis in Greek—words commonly translated as "justice"—appear in the Bible. Biblically, justice—tied to righteousness—is what promotes faith in God, not faith in government. Prophets criticized not entrepreneurs but those who combined economic and political power to lord it over others, as today's bureaucrats and corporate/government partnerships tend to do.

I can understand Glenn Beck's frustration. As the Beck-Wallis tempest swirled on March 11, I spent 3½ hours in a long-arranged debate with Wallis at Cedarville University. He kept trying to position himself as a centrist rather than a big government proponent. Furthermore, modern usage by liberal preachers and journalists is thoroughly unbiblical: Many equate social justice with fighting a free enterprise system that purportedly keeps people poor but in reality is their best economic hope.

The City of Detroit offers a perfect illustration of the effects of 50 years of government "social justice" programs, as Pajamas Media's Steven Crowder explained in December:

Send to Kindle

Like this Article

Print this Article

Print Article