The Spectacle Blog

Socialist Republicans

By on 3.16.06 | 10:17AM

Lost in yesterday's news was the victory by Democrat Sens. Ron Wyden and Olympia Snowe in getting price controls placed on pharmaceuticals. The amendment passed with Republican support, and allows Medicare to negotiate over prices for pharmaceuticals that are part of the Bush Administration's prescription drug plan.

The official word is that these aren't price controls. But, in fact, they are. Republicans privately were complaining that they couldn't afford to alienate seniors with a "No" vote. It's this lack of courage to do the right thing that not only makes the Republicans look bad to conservatives, but it feeds into the growing frustration with the Bush Administration. By saying no to Wyden-Snowe, they would have been saying no to the president's drug plan, which would have been saving the President from himself. And that's a good prescription.

Novak on Judges!!!!!!

By on 3.16.06 | 9:12AM

In his column today, Bob Novak hits a topic that everybody should be banging the drums on: all the unconfirmed judicial nominees still languishing. It absolutely astonishes me that Senate Republicans remain so stupid -- and I do mean stupid, as in dumb, utterly without sense, lame-brained, moronic, idiotic -- as to STILL not realize that judges are a winning issue for them. Whenever the topic is judges, the right wins. One reason is that -- even though judicial conservatism isn't really concerned with "results" -- when the issues are put in political terms, the right is on the popular side of every issue that swirls around judgeships. On partial birth abortion, we win and they lose. On law and order, we win and they lose. On faith references in the public square, we win and they lose. We win on eminent domain. We win on judicially imposed homosexual "marriage." And so on and so on: We win, we win, we win.

Draft Gore

By on 3.16.06 | 8:30AM

Northern Virginia's Rep. Jim Moran, a Jack Murtha booster, is backing another great and sturdy political horse: Al Gore for 2008. For most folks, Gore "jumped the shark" long, long ago when he started giving arm-swinging, red faced speeches about the horrors of the Bush administration. But for the angry left, he's a reliable perennial also-ran, like Eugene Debs. Al Gore: use in case of emergency.

Harris Matters

By on 3.16.06 | 8:21AM

So Harris stays and essentially self-finances. We got a clarification last night that should Harris resign from the House to focus on the campaign, her staff would not be fired, but would instead continue working through the special election period. Our point was that Harris would "essentially" be firing her staff, given that she wouldn't be around after the resignation, and while constituents always have issues, it helps to have a someone at the top.

As for the Senate campaign, recent polls have Harris down to Sen. Bill Nelson by 20 points or more. We're dubious of most of those polls, which have a respondent pool of between 500 to 600 people. That puts the margin of error up in the five point range, which is awful for a serious political or opinion poll. Twenty points is a big number, and so is 15 or even ten points. But people should take a deep breath and hope that the national party can help her right her ship.

That said, we keep hearing that there are more shoes to drop related to Harris's sale of home down in Florida, as well as other issues, and she continues to have problems finding senior management staff for her campaign. All not good.

New National Security Strategy Report

By on 3.16.06 | 6:34AM

The White House, in support of the president's latest speeches on the war, has just released a new National Security Strategy document. It reaffirms preemptive action and - still - relies on the spread of democracy to be the endgame of the war against terrorists and terrorist nations. Here's a few excerpts:

"While the War on Terror is a battle of ideas, it is not a battle of religions. The transnational terrorists confronting us today exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom. These terrorists distort the idea of jihad into a call for murder against those they regard as apostates or unbelievers – including Christians, Jews, Hindus, other religious traditions, and all Muslims who disagree with them. Indeed, most of the terrorist attacks since September 11 have occurred in Muslim countries – and most of the victims have been Muslims…

The Bishops and the Gay Agenda

By on 3.16.06 | 6:20AM

Jeff Jacoby takes the hypocrisies of gay agenda advocates to pieces in a magnificent column yesterday, here. Key graf:

"Is this a sign of things to come? In the name of nondiscrimination, will more states force religious organizations to swallow their principles or go out of business? Same-sex adoption is becoming increasingly common, but it is still highly controversial. Millions of Americans would readily agree that gay and lesbian couples can make loving parents, yet insist nevertheless that kids are better off with loving parents of both sexes. That is neither a radical view nor an intolerant one, but if the kneecapping of Catholic Charities is any indication, it may soon be forbidden."


By on 3.15.06 | 10:09PM

I have defended Katherine Harris here of late, as you know.

The interview tonight with Sean Hannity was an unmitigated mess. called this one correctly. She's done.

Mea culpa, dear readers....paging Jack Nicklaus....urgent!!!!

Harris Matters

By on 3.15.06 | 3:50PM

Her refusal to step, well, aside, Harris's decision to resign her House seat -- if this is what she decides to do -- probably won't wash well with those young staffers who were counting on her being in the House for a while. This is a staff that has taken a beating of late, and to watch their boss essentially fire them mid-year is not a way to encourage continued effort on their part.

Medicare Insurgents

By on 3.15.06 | 9:54AM

This evening the Senate will vote on a proposal by Senators Olympia Snowe and Ron Wyden to replace the new Medicare drug benefit's competitive pricing model with a single payer drug system controlled by the government. Senator Wyden likes to compare his proposal to Costco getting a good deal for consumers on toilet paper.

Except that Wyden actually opposed his own proposal seven years ago when President Clinton introduced a Medicare drug benefit that barred the government from setting or negotiating prices for nearly half the prescription drug market. My new partner in crime at the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest Peter Pitts blogged on this at

My New Hero

By on 3.15.06 | 9:27AM

I love Lucianne's site. I love it even more now that she's posted this. Stop what you are doing and check it out.