The Spectacle Blog
Peter: Thanks for the kind words. If anyone missed the segment, they can see it here. The media - again leading the Dems by the nose - wants the NSA intelligence program to blow the good news from Iraq off the front pages, which it has done. The president, in his speech tonight, will try to refocus on the astonishing accomplishment of the Iraqi people. But nothing will divert the media from this story.
The Sunday morning talk shows later today will be full of it. The NSA story, I mean.
Jed, good work last night and good luck tonight. But one thing I'm still trying to figure out is why would the President not simply use the law on the books to approach secret courts for approval on these taps?
The only way my imagination can rationalize it is by seeing the surveillance as a far broader activity than could possibly be performed if warrants had to be sought regularly from the "secret court," which I imagine looks something like Judge Judy's court, only with worse lighting and smoke for effect.
The press seems incredulous at the moment that Bush actually offered frank honesty as a result of this. The New York Times offered:
I'll be on Fox again, this time on "Heartland with John Kasich" tonight about 8 pm EST, talking about the NSA intel flap. The more I research this, the more likely it seems that the president acted legally. But there's still a lot of law to read. More Monday in Loose Canons.
I'll be on tonight with John Gibson about 5 pm on FNC talking about the New York Times story on the president's domestic intelligence operations through NSA. Stay tuned.
So now we have a filibuster of the PATRIOT Act extension following hard upon Mr. McCain's success in getting his al Qaeda bill of rights agreed on. How many ways can Congress spell "surrender"?
I just love what ol' Leaky Leahy said about the PATRIOT Act. He wants to mend it, not end it. Where have we heard that before?
I was once an encyclopedia