The Spectacle Blog

In Case You Missed It…

By on 11.8.05 | 2:08PM

Thank goodness for Sen. John Cornyn, one of the few Republicans willing to stand up and push back against Democratic prevarication. On the floor yesterday he hit Sen. Harry Reid where it hurts:

SENATOR CORNYN: I wish to ask my colleagues, did President Clinton lie when he discussed the intelligence that led him to support the forced ouster of Saddam Hussein? Did he manipulate intelligence to justify his bombing in Iraq? Or did he rely upon the same intelligence that this administration and this Congress and our allies did when they came to the same conclusion that Saddam was a threat to the region and to the world? Are there Senators who today would renounce their vote to remove Saddam by force in October of 2002? Out of the bipartisan 77 who voted to authorize the use of force to remove Saddam Hussein, I have only learned of two who have said they regret that vote and would renounce it.

Before the war, a leading Democrat -- in fact, the Democratic leader -- clearly stated his position in Iraq. As of this morning, his quotation was still on his Senate Web site. It says:

Send to Kindle

Investigating the Post Leak

By on 11.8.05 | 1:43PM

Interesting that in recent stories that dealt with the seeming diminished influence of Vice President Dick Cheney within the Bush Adminstration and on Capitol Hill, one of the key unattributed anecdotes deals with Sen. Jay Rockefeller, who also happens to serve as ranking member on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

As this new investigation into serious intelligence leaks moves forward, look for the staff of Rockefeller to be mentioned prominently in stories.

Send to Kindle

Les Insufferables

By on 11.8.05 | 1:12PM

 

Sorry, but les personnes insupportables -- the French, of course -- are once again fair game, regardless of their troubles. Our self-imposed moratorium on the abuse of France is hereby ended because -- as I am informed -- their self-defense website is picking on Jay Leno.

Their complaint, as it always is against any of us, is that the offender is being, well, offensive to the French. But in the evidence they cite, they prove Leno's innocence, at least of slander. Hilariously, with a compendium of Lenoisms going back a couple of years. To wit:

Send to Kindle

Thanks, George…

By on 11.8.05 | 1:01PM

I just learned from CNSNews.com that Quinnipiac has Hillary Clinton's re-elect at 64% -- and 32% among Republicans. There is no doubt in my mind that she will be re-elected next year with possibly well over 60% of the vote when all is said and done, giving her even more momentum and credibility heading into 2008. Mrs. Clinton has played it pretty smart in the Senate, but not that smart. So who do we have to thank for the impending blow-out? Governor George Elmer Pataki and his lazy minions who, when given an opportunity to field a serious candidate against her, chose instead to cash in with the liberal, unqualified, and increasingly embarrassing District Attorney from Westchester County, Jeanine Pirro. Very, very unfortunate.

Send to Kindle

Nice Try

By on 11.8.05 | 12:57PM

A friend in Los Angeles e-mails:

I'm standing in line at the polls this morning and these union thugs show up, walk right past the line and go up to the registration table where some diffident 90 year old woman is stationed. She tells them that the records show that they voted absentee already…

The union guys respond, "We never actually voted. We lost our ballots. So we're here to vote today."

The old woman, clearly flustered, was about to give them ballots when the supervisor swooped in and stopped her. The supervisor says, "You guys have got to be kidding." She flatly refused to let them vote and they stormed out bitching about being "disenfranchised."

Shouldn't they have been arrested?

Send to Kindle

On His Way Out

By on 11.8.05 | 12:44PM

Are you getting sick of Democratic pols whining and dining out on all the usual talking points and distortions? Consider this one:

Send to Kindle

More on Wilson

By on 11.8.05 | 12:12PM

As reported by Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in the media, MGen. Paul Vallely is still being threatened with a lawsuit by Joe Wilson. Vallely told ABC Radio's John Batchelor and World Net Daily that Wilson had told him that Wilson's wife was a CIA employee. Wilson, on hearing Vallely's statement, e-mailed his lawyer who, in turn, has demanded Vallely retract his statement. Vallely instead repeated it last night on Batchelor's show.

Rush just read my column on the air and others will, I'm sure, pick it up from there. Wilson must be feeling the heat. Vallely, meanwhile, has corrected one thing he told me and that is included in today's column. He e-mailed me today to say that his wife didn't overhear Wilson's comment about Plame's CIA status. At this point it is a he said/he said controversy. Stay tuned. Maybe -- just maybe -- someone will get Joe Wilson under oath and get to the bottom of his story. Which, of course, still begins with the yet-to-be-identified senior CIA official who hired him and turned him loose.

Send to Kindle

Frantz Fanon, Call Your Office

By on 11.8.05 | 11:56AM

The last line of a column in today's NY Post could have been written by many fevered commentators of the Left. What a stunner to look up and see that it comes from the usually sensible Ralph Peters:

"Meanwhile, every American who believes in racial equality and human dignity should sympathize with the rioters, not with the effete bigots on the Seine/>."
/>

How about sympathizing with neither? I'm for the cops, myself.
/>

Peters’s column has other choice tidbits, like this: “If your skin is brown or black in la belle France, you haven't got a chance at a decent life. Now the wretched of the earth have exploded in rage.”
/>

And their apologists have proliferated.

Send to Kindle

Pages